Giuliani, McCain pick up key Christian conservative backing

Nevadamedic

Senior Member
Jul 13, 2007
1,439
178
48
Diagon Alley
Call it a battle for the hearts and minds of Christian conservative voters.

Pat Robertson, the television evangelist and Christian Coalition founder, endorsed Republican White House hopeful Rudy Giuliani for president when the two men appeared together at the National Press Club in Washington on Wednesday.

Robertson said he decided to endorse Giuliani because he was "a proven leader who is not afraid of what lies ahead and who will cast a hopeful vision for all Americans."

"In all of the crises which confront our nation and the world, we need a leader with a bold vision who is not afraid to tackle the challenges ahead," Robertson said. Watch Robertson call Giuliani ready to lead »

Meanwhile, former White House hopeful Sen. Sam Brownback, a Kansas Republican who is the leading voice for Christian conservatives in the Senate, will endorse Sen. John McCain for president, McCain's campaign announced Wednesday.

The Giuliani campaign hopes the Robertson endorsement will help the former New York City mayor to make inroads among evangelical Christians. Giuliani is trying to make the case with social conservative voters that despite his support for abortion and gay rights, he is an acceptable choice as the Republican presidential nominee.

It was Robertson's 1988 presidential campaign that, while unsuccessful, established evangelical voters as a dominant force within the Republican Party.

Robertson has repeatedly praised Giuliani despite their major differences on social policy. Both men say a friendship developed after a long conversation on a plane during a trip to Israel several years ago. Another thing both men have in common is that they are prostate cancer survivors.

Giuliani is the frontrunner in the national polls, but he trails in surveys in many of the early primary and caucus states, among them Iowa and South Carolina, where social conservative voters make up a major part of the Republican voting electorate.

The Robertson endorsement may also quash talk of a social conservative third party candidate if Giuliani wins the nomination.

It also put a dent in Mitt Romney's courting of the religious right. The former Massachusetts governor has made major inroads with Christian conservatives, despite the concerns by some regarding his Mormon faith.

When asked about Robertson's endorsement, Romney said, "You can't get them all" and then touted his recent endorsements from conservative activist Paul Weyrich and Bob Jones III, the president of the evangelical Bob Jones University in Greenville, South Carolina.

McCain is also hoping to capture Christian conservative support. A McCain campaign source and Republican Party sources tell CNN that Brownback's endorsement will come today when the two men appear together at a McCain campaign event in Iowa.

The Republican senator from Kansas gave up his own bid for the White House last month after lackluster fundraising and poor showings in both the national and crucial early primary and caucus state polls.

"I am endorsing the best pro-life candidate to beat Hillary Clinton," Brownback said in a press conference in Dubuque, Iowa.

"Here is a pro-life leader who will appoint strict-constructionist judges so that I believe we can end this night of wrong and have Roe v. Wade overturned," Brownback continued.

McCain, who hovers around fourth place in many recent polls out of this crucial early-voting state, hailed the endorsement as "significant."

"There are endorsements and then there are endorsements, support and different kinds of support," he said. "This time the support comes from one of the most respected men in America."

Brownback is a socially conservative senator who emphasized his opposition to abortion, gay marriage and other issues important to Christian conservatives, who make up an influential voting block within the Republican Party.

His endorsement could help McCain in Iowa. The caucuses there, which will be held on January 3, will kick off the presidential primary calendar.

McCain trails badly in the polls in Iowa to Romney. McCain opposes legalizing abortion and gay marriage, but he is not a darling of the far right. Brownback's endorsement may help McCain with such social conservative voters.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/07/conservatives.endorsements/index.html

I wouldn't call Senator Brownback a major endorsement but for Giuliani this is huge, it will help him get the Christian vote that he was going to be lacking.
 
I don't know what comes off worst here, Robertson or the state of conservatism in general. That's really pretty pathetic: a cross-dressing, gun-banning, gay-mariage-and-abortion supporting non-churchgoer gets the endorsement? What would have stopped it? Live anal sex in public?

Probably what gets Robertson's nipples hard here is Rudy's threat to kill the Arabs for Israel's sake. I guess that's enough to make up for all the dead babies.
 
I don't know what comes off worst here, Robertson or the state of conservatism. That's really pretty pathetic: a cross-dressing, gun-banning, gay-mariage-and-abortion supporting non-churchgoer gets the endorsement? What would have stopped it? Live anal sex in public?

Probably what gets Robertson's nipples hard here is Rudy's threat to kill the Arabs for Israel's sake. I guess that's enough to make up for all the dead babies.

:clap2:

Anyone who thinks Giuliani is anywhere NEAR Conservative is brain damaged.
 
I don't know what comes off worst here, Robertson or the state of conservatism. That's really pretty pathetic: a cross-dressing, gun-banning, gay-mariage-and-abortion supporting non-churchgoer gets the endorsement? What would have stopped it? Live anal sex in public?

Probably what gets Robertson's nipples hard here is Rudy's threat to kill the Arabs for Israel's sake. I guess that's enough to make up for all the dead babies.

It is called compromise. Would you rather vote for a conservative who is unlikely to win and thereby increase the Democrat Party’s chance of putting one of their people in the White House? Sometimes it is better to vote for the “lesser of two evils”.

See http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3672897&page=1
 
I don't know what comes off worst here, Robertson or the state of conservatism in general. That's really pretty pathetic: a cross-dressing, gun-banning, gay-mariage-and-abortion supporting non-churchgoer gets the endorsement? What would have stopped it? Live anal sex in public?

Probably what gets Robertson's nipples hard here is Rudy's threat to kill the Arabs for Israel's sake. I guess that's enough to make up for all the dead babies.

Shouldn't you be at a Klan meeting?
 
I don't know what comes off worst here, Robertson or the state of conservatism in general. That's really pretty pathetic: a cross-dressing, gun-banning, gay-mariage-and-abortion supporting non-churchgoer gets the endorsement? What would have stopped it? Live anal sex in public?

Probably what gets Robertson's nipples hard here is Rudy's threat to kill the Arabs for Israel's sake. I guess that's enough to make up for all the dead babies.

thats exactly what it is robertson also supported chinas one child policy which amounts to abortion

Did Pat Robertson Just Defend China's One-Child Policy ...Pat Robertson in deep trouble after defending China's one-child policy ... why he supports improved trade relations with China when the country's one-child ...
www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/aprilweb-only/4-16-32.0.html - 53k -
 
Yes, you were. WJ made a good argument and you completely ignored it. That's the definition of the word ignore.

WJ's argument was ok until he went off the rails with yet another anti-semitic rant.

It's real simple, the religious right had to pick someone, and someone who's a credible candidate, or they lose to the dems, end of story... these guys are nothing if not politically savvy.
 
WJ's argument was ok until he went off the rails with yet another anti-semitic rant.

It's real simple, the religious right had to pick someone, and someone who's a credible candidate, or they lose to the dems, end of story... these guys are nothing if not politically savvy.

What's really sad is calling someone an anti-semite because they do not agree with special treatment for Israel.
 
What's really sad is calling someone an anti-semite because they do not agree with special treatment for Israel.

dingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingDINGDINGDINGDEINDGINDGINDIGNDGND!

we HAVE a winner!

Birth Pangs of a New Christian Zionism
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060814/new_christian_zionism

Anyone ever catch that show on TBN? The one where "christians" get frenzied into praying for bombing Iran for the sake of zionism?
 

Forum List

Back
Top