Gingrich costing taxpayers $40,000 a day

[Big Fitz]

Here ya go Stephanie ... I think this is what you meant to say ...

The Current ReaganBush Debt is:
$10,460,445,976,789.60
which means that in a total of 20 years,
these three presidents have led to the creation of
91.79%
of the entire national debt
in only 8.4746% of the 236 years of the existence of the United States of America.

ReaganBushDebt.org

Ohlord... THIS bullshit again?

What bullshit?

Conservatives spend like crazy and run economies off the rails. Almost every single freakin time.

This from a believer in the paragons of fiscal restraint of liberalism.

 

[mudwhistle]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

 

[candycorn]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

Based on what?

 

[LoneLaugher]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

Uh-oh! You did it now. Prepare to be asked "Where in the Constitution does it say that anyone has the right to SS protection?".

 

[mudwhistle]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

Based on what?

The agreed guidelines set forth in Congress.

Both parties agree to who gets protection. The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy by Sirhan Sirhan pretty much was the deciding factor.

A simple Google search would have easily discovered this if you bothered to do it.

This intense security for also-rans dates back to 1968, when Robert Kennedy walked off the stage at the Ambassador Hotel and was shot by Sirhan Sirhan. Congress amended the Secret Service Protection Law, offering men in dark suits and sunglasses to every “major” candidate for president. To get a security detail, a campaign takes its case to a bipartisan advisory committee in Congress, comprising the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and the speaker and minority leader of the House. Memet Walker interview: Why is the Secret Service still protecting Newt Gingrich? - Slate Magazine

Link
Memet Walker interview: Why is the Secret Service still protecting Newt Gingrich? - Slate Magazine
http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30527.pdf

 

[mudwhistle]

Listen....you people need to worry more about the waste Obama is causing every day. He's running his whole campaign on our dollar. Every dollar he collects is going into a war-chest while he spends our money on his campaign. As long as he doesn't mention a candidate by name he charges it to official duties of the President.

 

[candycorn]

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

Based on what?

The agreed guidelines set forth in Congress.

Both parties agree to who gets protection. The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy by Sirhan Sirhan pretty much was the deciding factor.

A simple Google search would have easily discovered this if you bothered to do it.

This intense security for also-rans dates back to 1968, when Robert Kennedy walked off the stage at the Ambassador Hotel and was shot by Sirhan Sirhan. Congress amended the Secret Service Protection Law, offering men in dark suits and sunglasses to every “major” candidate for president. To get a security detail, a campaign takes its case to a bipartisan advisory committee in Congress, comprising the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and the speaker and minority leader of the House. Memet Walker interview: Why is the Secret Service still protecting Newt Gingrich? - Slate Magazine

Link
Memet Walker interview: Why is the Secret Service still protecting Newt Gingrich? - Slate Magazine
http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30527.pdf

Gingrich isn't a major candidate and hasn't been since South Carolina. If you're okay spending what is reported to be a quarter of a million dollars a week of your money protecting this nobody (I think it sounds high by the way), you should shut the fuck up about any waste elsewhere.

 

[mudwhistle]

Based on what?

The agreed guidelines set forth in Congress.

Both parties agree to who gets protection. The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy by Sirhan Sirhan pretty much was the deciding factor.

A simple Google search would have easily discovered this if you bothered to do it.

This intense security for also-rans dates back to 1968, when Robert Kennedy walked off the stage at the Ambassador Hotel and was shot by Sirhan Sirhan. Congress amended the Secret Service Protection Law, offering men in dark suits and sunglasses to every “major” candidate for president. To get a security detail, a campaign takes its case to a bipartisan advisory committee in Congress, comprising the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and the speaker and minority leader of the House. Memet Walker interview: Why is the Secret Service still protecting Newt Gingrich? - Slate Magazine

Link
Memet Walker interview: Why is the Secret Service still protecting Newt Gingrich? - Slate Magazine
http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30527.pdf

Gingrich isn't a major candidate and hasn't been since South Carolina. If you're okay spending what is reported to be a quarter of a million dollars a week of your money protecting this nobody (I think it sounds high by the way), you should shut the fuck up about any waste elsewhere.

Gingrich has met the guildines set forth and agreed upon by congress.

You just don't like him. However he had at one time a better chance of winning than Santorum. Ron Paul even get SS protection and he's never been a serious candidate.

I think you need to STFU about spending because your boy Barry is costing us more in less than half the time than Bush ever did. Tell him to stop making spending proposals and tell him to start cutting spending like he promised.

 

[candycorn]

The agreed guidelines set forth in Congress.

Both parties agree to who gets protection. The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy by Sirhan Sirhan pretty much was the deciding factor.

A simple Google search would have easily discovered this if you bothered to do it.



Link
Memet Walker interview: Why is the Secret Service still protecting Newt Gingrich? - Slate Magazine
http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30527.pdf

Gingrich isn't a major candidate and hasn't been since South Carolina. If you're okay spending what is reported to be a quarter of a million dollars a week of your money protecting this nobody (I think it sounds high by the way), you should shut the fuck up about any waste elsewhere.

Gingrich has met the guildines set forth and agreed upon by congress.

You just don't like him. However he had at one time a better chance of winning than Santorum. Ron Paul even get SS protection and he's never been a serious candidate.

I think you need to STFU about spending because your boy Barry is costing us more in less than half the time than Bush ever did. Tell him to stop making spending proposals and tell him to start cutting spending like he promised.

Gingrich is not a serious candidate...that is the only issue here. He has no chance of winning, has had no chance of winning, never had a chance of winning and is far and away embarrassing himself and persons like you.

Nice attempt at deflection here. Too bad it doesn't make up for the fact that the republican party has left the radical morons like yourself behind....better luck next life.

 

[Liability]

Gingrich isn't a major candidate and hasn't been since South Carolina. If you're okay spending what is reported to be a quarter of a million dollars a week of your money protecting this nobody (I think it sounds high by the way), you should shut the fuck up about any waste elsewhere.

Gingrich has met the guildines set forth and agreed upon by congress.

You just don't like him. However he had at one time a better chance of winning than Santorum. Ron Paul even get SS protection and he's never been a serious candidate.

I think you need to STFU about spending because your boy Barry is costing us more in less than half the time than Bush ever did. Tell him to stop making spending proposals and tell him to start cutting spending like he promised.

Gingrich is not a serious candidate...that is the only issue here. He has no chance of winning, has had no chance of winning, never had a chance of winning and is far and away embarrassing himself and persons like you.

Nice attempt at deflection here. Too bad it doesn't make up for the fact that the republican party has left the radical morons like yourself behind....better luck next life.

Newt was not a stellar candidate.

But he'd still be a better President than the idiot you support.

 

[GHook93]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

That is about the same tax payor dollar tab Obama's security service detail spends on hooker

 

[jillian]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

That is about the same tax payor dollar tab Obama's security service detail spends on hooker

ass..

 

[jillian]

Gingrich has met the guildines set forth and agreed upon by congress.

You just don't like him. However he had at one time a better chance of winning than Santorum. Ron Paul even get SS protection and he's never been a serious candidate.

I think you need to STFU about spending because your boy Barry is costing us more in less than half the time than Bush ever did. Tell him to stop making spending proposals and tell him to start cutting spending like he promised.

Gingrich is not a serious candidate...that is the only issue here. He has no chance of winning, has had no chance of winning, never had a chance of winning and is far and away embarrassing himself and persons like you.

Nice attempt at deflection here. Too bad it doesn't make up for the fact that the republican party has left the radical morons like yourself behind....better luck next life.

Newt was not a stellar candidate.

But he'd still be a better President than the idiot you support.

in oppositeland

 

[Liability]

Gingrich is not a serious candidate...that is the only issue here. He has no chance of winning, has had no chance of winning, never had a chance of winning and is far and away embarrassing himself and persons like you.

Nice attempt at deflection here. Too bad it doesn't make up for the fact that the republican party has left the radical morons like yourself behind....better luck next life.

Newt was not a stellar candidate.

But he'd still be a better President than the idiot you support.

in oppositeland

No. Here. In reality.

That's what caused you such confusion.

You don't even seem to grasp what a complete abject fail the incumbent has shown himself to be (even though I will acknowledge a couple of exceptions).

 

[candycorn]

Gingrich has met the guildines set forth and agreed upon by congress.

You just don't like him. However he had at one time a better chance of winning than Santorum. Ron Paul even get SS protection and he's never been a serious candidate.

I think you need to STFU about spending because your boy Barry is costing us more in less than half the time than Bush ever did. Tell him to stop making spending proposals and tell him to start cutting spending like he promised.

Gingrich is not a serious candidate...that is the only issue here. He has no chance of winning, has had no chance of winning, never had a chance of winning and is far and away embarrassing himself and persons like you.

Nice attempt at deflection here. Too bad it doesn't make up for the fact that the republican party has left the radical morons like yourself behind....better luck next life.

Newt was not a stellar candidate.

But he'd still be a better President than the idiot you support.

Doubtful.

He's mathematically eliminated from ever being considered the republican nominee. His SS detail is not needed.

 

[Peach]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

Absolutely.

 

[candycorn]

For his security detail.

Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

Absolutely.

Based on what?

 

[Mr Natural]

You mean the fat fuck hasn't dropped out yet?

What's he waiting for?

 

[Peach]

Nope. He has the right to SS protection.

Absolutely.

Based on what?

He qualified in states to run for the Republican nomination.

 

[candycorn]

Absolutely.

Based on what?

He qualified in states to run for the Republican nomination.

So being a republican qualifies him or the fact that he qualified to run in an election? Because libertarians have primaries too...do they automatically get SS protection?

Elaborate.