Get out & vote!

Peach

Gold Member
Jan 10, 2009
20,864
2,729
245
IF you have proper identification of course, are willing to be FINGERPRINTED, and do not object to your DNA being stored by the registrar. The polls will be open from 10 am unil noon. The cost of VERIFYING voters has gone up. :D
 
how can any American party think they will win elections by keeping Americans from voting?


The party that does that has a long history of attempting to KEEP voters from voting.

Court documented proof.
 
how can any American party think they will win elections by keeping Americans from voting?


The party that does that has a long history of attempting to KEEP voters from voting.

Court documented proof.
I see no conspiracy, but paranoia strikes deep.
 
IF you have proper identification of course, are willing to be FINGERPRINTED, and do not object to your DNA being stored by the registrar. The polls will be open from 10 am unil noon. The cost of VERIFYING voters has gone up. :D

Just dumb. I know you're trying to be funny but it's just stupid.
 
how can any American party think they will win elections by keeping Americans from voting?


The party that does that has a long history of attempting to KEEP voters from voting.

Court documented proof.
I see no conspiracy, but paranoia strikes deep.

thirty years of court documented proof of the republican partys many many attempts to keep voters from voting is not paranoia
 
how can any American party think they will win elections by keeping Americans from voting?


The party that does that has a long history of attempting to KEEP voters from voting.

Court documented proof.

How about keeping non Americans from voting? Or do you not object to non citizens voting in OUR elections?
 
Cout documented proof!


The courts can sentance you to death.

Yet the right pretends in this case the courts are lying
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?_r=1


In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud

By ERIC LIPTON and IAN URBINA

Published: April 12, 2007


Correction Appended

WASHINGTON, April 11 — Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud, the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews.



Although Republican activists have repeatedly said fraud is so widespread that it has corrupted the political process and, possibly, cost the party election victories, about 120 people have been charged and 86 convicted as of last year.
 
Last edited:
IF you have proper identification of course, are willing to be FINGERPRINTED, and do not object to your DNA being stored by the registrar. The polls will be open from 10 am unil noon. The cost of VERIFYING voters has gone up. :D

Just dumb. I know you're trying to be funny but it's just stupid.
Thank you for your input. *BEEEP*. (Odd how you can read my mind, got this week's lottery numbers to send back?)
*****************************************************
 
how can any American party think they will win elections by keeping Americans from voting?


The party that does that has a long history of attempting to KEEP voters from voting.

Court documented proof.

How about keeping non Americans from voting? Or do you not object to non citizens voting in OUR elections?
How about keeping non Americans from voting? Or do you not object to non citizens voting in OUR elections?
__________________
Better 10 illegal votes be cast than 1 legal vote be barred. (Paraphrasing Blackstone)
 
Facts? You mean like the "fact" that JFK stole an election with blatant voter fraud in Chicago?

Or are you talking about the bullshit claims that your side has been making ever since Bush beat Gore in Florida and Kerry four years later?

The "fact" is, Deanie...that most people have to show two forms of ID to cash a freakin' check at their bank and do so every day but you think it's a GOP plot if they have to show ONE to vote in a national election!
 
Facts? You mean like the "fact" that JFK stole an election with blatant voter fraud in Chicago?

Or are you talking about the bullshit claims that your side has been making ever since Bush beat Gore in Florida and Kerry four years later?

The "fact" is, Deanie...that most people have to show two forms of ID to cash a freakin' check at their bank and do so every day but you think it's a GOP plot if they have to show ONE to vote in a national election!
Blackstone/Franklin, on letting the guilty go free vs. conviction of an innocent man:

The English jurist, William Blackstone. There are many variations on the number (called the "N-Controversy"), for example, Ben Franklin set it at 100.

http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/guilty.ht…
 
Facts? You mean like the "fact" that JFK stole an election with blatant voter fraud in Chicago?

Or are you talking about the bullshit claims that your side has been making ever since Bush beat Gore in Florida and Kerry four years later?

The "fact" is, Deanie...that most people have to show two forms of ID to cash a freakin' check at their bank and do so every day but you think it's a GOP plot if they have to show ONE to vote in a national election!
The "fact" is, Deanie...that most people have to show two forms of ID to cash a freakin' check at their bank and do so every day but you think it's a GOP plot if they have to show ONE to vote in a national election!
******************************************************
If you compare a private business with the right to vote in this nation, you are MISTAKEN. And the Indiana lawsuit was a partisan effort, as noted in both the majority, and dissenting opinions.
 
The scenario:

A very average liberal American voter goes to his/her local polling station and sees a person that they KNOW is not an American citizen enter a voting booth.

Do you nutters think that this average voter will allow this to happen or do you think he/she will report the offense?
 
The scenario:

A very average liberal American voter goes to his/her local polling station and sees a person that they KNOW is not an American citizen enter a voting booth.

Do you nutters think that this average voter will allow this to happen or do you think he/she will report the offense?
They KNOW? How could anyone KNOW? If the supervisor allows them to receive a ballot, you should "report" them? Is spying on on neighbors REQUIRED?
 

Forum List

Back
Top