Gerald Ford didn't lie or feel a need to lie about this

Oh I can decipher it Gunny...Question is whether or not you can ? See, fact is your, your an old fart. And your days are numbered. And that makes you angry doesnt it. I can see why you are a cynical old prick. Thats what being brainwashed by the govt does to ya. But you will be one less member of society soon enough. If the agent orange didnt get ya, the old age will. Cya ya in the afterlife dipshit..

PWNED !!!!!

You going to do anything other than just insult others? You've had substantive points of your post addressed. Can I assume your lack of concern about the responses is an indication that you concede the points?
 
I have no problems with Self reliance and personal responsibilities. I do have problems with when my own ambitions and personal ideologies are countermanded by billions of dollars of propaganda and public misinformation by people that sit behind walnut desks and interdict in the lives of people like me.

Self reliance and personal responsibility. It destroys socialism by promoting freedom.


Psychoblues
 
I have no problems with Self reliance and personal responsibilities. I do have problems with when my own ambitions and personal ideologies are countermanded by billions of dollars of propaganda and public misinformation by people that sit behind walnut desks and interdict in the lives of people like me.

Psychoblues

The bold-faced text is the relevant portion here. If you want your ambitions and personal ideologies to gain a majority standard in the public, then might I suggest you work to make those thoughts & ideas palatable to the public at-large, and to promote those ideas through publication. One of the advantages of the modern communication age is that we can all become publishers if we desire.

The playing field is more even now, and more geared to promote the free speech of minority opinion than ever before in the history of mankind. Avail yourself of it.

But do not presume that you have some innate right to force other people to listen to you, or consider your ideas simply because you put them forth.
 
You, sir, are a victim and you don't know it yet. Catch you on the uptake.

Psychoblues

The bold-faced text is the relevant portion here. If you want your ambitions and personal ideologies to gain a majority standard in the public, then might I suggest you work to make those thoughts & ideas palatable to the public at-large, and to promote those ideas through publication. One of the advantages of the modern communication age is that we can all become publishers if we desire.

The playing field is more even now, and more geared to promote the free speech of minority opinion than ever before in the history of mankind. Avail yourself of it.

But do not presume that you have some innate right to force other people to listen to you, or consider your ideas simply because you put them forth.

Psychoblues
 
Care to explain that Psycho? Or are you disinterested in replying, or incapable of replying?

Added: I should have stipulated that when I say "replying" I mean "replying intelligently and honestly." I apologize in advance for any confusion this distinction might cause you, Psycho.
 
As a victim, you would be far better off talking to your doctor.

Care to explain that Psycho? Or are you disinterested in replying, or incapable of replying?

Added: I should have stipulated that when I say "replying" I mean "replying intelligently and honestly." I apologize in advance for any confusion this distinction might cause you, Psycho.

I wasn't confused at all which is a far cry better than I can say for you.


Psychoblues
 
As a victim, you would be far better off talking to your doctor.



I wasn't confused at all which is a far cry better than I can say for you.


Psychoblues

Is there something wrong with communicating with him on an intellectual level? He made a valid points and all you can say is he is a victim. How does that further discussion?

Shouldnt the fact he is a victim exalt what he says to unopposable truth according to your liberal idealogy? i guess maybe thats why you have nothing to say. Him being a victim makes him unimpeachable.
 
Is there something wrong with communicating with him on an intellectual level? He made a valid points and all you can say is he is a victim. How does that further discussion?

Shouldnt the fact he is a victim exalt what he says to unopposable truth according to your liberal idealogy? i guess maybe thats why you have nothing to say. Him being a victim makes him unimpeachable.

Actually, I resent some moron who doesn't know me trying to call me a victim. IMHO, the only way one becomes a victim of anything is if they mentally allow someone else to have that level of control over them. And I don't give anyone that kind of control over me.

Actually I doubt Psycho will answer my posts for the same reason that Jillian seems not to answer my posts: both find their liberal (more accurately 'librull') talking points thrashed royally by my own posts. As such they realize that they cannot win in a debate of facts, nor can they stand to see their opinions shown to be based solely on emotional and sensational statements. The modern librull elites share this trait with both Jillian and Psycho. For a group that like to propagandize themselves as being "for open debate," they head for the hills leaving a series of slurs and slanders as their parting smokescreen.

BTW, for readers continued edification, I use the term 'librull' to denote the rabid promoters of far-left-wing ideologies. Consider the relationship of 'librull' to 'liberal' to be on par with the relationship between 'neo-con' and 'conservative.'
 
You are full of it, aren't you, CockySOB? By the way, what does the SOB in your mantra stand for? Figures.

Actually, I resent some moron who doesn't know me trying to call me a victim. IMHO, the only way one becomes a victim of anything is if they mentally allow someone else to have that level of control over them. And I don't give anyone that kind of control over me.

Actually I doubt Psycho will answer my posts for the same reason that Jillian seems not to answer my posts: both find their liberal (more accurately 'librull') talking points thrashed royally by my own posts. As such they realize that they cannot win in a debate of facts, nor can they stand to see their opinions shown to be based solely on emotional and sensational statements. The modern librull elites share this trait with both Jillian and Psycho. For a group that like to propagandize themselves as being "for open debate," they head for the hills leaving a series of slurs and slanders as their parting smokescreen.

BTW, for readers continued edification, I use the term 'librull' to denote the rabid promoters of far-left-wing ideologies. Consider the relationship of 'librull' to 'liberal' to be on par with the relationship between 'neo-con' and 'conservative.'

Psychoblues
 
You are full of it, aren't you, CockySOB? By the way, what does the SOB in your mantra stand for? Figures.

Psychoblues

Hit a nerve did I? Feel free to try to engage me on the field of debate. Although I understand that being unarmed, you might prefer to avoid discussing the distressing things like... oh, facts maybe. :eusa_hand:
 
Please refer to the original post and offer substantive points. Simple, even for a gunnyl.

Psychoblues


I don't remember. That's what happens when you can sneak on mommy and daddy's computer only every couple of weeks. The rest of the world moves on without you.


In other words, please refresh the conversation and lay off the childish insults, gunnyl. I've been temporailly banned from this site for less.


Psychoblues
 
Please refer to the original post and offer substantive points. Simple, even for a gunnyl.

Psychoblues





In other words, please refresh the conversation and lay off the childish insults, gunnyl. I've been temporailly banned from this site for less.


Psychoblues

No you haven't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top