PubliusInfinitum
Rookie
- Aug 18, 2008
- 6,805
- 729
- 0
- Banned
- #61
PI said:Is it now? Well let's see how ya do..
Gunny said:They represent no foreign nation. They are not in the military of any foreign nation. They have no legitimate standing as an army.
Yeah? No shit gunny....
And actually, labeling them illegal combatants as you have just lends credence to MY argument. They are criminals.
Actually, YOU just laid out a fair bit of what defines them as illegal combatants... and we tried policing them as Criminals Gunny. See: 9-11
That didn't work out so well... and it's the height of idiocy to try the same damn thing and expect a different result.
There is a legitimate argument.
No sir... there's NOT and your failure to PRODUCE such an argument isn't a great way to demonstrate such. IF there is a LEGITMATE ARGUMENT: POST IT.
You refuse to recognize it; yet, you call them POW's in one breath and illegal combatants in the next.
What is "IT" Gunny? Where's this "Legitimate argument?"
WHICH is it?
You act as if they're mutally exclisive terms... They're ILLEGAL COMBATANTS IN A WAR WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN PRISONER... See how that works?
YOU pick a side, moron. Before you do, I suggest you get your head out of your ass and learn the facts instead of all this one-sided shit you spew.
ROFL... Well sure.. because the only valid argument is one where 'both right and wrong must be set at equity...' Nice Relativism... and FTR: it's fallacious drivel.
You're in effect arguing that to take a side is to ignore the position of the opposition... when in FACT I have considered the other sides point of view, recognized the fatal flaw in it's reasoning and REJECTED IT based upon that flawed reasoning.
When you presume to send me to fight YOUR fucking war, you damned well better have a legitimate reason for me to drop the hammer on ANYONE. Got that, pissant?
Oh spare me the sanctimonious claptrap, you're not the only Marine engaged in this discussion... There has never been a more legitimate reason than that reasoning that the US GWOT is founded... Got that screwball?
Otherwise, get your ass off the sofa and go do your own fucking killing.
ROFLMNAO... Oh that's rich...
I don't recall that I stated the Constitution said a damned thing about it. I only referred to your convoluted ideals that go against the ideals the Constitution represent.
This is a text forum, what you recall is irrelvant, what you said is WRITTEN on the record... HAD you pasted the discussion as is CUSTOMARY instead of this trainwreck, we'd ALL know what you said and could readily see that you're running to avoid being held accountable for your failure...
What convoluted ideas of mine go against WHAT IDEALS REPRESENTED IN THE USC, GUNNY? BE SPECIFIC.
What the hell is the matter with you man? You're making absolutely No sense...
I'm getting the impression that someone has hijacked this guy's account... this whole episode is getting BIZARE!
However, dipshit, you just posted above what laws cover illegal combatants. You really aren't good at this.
No idea what that even means...
What church does he attend? You know ... the one you were Hell on wheels about him attending for 20+ years? Yeah, THAT church.
Hypocrite. I don't give a DAMN what Islamic rule you want to pull out your ass when it suits you. I define the man by his actions and his words. Neither add up to your intellectually dishonest accusation.
Yeah... the Church which cast their most significant award to the Nation of Islam... Look, Hussein was raised as a Muslim, his school records in Malaysia show him listed as Muslim... this conflicts with Hussein's position; yet that record exist... and that he was born to a Muslim FATHER makes him a MUSLIM... Now that's not MY RULE... its the MUSLIM RULE. If he's a Christian by Faith FINE... if you can show me where he has declared such, I will accept that. But you're askig me to accept circumstantial evidence which IMPLIES a conclusion. But without regard to his CHOSEN FAITH... he is a BLOOD MUSLIM.
My position is that it is an EGGREGEOUS ERROR IN REASONING TO SET A MUSLIM IN THE CinC WHEN THE NATION IS AT WAR WITH ISLAM. Is it true or NOT that he has, since taking office implemented policy which is favorable to ISLAM, specifically ISLAMIC TERROIST GROUPS, most notably HAMAS?
My argument is simple. You obviously wouldn't know a Marxist if one came up to you wearing a sign that said as much.
As I stated, a Marxist is one who advocates for the tenets of Marxism... Of which President Hussein is a perfect example. I asked you to define a Marxist as YOU understand it, and the above drivel is the best you could DO...
So given the evidence it's YOU sir that is clearly clueless as to what a Marxist is and is not.
Last edited: