Giuliani just isn't that slick when it comes to covering for Trump about tapes

[WTP]

ttps://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/26/anderson-cooper-trump-cohen-tapes-kth-sot-vpx.cnn
People, at some point, Republicans are going to have to deal with Trump and this "massive" web of deceit, lies, and criminal activity that has taken over the well being of this country. Trump is simply not worth sacrificing 250 years of Constitutional government and the rule of law.

And now, with this additional evidence that couldn't have been more crystal clear in this audio tape of Trump and Cohen, some of their key quotes were as follows: This is Trump; "what financing". Then Cohen after Trump said this, "we'll have to pay". Then Trump said after that, "in cash". Then Cohen said, "no,no, no,no,no". The only way one could not have heard that audio as clear as it was, is if you were either Helen Keller, Rudy Giuliani, or simply someone who isn't interested in the truth. Those are the three options. Now that I have listened to it over and over, the relevant parts to that tape were crystal clear.

And also, to be clear, what was said is an implication of illegal campaign finance violations, weeks before an election to hide an affair, that showed intent to do so.And it doesn't even matter that any money ever changed hands. That's the beauty of this case. This shows a conspiracy to gain an edge or thing of value in an election, that would have directly hurt Trump if exposed. The legal liability in this one tape is huge.

 

[airplanemechanic]

CNN?

 

[WTP]

CNN?

I think it's going to be better than that.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What was on the tape is so innocuous and tepid, democrats have accused Trump of leaking it himself.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I think nothing will happen. If Hillary can have thousands of classified emails on a unclassifed server that was accessed by Russia and disclosed by whats his face stuck in the consulate and not have charges brought against her, Trump will slide through easily about never having paid a woman hush money.

What liberals don't even understand is its not against the law to pay a woman hush money. It's not against the law to pay her in cash or check. So all this is much tadoo about nothing.

 

[WTP]

What was on the tape is so innocuous and tepid, democrats have accused Trump of leaking it himself.

Trump new it was going to come out. What about it?

And "innocuous and tepid"? Which one are you? Helen Keller or one of those Trump apologists who isn't interested in the truth?

 

[WTP]

I think nothing will happen. If Hillary can have thousands of classified emails on a unclassifed server that was accessed by Russia and disclosed by whats his face stuck in the consulate and not have charges brought against her, Trump will slide through easily about never having paid a woman hush money.

What liberals don't even understand is its not against the law to pay a woman hush money. It's not against the law to pay her in cash or check. So all this is much tadoo about nothing.

Lol! Paying her or not paying her hush money, won't be the case made. The conspiracy to hide an affair weeks before the election through a company and not reporting it, will be the major liability, because it was supposed to help Trump bypass the electorate knowing anything about this, which would have hurt him in the general. That didn't happen, so he violated campaign finance laws. Money or no money, it's totally irrelevant.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I think nothing will happen. If Hillary can have thousands of classified emails on a unclassifed server that was accessed by Russia and disclosed by whats his face stuck in the consulate and not have charges brought against her, Trump will slide through easily about never having paid a woman hush money.

What liberals don't even understand is its not against the law to pay a woman hush money. It's not against the law to pay her in cash or check. So all this is much tadoo about nothing.

Lol! Paying her or not paying her hush money, won't be the case made. The conspiracy to hide an affair weeks before the election through a company and not reporting it, will be the major liability, because it was supposed to help Trump bypass the electorate knowing anything about this, which would have hurt him in the general. That didn't happen, so he violated campaign finance laws. Money or no money, it's totally irrelevant.

That didn't even make any fucking sense. Hide an affair weeks before an election through a company? The affair was from 2006, dumbass. What company? WTF are you smoking?

 

[BULLDOG]

I think nothing will happen. If Hillary can have thousands of classified emails on a unclassifed server that was accessed by Russia and disclosed by whats his face stuck in the consulate and not have charges brought against her, Trump will slide through easily about never having paid a woman hush money.

What liberals don't even understand is its not against the law to pay a woman hush money. It's not against the law to pay her in cash or check. So all this is much tadoo about nothing.

I agree with most of what you said, but if paying for her silence was for the purpose of effecting an election, that is a big crime. Considering the timing of the event' it's hard to believe it was for anything other than preventing public knowledge before the election.

 

[EverCurious]

ttps://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/26/anderson-cooper-trump-cohen-tapes-kth-sot-vpx.cnn
People, at some point, Republicans are going to have to deal with Trump and this "massive" web of deceit, lies, and criminal activity that has taken over the well being of this country. Trump is simply not worth sacrificing 250 years of Constitutional government and the rule of law.

And now, with this additional evidence that couldn't have been more crystal clear in this audio tape of Trump and Cohen, some of their key quotes were as follows: This is Trump; "what financing". Then Cohen after Trump said this, "we'll have to pay". Then Trump said after that, "in cash". Then Cohen said, "no,no, no,no,no". The only way one could not have heard that audio as clear as it was, is if you were either Helen Keller, Rudy Giuliani, or simply someone who isn't interested in the truth. Those are the three options. Now that I have listened to it over and over, the relevant parts to that tape were crystal clear.

And also, to be clear, what was said is an implication of illegal campaign finance violations, weeks before an election to hide an affair, that showed intent to do so.And it doesn't even matter that any money ever changed hands. That's the beauty of this case. This shows a conspiracy to gain an edge or thing of value in an election, that would have directly hurt Trump if exposed. The legal liability in this one tape is huge.

OAN was reporting that a Dem presidential candidate (don't recall the name but I'm sure one can look it up) a few years ago did the exact same thing (pay for the story rights scheme) and he wasn't busted for campaign finance violations on it.

Also, IF Trump has been paying them off for "decades", as is being reported, then the prosecution will be hard pressed to prove it was "related to the campaign" "this time" which means, no campaign finance violation.

We'll see if it disappears from the news shortly as no doubt the MSM is frothing at the mouth to find out if their Impeach 45 campaign can use it or not.

 

[strollingbones]

i am simply amazed that trump voters continue their support of this man even as he laughs in their faces....what happen to concern with national debt? what happen with concerns about freedom of speech? the 2nd adm is not the only one...if only trump voters could support them all the same way they do the 2nd adm...

 

[strollingbones]

he is bailing out farmers to cover his ass when the only farms that exist are midland archer and that ilk

 

[EverCurious]

he is bailing out farmers to cover his ass when the only farms that exist are midland archer and that ilk

Actually he's doing a stop gap in an attempt to better the long term picture for them in the trade market. I hear most farmers are on board for the long haul results and appreciate what he's trying to do.

 

[strollingbones]

and you hear that from whom?

 

[strollingbones]

stop gap....it is going into debt over a problem he has created....do you not see that?

 

[strollingbones]

can this country afford a 12 billion dollar bail out....can future generations afford this bail out?

 

[strollingbones]

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/national-debt-trump/

an interesting article....

 

[EverCurious]

Look, anyone in business, and that includes farmers, knows that sometimes you gotta spend some money to make money. Or a better statement is sometimes you have to take risks to get ahead; and ultimately most businessmen also know that it's usually worth it to take the risk, than to not take it.

Trump's goal is actually 0 tariffs on either side, your media likes to leave that shit out in their attempt to lead you around by the nose. Either way, /we/ have all the fucking power, we're the biggest market on the planet. NO nation can go without us, period. Trump is leveraging tariffs in an attempt to get a more lucrative and fair deal overseas for American businesses, most businesses get it, even if they're not so keen on tariffs in principle (aka they're free market capitalists.)

And yea, he's trying to protect our vulnerable smaller farmers from the game, because they can't ride such a gamble out as easily as the big farms can. He actually gives a shit about them, they notice that even if you folks don't.

 

[WTP]

I think nothing will happen. If Hillary can have thousands of classified emails on a unclassifed server that was accessed by Russia and disclosed by whats his face stuck in the consulate and not have charges brought against her, Trump will slide through easily about never having paid a woman hush money.

What liberals don't even understand is its not against the law to pay a woman hush money. It's not against the law to pay her in cash or check. So all this is much tadoo about nothing.

Lol! Paying her or not paying her hush money, won't be the case made. The conspiracy to hide an affair weeks before the election through a company and not reporting it, will be the major liability, because it was supposed to help Trump bypass the electorate knowing anything about this, which would have hurt him in the general. That didn't happen, so he violated campaign finance laws. Money or no money, it's totally irrelevant.

That didn't even make any fucking sense. Hide an affair weeks before an election through a company? The affair was from 2006, dumbass. What company? WTF are you smoking?

If it hadn't been relevant, 2006 or 1906, they wouldn't have been looking to buy David Peckers story on September 30th, 2016.

 

[WTP]

ttps://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/26/anderson-cooper-trump-cohen-tapes-kth-sot-vpx.cnn
People, at some point, Republicans are going to have to deal with Trump and this "massive" web of deceit, lies, and criminal activity that has taken over the well being of this country. Trump is simply not worth sacrificing 250 years of Constitutional government and the rule of law.

And now, with this additional evidence that couldn't have been more crystal clear in this audio tape of Trump and Cohen, some of their key quotes were as follows: This is Trump; "what financing". Then Cohen after Trump said this, "we'll have to pay". Then Trump said after that, "in cash". Then Cohen said, "no,no, no,no,no". The only way one could not have heard that audio as clear as it was, is if you were either Helen Keller, Rudy Giuliani, or simply someone who isn't interested in the truth. Those are the three options. Now that I have listened to it over and over, the relevant parts to that tape were crystal clear.

And also, to be clear, what was said is an implication of illegal campaign finance violations, weeks before an election to hide an affair, that showed intent to do so.And it doesn't even matter that any money ever changed hands. That's the beauty of this case. This shows a conspiracy to gain an edge or thing of value in an election, that would have directly hurt Trump if exposed. The legal liability in this one tape is huge.

OAN was reporting that a Dem presidential candidate (don't recall the name but I'm sure one can look it up) a few years ago did the exact same thing (pay for the story rights scheme) and he wasn't busted for campaign finance violations on it.

Also, IF Trump has been paying them off for "decades", as is being reported, then the prosecution will be hard pressed to prove it was "related to the campaign" "this time" which means, no campaign finance violation.

We'll see if it disappears from the news shortly as no doubt the MSM is frothing at the mouth to find out if their Impeach 45 campaign can use it or not.

Right before the campaign, is what matters, plus the fact it wasn't reported, and his tax returns would be turned over in a case like that.