Get it now republicans ??

So even when Obama presidency is at the end, you are still insisting Bush and Reagan are the reason for our problems.

That's weak. How about electing a man who can actually build something great. Not a other regressive...
 
Get it now dumbasses?




How many were blamed on a video, ignorant dumb Fuck..
74 nations had protests over the video. You ignorant dumb fuck.
. Muddying the water won't help... Focus on Benghazi, where the so called video had nothing to do with that situation. The continued war that is waged by terrorist is evidence of that fact. Got excuses for every other attack ?

enough cartoons or videos to blame on them all eh ?
A lot of those protesters were there for the video. The protest was a great diversion.

Excuses for every other attack? Uh... no and no one's been making them. Why? Are you looking to start another witch hunt?


Now you are trying to change your tune?

What FUCKING witch hunt? I am not the one trying to change/ white wash history like you an the OP are.

Again Hillary knew and Rice went on Sunday talk shows for weeks after saying it was just about a video

Clinton Less Than 24 Hours Later: 'We Know the Attack in Libya Had Nothing to Do With the Film'
 
So even when Obama presidency is at the end, you are still saying Bush and Reagan are the reason for our problems.

That's weak. How about electing a man who can actually make something great.
Obama did an amazing job.

Just you Republicans obstructed denied and complained the entire time.

Stop drinking rush limpballs sweat and urine
 
Get it now dumbasses?




How many were blamed on a video, ignorant dumb Fuck..
74 nations had protests over the video. You ignorant dumb fuck.
. Muddying the water won't help... Focus on Benghazi, where the so called video had nothing to do with that situation. The continued war that is waged by terrorist is evidence of that fact. Got excuses for every other attack ?

enough cartoons or videos to blame on them all eh ?
A lot of those protesters were there for the video. The protest was a great diversion.

Excuses for every other attack? Uh... no and no one's been making them. Why? Are you looking to start another witch hunt?


Now you are trying to change your tune?

What FUCKING witch hunt? I am not the one trying to change/ white wash history like you an the OP are.

Again Hillary knew and Rice went on Sunday talk shows for weeks after saying it was just about a video

Clinton Less Than 24 Hours Later: 'We Know the Attack in Libya Had Nothing to Do With the Film'
Weeks? :doubt:
 
How many were blamed on a video, ignorant dumb Fuck..
74 nations had protests over the video. You ignorant dumb fuck.
. Muddying the water won't help... Focus on Benghazi, where the so called video had nothing to do with that situation. The continued war that is waged by terrorist is evidence of that fact. Got excuses for every other attack ?

enough cartoons or videos to blame on them all eh ?
A lot of those protesters were there for the video. The protest was a great diversion.

Excuses for every other attack? Uh... no and no one's been making them. Why? Are you looking to start another witch hunt?


Now you are trying to change your tune?

What FUCKING witch hunt? I am not the one trying to change/ white wash history like you an the OP are.

Again Hillary knew and Rice went on Sunday talk shows for weeks after saying it was just about a video

Clinton Less Than 24 Hours Later: 'We Know the Attack in Libya Had Nothing to Do With the Film'
Weeks? :doubt:


Want me to prove it? I watched them.
 
Attacks on US diplomatic during Clinton administration as democrat president makes Bush and Reagan look like heroes.

7 August 1998 Nairobi, Kenya al-Qaeda simultaneously attacked both Embassies with truck bombs (more details) bombing 213, including 10 US personnel and 2 US security
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 11

Clinton also allowed thousands of US citizens to die during 9/11 because he refused to kill Bin Laden before Bush came:

Bill Clinton: 'I could have killed' Osama bin Laden in 1998 ...

www.latimes.com/.../la-na-nn-bill-clinton-osama-bin-l...
You didn't even know who bin ladin was before 9-11.

And bush refused to kill bin ladin AFTER 9-11. That was fucked up but he liked having a boogieman to help sell the war on terror.

So obvious.
 
74 nations had protests over the video. You ignorant dumb fuck.
. Muddying the water won't help... Focus on Benghazi, where the so called video had nothing to do with that situation. The continued war that is waged by terrorist is evidence of that fact. Got excuses for every other attack ?

enough cartoons or videos to blame on them all eh ?
A lot of those protesters were there for the video. The protest was a great diversion.

Excuses for every other attack? Uh... no and no one's been making them. Why? Are you looking to start another witch hunt?


Now you are trying to change your tune?

What FUCKING witch hunt? I am not the one trying to change/ white wash history like you an the OP are.

Again Hillary knew and Rice went on Sunday talk shows for weeks after saying it was just about a video

Clinton Less Than 24 Hours Later: 'We Know the Attack in Libya Had Nothing to Do With the Film'
Weeks? :doubt:


Want me to prove it? I watched them.
How many weeks?
 
Get it now dumbasses?



No. But I did have this saved to my notepad. The Bush part of your meme originated from the Daily Kos.

June 14, 2002, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan - Suicide bomber kills 12 and injures 51.

Unlike Benghazi, this attack happened outside the walls of the consulate and yes, twelve people were killed and 51 injured, all Pakistanis. I cannot find any reports of Americans amongst the injured. And we aren't sure how this attack matches up with the graphic above because there were 12 people killed, not 10.

February 20, 2003, international diplomatic compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - Truck bomb kills 17.

This one is only on the list found at Daily Kos and the link to the list above, and we especially love this example because we can't find a single credible reference anywhere in Google that this attack ever happened!

February 28, 2003, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan - Gunmen on motorcycles killed two consulate guards.

Two policemen were killed in this shooting outside the consulate and according to CNN, "none of the staff inside the compound at the time were injured in the attack."

July 30, 2004, U.S. embassy in Taskkent, Uzbekistan - Suicide bomber kills two.

Two Uzbek policemen were killed outside the embassy of both the countries of Israel and the United States.US and Israeli officials said none of their staff were among the casualties.

December 6, 2004, U.S. consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia - Militants stormed and occupied perimeter wall. Five killed, 10 wounded.

This is the only attack on this list and referenced in the graphic where the walls of the embassy were breached and personnel inside were killed, but once again, the graphic and the reference above from The Daily Kos don't match. Four security guards and five staff were killed, none were Americans. By our math, 4 plus 5 equals, 9, not 8 as listed in the graphic and 5 as listed in the reference above.

March 2, 2006, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan - Suicide car bomber killed four, including a U.S. diplomat directly targeted by the assailants.

This is the only attack where an American diplomat, not an Ambassador like Christopher Stevens, was actually killed. Tragically, David Foy was specifically targeted outside the embassy when a massive car bomb went off in the parking lot behind the consulate as he arrived for work.

Isn't it interesting that the only embassy attack where an American was killed under Bush and they don't include it in their completely inaccurate graphic above. You would think they would want that one in there.

September 12, 2006, U.S. embassy in Damascus, Syria - Gunmen attacked embassy with grenades, automatic weapons, and a car bomb (though second truck bomb failed to detonate). One killed and 13 wounded.

Here we go again, another attack listed where not only were no Americans killed, no Americans were even injured. Yes, sadly one brave Saudi security guard was killed doing his job as militants tried to storm the embassy compound. Once again, the embassy wall were never breached and all American personnel inside remained safe.

January 12, 2007, U.S. embassy in Athens, Greece - A rocket-propelled grenade was fired at the embassy building. No one was injured.

Another embassy attack that liberals try to point out in some way is equal to what happened in Benghazi, Libya. While this is a serious event that targeted one of our embassies, it took place early in the morning when a grenade was launched into an empty embassy building. Again, no one was killed or injured.

July 9, 2008, U.S. consulate in Istanbul, Turkey - Armed men attacked consulate with pistols and shotguns. Three policemen killed.

Yet another case where embassy security sadly died, but died in the line of duty. Three Turkish National Policeofficers were killed defending the embassy. All Americans inside remained safe.

March 18, 2008, U.S. embassy in Sana’a, Yemen - Mortar attack misses embassy, hits nearby girls’ school instead.

Though there are reports by liberal websites of 2 being killed at a girl's school near this embassy when mortars were fired at it but missed, the official US Embassy website in Yemen says that there were only injuries.

September 17, 2008, U.S. embassy in Sana’a, Yemen - Militants dressed as policemen attacked the embassy with RPGs, rifles, grenades and car bombs. Six Yemeni soldiers and seven civilians were killed. Sixteen more were injured.

You liberals might what to get your facts straight on this before you post such drivel. How many were killed? The graphic says 10 and the quote above says 11. Actually there weren't 10 people killed, there were 19, six attackers, six Yemeni police, and seven civilians. And guess what, absolutely zero Americans were killedor injured in that attack.

Even though some members of the Yemeni security forces were killed, they did exactly as they were supposed to do, they defended the embassy and saved the personnel inside! And liberals are pointing this out as a sign of weakness? Having security forces do their duty and die during a battle is weakness?

2008 - Rioters set fire to US Embassy in Serbia - (Only listed in graphic above)

Rioters did break into the embassy in this attack and one person was killed, a rioter when they got trapped in a part of one building they had set on fire. All American personnel were safe and accounted for.

There are also 2 more attacks going around the net that liberals are trying to paint as Bush's fault, but once again, neither even remotely holds up to scrutiny as anything even compared to what happened in Benghazi. The first is an attack on what liberals are trying to call the American consulate on January 22, 2002 in Calcutta, India where 5 policemen were killed. In reality it was not the consulate , but an American cultural center that was attacked.

And the final one going around the net is in relation to the bombing of 2 Bali nightclubs on October 12, 2002 when a third much smaller device detonated outside the United States consulate in Denpasar, causing only minor damage.

There you have the graphic and the list, including one attack that never happened, which liberals use to whine and ask why there was no outrage when Bush was president and embassies were attacked. Bush did plenty of things wrong, but he did not lie to all of the country, assisted by a willing press, in order to try and cover up the deaths of 4 Americans.
 
Ambassadors are a pretty high ranking government diplomat. I think you would have to kill a Senator or Vice President to surpass the killing of an Ambassador.

Ambassador Stevens died in Libya while the consulate was under attack by a military force. Thanks Obama.

Ambassador Adolph Dubs murdered in Afghanistan, Thank you Democrat Jimmy Carter.

Your turn, how far back do you have to go to show a Republican President losing an Ambassador.
 
Regardless of how you spin it these past seven plus years have been a foreign policy disaster. To imply otherwise is nothing short of delusional, but then again fits the profile doesn't it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top