Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
what??THATS WHAT SECURITY DOES,,,TM was standing his ground against the aggressorthat is until he attacked a man with a gun,,,..I am all for being security aware in your neighborhood/etcexcept the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons
...but TM was doing NOTHING wrong..nothing wrong at all
.....of all the shootings of blacks, THIS is the one that should've been protested big time
Z kept going after him in the vehicle and then on FOOT
what??THATS WHAT SECURITY DOES,,,TM was standing his ground against the aggressorthat is until he attacked a man with a gun,,,..I am all for being security aware in your neighborhood/etcexcept the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,
...but TM was doing NOTHING wrong..nothing wrong at all
.....of all the shootings of blacks, THIS is the one that should've been protested big time
Z kept going after him in the vehicle and then on FOOT
1. ID innocent people as ''ASSHOLES''-? NO they don't
2. deduce someone walking is an asshole/threat?? NO they don't
2 keep following INNOCENT people and keep following?? NO they don't
Yes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons
stop right there!!!!!oksee my previous post..I am all for being security aware in your neighborhood/etc
...but TM was doing NOTHING wrong..nothing wrong at all
.....of all the shootings of blacks, THIS is the one that should've been protested big time
He was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's chest beating him "MMA style".
Following someone is not attacking them, not being an "Aggressor".
Z was the aggressor --undeniable--and we don't know what happened when they met--but we do know Z is the aggressor--NOT TM .....but Z is the one who is the aggressor
....without even knowing or meeting TM, he thinks TM is an '''''asshole'''
lastly--Z INITIATED and escalated the problem/incident --so mo matter what, my point is correct that he is an idiot [ cannot think correctly ] and should not carry
1. Following some one is not initiating an incident.
2. What information do you have that Z escalated the incident?
3. Leaving the vehicle to follow a black teenager in the dark? Idiot possibly. But that is not a crime, nor even morally, ethically, or legally wrong.
thats not what caused his death,,,attacking a man with a gun did thatYes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons
opinions vary,,,and since he was found innocent yours means nothingstop right there!!!!!oksee my previous postHe was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's chest beating him "MMA style".
Following someone is not attacking them, not being an "Aggressor".
Z was the aggressor --undeniable--and we don't know what happened when they met--but we do know Z is the aggressor--NOT TM .....but Z is the one who is the aggressor
....without even knowing or meeting TM, he thinks TM is an '''''asshole'''
lastly--Z INITIATED and escalated the problem/incident --so mo matter what, my point is correct that he is an idiot [ cannot think correctly ] and should not carry
1. Following some one is not initiating an incident.
2. What information do you have that Z escalated the incident?
3. Leaving the vehicle to follow a black teenager in the dark? Idiot possibly. But that is not a crime, nor even morally, ethically, or legally wrong.
......yes--If someone keeps following you in their vehicle, then gets out and follows you on FOOT--that DOES initiate an incident........
he could be a thief/murderer/jackass [ and Z was ]
BULLSHIT--you KNOW it starts trouble
also Z said ''these assholes always get away''see my previous post..I am all for being security aware in your neighborhood/etcexcept the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,
...but TM was doing NOTHING wrong..nothing wrong at all
.....of all the shootings of blacks, THIS is the one that should've been protested big time
He was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's chest beating him "MMA style".
Following someone is not attacking them, not being an "Aggressor".
1. without even knowing/meeting TM, he calls him an asshole!!!!!!!!!!--this clearly shows Z is an IDIOT !!!!!!!!!!!!
2. he doesn't want TM to get away and will keep going after him
TM has a right to stand his ground---no?
stop right there!!!!!oksee my previous postHe was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's chest beating him "MMA style".
Following someone is not attacking them, not being an "Aggressor".
Z was the aggressor --undeniable--and we don't know what happened when they met--but we do know Z is the aggressor--NOT TM .....but Z is the one who is the aggressor
....without even knowing or meeting TM, he thinks TM is an '''''asshole'''
lastly--Z INITIATED and escalated the problem/incident --so mo matter what, my point is correct that he is an idiot [ cannot think correctly ] and should not carry
1. Following some one is not initiating an incident.
2. What information do you have that Z escalated the incident?
3. Leaving the vehicle to follow a black teenager in the dark? Idiot possibly. But that is not a crime, nor even morally, ethically, or legally wrong.
......yes--If someone keeps following you in their vehicle, then gets out and follows you on FOOT--that DOES initiate an incident........
he could be a thief/murderer/jackass [ and Z was ]
BULLSHIT--you KNOW it starts trouble
LolYes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons
1. Z is NO copwhat??THATS WHAT SECURITY DOES,,,TM was standing his ground against the aggressorthat is until he attacked a man with a gun,,,..I am all for being security aware in your neighborhood/etc
...but TM was doing NOTHING wrong..nothing wrong at all
.....of all the shootings of blacks, THIS is the one that should've been protested big time
Z kept going after him in the vehicle and then on FOOT
1. ID innocent people as ''ASSHOLES''-? NO they don't
2. deduce someone walking is an asshole/threat?? NO they don't
2 keep following INNOCENT people and keep following?? NO they don't
cops call people assholes all the time,,,,
all he was doing was walkingLolYes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons
The little gang banger got his just deserves... He’s taking a dirt nap right now
who said he tried to stop him???1. Z is NO copwhat??THATS WHAT SECURITY DOES,,,TM was standing his ground against the aggressorthat is until he attacked a man with a gun,,,
Z kept going after him in the vehicle and then on FOOT
1. ID innocent people as ''ASSHOLES''-? NO they don't
2. deduce someone walking is an asshole/threat?? NO they don't
2 keep following INNOCENT people and keep following?? NO they don't
cops call people assholes all the time,,,,
2. he has really no authority to stop anyone--with or without probable cause
here--just like this idiot with a pistol who is a cop WANNABE--this is JUST like Zim
...if someone tells you that you can't park here or there, people usually tell the jackass to FOFF--Z and this guy are armed, and starting shit:
Amazon driver sues man who shot him over handicapped spot in St. Charles
that's just it !!!!!!!stop right there!!!!!oksee my previous post
Following someone is not attacking them, not being an "Aggressor".
Z was the aggressor --undeniable--and we don't know what happened when they met--but we do know Z is the aggressor--NOT TM .....but Z is the one who is the aggressor
....without even knowing or meeting TM, he thinks TM is an '''''asshole'''
lastly--Z INITIATED and escalated the problem/incident --so mo matter what, my point is correct that he is an idiot [ cannot think correctly ] and should not carry
1. Following some one is not initiating an incident.
2. What information do you have that Z escalated the incident?
3. Leaving the vehicle to follow a black teenager in the dark? Idiot possibly. But that is not a crime, nor even morally, ethically, or legally wrong.
......yes--If someone keeps following you in their vehicle, then gets out and follows you on FOOT--that DOES initiate an incident........
he could be a thief/murderer/jackass [ and Z was ]
BULLSHIT--you KNOW it starts trouble
he could be a lot of things,,,still no reason to attack him
up until he attacked zimmerman,,,all he was doing was walkingLolYes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons
The little gang banger got his just deserves... He’s taking a dirt nap right now
that's just it !!!!!!!stop right there!!!!!okFollowing someone is not attacking them, not being an "Aggressor".
Z was the aggressor --undeniable--and we don't know what happened when they met--but we do know Z is the aggressor--NOT TM .....but Z is the one who is the aggressor
....without even knowing or meeting TM, he thinks TM is an '''''asshole'''
lastly--Z INITIATED and escalated the problem/incident --so mo matter what, my point is correct that he is an idiot [ cannot think correctly ] and should not carry
1. Following some one is not initiating an incident.
2. What information do you have that Z escalated the incident?
3. Leaving the vehicle to follow a black teenager in the dark? Idiot possibly. But that is not a crime, nor even morally, ethically, or legally wrong.
......yes--If someone keeps following you in their vehicle, then gets out and follows you on FOOT--that DOES initiate an incident........
he could be a thief/murderer/jackass [ and Z was ]
BULLSHIT--you KNOW it starts trouble
he could be a lot of things,,,still no reason to attack him
you don't know who attacked whom
we DO know Z is the aggressor/INITIATOR
stop right there!!!!!oksee my previous postHe was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's chest beating him "MMA style".
Following someone is not attacking them, not being an "Aggressor".
Z was the aggressor --undeniable--and we don't know what happened when they met--but we do know Z is the aggressor--NOT TM .....but Z is the one who is the aggressor
....without even knowing or meeting TM, he thinks TM is an '''''asshole'''
lastly--Z INITIATED and escalated the problem/incident --so mo matter what, my point is correct that he is an idiot [ cannot think correctly ] and should not carry
1. Following some one is not initiating an incident.
2. What information do you have that Z escalated the incident?
3. Leaving the vehicle to follow a black teenager in the dark? Idiot possibly. But that is not a crime, nor even morally, ethically, or legally wrong.
......yes--If someone keeps following you in their vehicle, then gets out and follows you on FOOT--that DOES initiate an incident........
he could be a thief/murderer/jackass [ and Z was ]
BULLSHIT--you KNOW it starts trouble
STANDING his groundup until he attacked zimmerman,,,all he was doing was walkingLolYes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons
The little gang banger got his just deserves... He’s taking a dirt nap right now
STANDING his groundup until he attacked zimmerman,,,all he was doing was walkingLolYes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,
The little gang banger got his just deserves... He’s taking a dirt nap right now
....this is the PERFECT example of standing your ground---the idiot keeps going after TM...and keeps going and keeps going !!!!!!
thats what security does,,,STANDING his groundup until he attacked zimmerman,,,all he was doing was walkingLolYes...how dare he walk thru his father's neighborhood with Skittles and a Snapple...and...WITH A HOODIE ON!except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,
The little gang banger got his just deserves... He’s taking a dirt nap right now
....this is the PERFECT example of standing your ground---the idiot keeps going after TM...and keeps going and keeps going !!!!!!
