Getting worse! Rasmussen, now Obama is -15

[gautama]

I already said that Fox allows liberals on if they have something negative to say about the President.

Otherwise, they surround a lone liberal voice with five conservatives and call it "fair and balanced"

Which only proves you don't listen to Fox News.

For the rest of us, we are just going to laugh.

So why do I care if you don't buy that Reagan had far higher numbers than Obama?

But follow the link to the VERY BOTTOM OF THE PAGE and you will see the table that proves you are DEAD WRONG about Reagan.

ABCNEWS.com : Poll: Reagan's Presidential Ratings

Even your own link does not show "far higher" numbers, at best you could claim a draw

Either you are not good at math or you don't let the facts get in the way of your personal hatred

A better comparison of the two

Pollster.com: Obama as Reagan

Hey BogusWinger,

As usual, you're missing the ESSENTIAL POINT : Your fucking EXPOSED MONUMENTAL FRAUD is an EXPOSED MONUMENTAL FRAUD !!!!

The EXPOSED MONUMENTAL FRAUD, i.e. the Black Racist MARXIST Palestinian Guardian, Muslim PC Protector & Mexican Drug Cartel's Border Pussie Obami Salaami..........IS TOAST !!!!!

You can dance about various irrelevancies......BUT THAT IS THE BOTTOM LINE !!!

WE KNOW IT.....YOU KNOW IT......

IT'S FINITO LA COMEDIA !!!!!!

 

[WillowTree]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

I know. I almost rolled off the couch and bumped me head.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I already said that Fox allows liberals on if they have something negative to say about the President.

Otherwise, they surround a lone liberal voice with five conservatives and call it "fair and balanced"

Which only proves you don't listen to Fox News.

For the rest of us, we are just going to laugh.

So why do I care if you don't buy that Reagan had far higher numbers than Obama?

But follow the link to the VERY BOTTOM OF THE PAGE and you will see the table that proves you are DEAD WRONG about Reagan.

ABCNEWS.com : Poll: Reagan's Presidential Ratings

Even your own link does not show "far higher" numbers, at best you could claim a draw

Either you are not good at math or you don't let the facts get in the way of your personal hatred

A better comparison of the two

Pollster.com: Obama as Reagan

Yeah, because a liberal blog is always better than a standard news site.

But when Reagan's highs were 56% and his lows were 46% for the same year as Obama is in now and Obama's lows are 29/7%, you claim I'M NOT GOOD AT MATH??????

Keep up the pathetic spin.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I think more & more Americans are getting tired of being called "Racists" and the overall Socialist/Progressive agenda. You can only call good Americans Racists so much. The Socialists/Progressives have definitely over-played their race-card and now people are just p*ssed off. Endless Race-Baiting & "Blame BOOOOOOOOOOSH" wont be enough for them this time around. We need real change in this country. Hopefully this starts in 2010.

I'm not comparing Obama to Caligula so don't misunderstand.,

But Obama is making the same mistake as Caligula.

Caligula's power was derived from the loyalty of the Roman Army. When Caligula forgot that and started abusing that loyalty, the Roman army assassinated him and replaced him with his Uncle, Claudius.

Obama is kind of doing the same thing. Obama derived his power from the people that believed no WORSHIPPED him. But when liberals started to accuse ANYONE who questioned Obama of racism, they sort of stepped into the same trap as Caligula.

Fortunately, we have a far more civilized way to rid ourselves of a bad leader and I hope we do so in November 2012.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If he wasn't please provide a link.

But how do you figure -15 is a gain, when it is still MINUS 15?????

Uh, by the same reasoning you figured going from -13 to -15 was worse,

only times 3.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I think more & more Americans are getting tired of being called "Racists" and the overall Socialist/Progressive agenda. You can only call good Americans Racists so much. The Socialists/Progressives have definitely over-played their race-card and now people are just p*ssed off. Endless Race-Baiting & "Blame BOOOOOOOOOOSH" wont be enough for them this time around. We need real change in this country. Hopefully this starts in 2010.

I'll give you credit for this,

although you never make any sense or contribute anything, at least you're generally brief about it.

Brevity is stupidity's best friend.

 

[Sarah G]

I think more & more Americans are getting tired of being called "Racists" and the overall Socialist/Progressive agenda. You can only call good Americans Racists so much. The Socialists/Progressives have definitely over-played their race-card and now people are just p*ssed off. Endless Race-Baiting & "Blame BOOOOOOOOOOSH" wont be enough for them this time around. We need real change in this country. Hopefully this starts in 2010.

I'll give you credit for this,

although you never make any sense or contribute anything, at least you're generally brief about it.

Brevity is stupidity's best friend.

 

[Old Rocks]

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval

Polling Data
Poll Date Sample Approve Disapprove Spread
RCP Average 6/16 - 6/24 -- 46.9 46.6 +0.3
Newsweek 6/23 - 6/24 964 A 48 46 +2
Rasmussen Reports 6/22 - 6/24 1500 LV 45 53 -8
Gallup 6/22 - 6/24 1547 A 45 45 Tie
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 6/17 - 6/21 1000 A 45 48 -3
Pew Research 6/16 - 6/20 1802 A 48 43 +5
CBS News/NY Times 6/16 - 6/20 1259 A 47 43 +4
CNN/OpinionResearch 6/16 - 6/16 534 A 50 48 +2

See All President Obama Job Approval Polling Data

 

[teapartysamurai]

Uh, by the same reasoning you figured going from -13 to -15 was worse,

only times 3.

Carbiner, minus is MINUS!

So nice try on that one.

Where is your link??

 

[oreo]

Lost two points in two days! Yikes!

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 27% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-two percent (42%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval index rating of -15

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Wow, I wonder if they have Jimmy Carter's numbers on line.

It seems to me Obama is falling FASTER than Carter.

Obama is falling faster than Carter--I remember I was there. Carter really didn't have it too bad until his 2-1/2- to 3 year mark--before Americans actually realised what he was about.

Obama--a couple of weeks--after shoving 787 billion dollars down our throats--you could see his numbers start to trend down. Since then it's gotten much worse for him.

If you think about it--nothing he has done has worked for him.

1. Economy
2. Closing Gitmo
3. Iraq and Afganistan
4. Health care
5. Gulf oil spill

It's been a disaster ever since he came into office.

 

[ConHog]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

They are slowly starting to turn on him, but don't expect that to continue.

They all circled the wagons around Carter Reagan ran against him.

I don't know if you are old enough to remember all the dirty tricks they tried to pull against Reagan to make Reagan look bad.

It didn't matter. They couldn't help Carter. He was toast.

Carter conceded the election on the MORNING of the election (I was in Idaho at the time, so it was probably afternoon by that time on the east coast). It's pretty bad when you conceded that early.

Carter knew he didn't have a chance against Reagan.

I can say with certainty that Obama won't concede if he loses in 2012. They will have to drag him out kicking and screaming and Michelle will give a speech about how she is no longer proud of America.

 

[ConHog]

Cue the clueless liberal stereotype that ONLY conservatives are on Fox News.

I already said that Fox allows liberals on if they have something negative to say about the President.

Otherwise, they surround a lone liberal voice with five conservatives and call it "fair and balanced"

I've seen Dr. Hill be a staunch defender for Obama, so I do find this interesting.

He is a defender of Obama, and he didn't change that last night, he just said that this week has been the low point and that Obama has done some things to cause that.

 

[rightwinger]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

They are slowly starting to turn on him, but don't expect that to continue.

They all circled the wagons around Carter Reagan ran against him.

I don't know if you are old enough to remember all the dirty tricks they tried to pull against Reagan to make Reagan look bad.

It didn't matter. They couldn't help Carter. He was toast.

Carter conceded the election on the MORNING of the election (I was in Idaho at the time, so it was probably afternoon by that time on the east coast). It's pretty bad when you conceded that early.

Carter knew he didn't have a chance against Reagan.

I can say with certainty that Obama won't concede if he loses in 2012. They will have to drag him out kicking and screaming and Michelle will give a speech about how she is no longer proud of America.

What would make you say that?

 

[ConHog]

They are slowly starting to turn on him, but don't expect that to continue.

They all circled the wagons around Carter Reagan ran against him.

I don't know if you are old enough to remember all the dirty tricks they tried to pull against Reagan to make Reagan look bad.

It didn't matter. They couldn't help Carter. He was toast.

Carter conceded the election on the MORNING of the election (I was in Idaho at the time, so it was probably afternoon by that time on the east coast). It's pretty bad when you conceded that early.

Carter knew he didn't have a chance against Reagan.

I can say with certainty that Obama won't concede if he loses in 2012. They will have to drag him out kicking and screaming and Michelle will give a speech about how she is no longer proud of America.

What would make you say that?

Just based off the way he behaves. He's too arrogant to admit defeat until they show up and tell him to pack his shit.

 

[rightwinger]

I can say with certainty that Obama won't concede if he loses in 2012. They will have to drag him out kicking and screaming and Michelle will give a speech about how she is no longer proud of America.

What would make you say that?

Just based off the way he behaves. He's too arrogant to admit defeat until they show up and tell him to pack his shit.

Complete nonsense. He and his family have never shown anything but class.

Your point is moot however since there is no chance for the GOP to win in 2012

 

[NYcarbineer]

Carbiner, minus is MINUS!

So nice try on that one.

Where is your link??

Where's your link? Stop being an idiot.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[But follow the link to the VERY BOTTOM OF THE PAGE and you will see the table that proves you are DEAD WRONG about Reagan.

ABCNEWS.com : Poll: Reagan's Presidential Ratings

You're link is shit.

Reagan was in the mid 40's in June of 82. On Gallup. Stop lying.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Gallup Historical Statistics and Trends