Giss, 2010 warmest thus far

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Old Rocks, Jun 13, 2010.

  1. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,440
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,294
  2. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    40,948
    Thanks Received:
    7,964
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,684
    Is this the same GISS that acknowledged that their data was inferior to the CRU? Which we then found out had no raw data? That they had "lost" all of their raw data? Is this the
    same GISS we're talking about? If it is then they have no credibility at the current time.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. gslack
    Offline

    gslack Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    4,527
    Thanks Received:
    346
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +346
    Dude stop making up shit.. Seriously its tiresome busting you on it... from your link...

    notice the bottom of the graph pic there... it says "Base period 1951-1980"

    WTH does that mean? Well it means they base what they call "anomalies" on their deviance from the 1951-1980 base temp averages..... So we aren't really talking about 130 years or so of comparison as the claims lead to believe, but rather comparison of modern temps to a 29 year average...

    in other words they basically take 130 or so years of collected temp data, and then compare it to modern satellite temp data, and then using the 1951-1980 as reference they say this or that modern temp is anomalous at any given time or place...

    So... 30 years as a base, comparing 130 or so years and modern satellite data, and then saying this is a strange deviation from this or that.... ok....

    Sure they use 130 years of data, but the compare it to a 29 year period to discern what is and is not an anomalous.. Talk about fucked up....

    Look if we cannot get these fuckheads to just knock off the bullshit snow job, why even bother calling them experts any more.... Why don't they just take the temps and compare them across the board to the last 130 years straight up and without all the nonsense? Because the reality is those numbers will not be so scary and they require a fear to sell this horse shit....

    Oldsocks this is getting too easy to bust you on... And the fact your claim above is not mentioned on there is even more telling of your character....:lol:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,440
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,294
    I see, ol' Suckee..... NASA just doesn't stand a chance around your superior intelligence.:cuckoo:
     
  5. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,163
    Thanks Received:
    14,901
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,894
    I thought the Vostok Ice Cores established an 800 year lag between Temp and CO2? What the fucking fuck? Is this some Super Mutant strain of CO2?
     
  6. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    When NASA's own numbers purposefully cherry pick a scant 60-year record of temps to try and "prove" the AGW hoax, and you glom onto it like it's the Sermon on the Mount, it's pretty evident who has the inferior level of intelligence, Old Rocksinthehead. :lol::lol::lol:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,163
    Thanks Received:
    14,901
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,894
    It's even warmer than when the Western US was under the Great Inland Sea and there were no polar ice caps! Dats how Warm it be!
     
  8. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,440
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,294
    How's the hollow moon coming along, Frank? :lol:
     
  9. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,440
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,294
    Sure, Dooodeee......sure. Now, any science to back up your yap-yap?:eusa_whistle:
     
  10. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,163
    Thanks Received:
    14,901
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,894
    I'm meltingggggggggggggg meltingggggggggg.

    Don't get no Giss upon the sofa, sofa
     

Share This Page