Getting worse! Rasmussen, now Obama is -15

[teapartysamurai]

Lost two points in two days! Yikes!

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 27% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-two percent (42%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval index rating of -15

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Wow, I wonder if they have Jimmy Carter's numbers on line.

It seems to me Obama is falling FASTER than Carter.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm just curious, if the Rasmussen index was at -18 last December, and it's -15 now,

by what mentally retarded system of mathematics does that translate into 'getting worse'?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm just curious, if the Rasmussen index was at -18 last December, and it's -15 now,

by what mentally retarded system of mathematics does that translate into 'getting worse'?

She is pointing out that it has gotten worse in the last two days....

A real trendspotter there

 

[teapartysamurai]

I'm just curious, if the Rasmussen index was at -18 last December, and it's -15 now,

by what mentally retarded system of mathematics does that translate into 'getting worse'?

I'm not talking about last December, I'm talking about THIS WEEK.

He's lost two points in a couple days.

I'd be very curious to know Jimmy Carter's numbers at this point.

 

[rightwinger]

I'm just curious, if the Rasmussen index was at -18 last December, and it's -15 now,

by what mentally retarded system of mathematics does that translate into 'getting worse'?

I'm not talking about last December, I'm talking about THIS WEEK.

He's lost two points in a couple days.

I'd be very curious to know Jimmy Carter's numbers at this point.

I think Jimmy Carter was doing pretty well at this point. You need to look at Ronald Reagans

 

[teapartysamurai]

I'm just curious, if the Rasmussen index was at -18 last December, and it's -15 now,

by what mentally retarded system of mathematics does that translate into 'getting worse'?

I'm not talking about last December, I'm talking about THIS WEEK.

He's lost two points in a couple days.

I'd be very curious to know Jimmy Carter's numbers at this point.

I think Jimmy Carter was doing pretty well at this point. You need to look at Ronald Reagans

Sorry, I already proved (in the last thread) that Reagan was doing far better.

 

[masquerade]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

 

[rightwinger]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

LOL...Is that why FoxNews had him on?

 

[masquerade]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

LOL...Is that why FoxNews had him on?

Maybe you should email Fox News and ask them why they have a liberal on as a regular guest.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

They are slowly starting to turn on him, but don't expect that to continue.

They all circled the wagons around Carter Reagan ran against him.

I don't know if you are old enough to remember all the dirty tricks they tried to pull against Reagan to make Reagan look bad.

It didn't matter. They couldn't help Carter. He was toast.

Carter conceded the election on the MORNING of the election (I was in Idaho at the time, so it was probably afternoon by that time on the east coast). It's pretty bad when you conceded that early.

Carter knew he didn't have a chance against Reagan.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

LOL...Is that why FoxNews had him on?

Cue the clueless liberal stereotype that ONLY conservatives are on Fox News.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm just curious, if the Rasmussen index was at -18 last December, and it's -15 now,

by what mentally retarded system of mathematics does that translate into 'getting worse'?

I'm not talking about last December, I'm talking about THIS WEEK.

He's lost two points in a couple days.

I'd be very curious to know Jimmy Carter's numbers at this point.

This week?

He was at -21 last Friday. You mean THAT 'this week'?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm not talking about last December, I'm talking about THIS WEEK.

He's lost two points in a couple days.

I'd be very curious to know Jimmy Carter's numbers at this point.

I think Jimmy Carter was doing pretty well at this point. You need to look at Ronald Reagans

Sorry, I already proved (in the last thread) that Reagan was doing far better.

Sorry.....not buying it

"I already proved it" doesn't cut it
You have to provide your link

 

[rightwinger]

Last night O'Reilly had the very liberal Dr. Marc Lamont Hill. One who usually defends the words and actions of the current POTUS, had mostly negative comments last night. He's just one guy I know, but it still speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned.

LOL...Is that why FoxNews had him on?

Cue the clueless liberal stereotype that ONLY conservatives are on Fox News.

I already said that Fox allows liberals on if they have something negative to say about the President.

Otherwise, they surround a lone liberal voice with five conservatives and call it "fair and balanced"

 

[teapartysamurai]

LOL...Is that why FoxNews had him on?

Cue the clueless liberal stereotype that ONLY conservatives are on Fox News.

I already said that Fox allows liberals on if they have something negative to say about the President.

Otherwise, they surround a lone liberal voice with five conservatives and call it "fair and balanced"

Which only proves you don't listen to Fox News.

For the rest of us, we are just going to laugh.

So why do I care if you don't buy that Reagan had far higher numbers than Obama?

But follow the link to the VERY BOTTOM OF THE PAGE and you will see the table that proves you are DEAD WRONG about Reagan.

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Polls/reagan_ratings_poll_040607.html

 

[teapartysamurai]

I'm just curious, if the Rasmussen index was at -18 last December, and it's -15 now,

by what mentally retarded system of mathematics does that translate into 'getting worse'?

I'm not talking about last December, I'm talking about THIS WEEK.

He's lost two points in a couple days.

I'd be very curious to know Jimmy Carter's numbers at this point.

This week?

He was at -21 last Friday. You mean THAT 'this week'?

If he wasn't please provide a link.

But how do you figure -15 is a gain, when it is still MINUS 15?????

 

[rightwinger]

Cue the clueless liberal stereotype that ONLY conservatives are on Fox News.

I already said that Fox allows liberals on if they have something negative to say about the President.

Otherwise, they surround a lone liberal voice with five conservatives and call it "fair and balanced"

Which only proves you don't listen to Fox News.

For the rest of us, we are just going to laugh.

So why do I care if you don't buy that Reagan had far higher numbers than Obama?

But follow the link to the VERY BOTTOM OF THE PAGE and you will see the table that proves you are DEAD WRONG about Reagan.

ABCNEWS.com : Poll: Reagan's Presidential Ratings

Even your own link does not show "far higher" numbers, at best you could claim a draw

Either you are not good at math or you don't let the facts get in the way of your personal hatred

A better comparison of the two

http://www.pollster.com/blogs/obama_as_reagan.php

 

[LibocalypseNow]

I think more & more Americans are getting tired of being called "Racists" and the overall Socialist/Progressive agenda. You can only call good Americans Racists so much. The Socialists/Progressives have definitely over-played their race-card and now people are just p*ssed off. Endless Race-Baiting & "Blame BOOOOOOOOOOSH" wont be enough for them this time around. We need real change in this country. Hopefully this starts in 2010.

 

[rightwinger]

I think more & more Americans are getting tired of being called "Racists" and the overall Socialist/Progressive agenda. You can only call good Americans Racists so much. The Socialists/Progressives have definitely over-played their race-card and now people are just p*ssed off. Endless Race-Baiting & "Blame BOOOOOOOOOOSH" wont be enough for them this time around. We need real change in this country. Hopefully this starts in 2010.

Libo....are you tired of being called a racist?

Its been a long time for you

 

[Sherry]

LOL...Is that why FoxNews had him on?

Cue the clueless liberal stereotype that ONLY conservatives are on Fox News.

I already said that Fox allows liberals on if they have something negative to say about the President.

Otherwise, they surround a lone liberal voice with five conservatives and call it "fair and balanced"

I've seen Dr. Hill be a staunch defender for Obama, so I do find this interesting.