George W. Obama Threatens War over Syrian WMD’s

Ahh... How soon we forget Saddam and his killing of the Kurds... And especially the similarities... Obama's second term is simply Bush's fourth one. Enjoy the ride my leftist hypocrite friends.

Don't fool yourself, the Kurds were no angels. They engaged in a long campaign of what were clearly terrorist attacks on Hussein.

Be that as it may, Hussein was a brutal bastard with no regard for the lives of a large portion of his own people.

However, the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with stopping Hussein from using WMD on the Kurds. If that were the case, then we would have invaded a decade before, when he was killing them en masse.
 
Killing by the dozen doesn't qualify in your book huh idiot?

so·ci·o·path /ˈsōsēōˌpaTH/
Noun:
A person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

Being a dictator desperately trying to hold on to power, and killing thousands of people during a civil war, does not qualify one as a sociopath.

Certainly he exhibits the "lack of conscience" quality in his actions over the past year or so, but he has not generally just killed people for no reason other than that he hates people in general.

Certainly I believe Assad is a brutal asshole, and that he should have stepped down already (or been killed preferably), but he's not a sociopath.

Therefore, if there is no reason for him to kill people, and doing so would assure his destruction, then there is no reason to believe he would just start engaging in the use of WMD.

Yet he fits the definition AND is killing people. Perhaps you should reference oblivious hack?
 
Yet he fits the definition AND is killing people. Perhaps you should reference oblivious hack?

He is killing people for a reason. Syria is in the grips of a Civil War.

I don't happen to agree with that reason, but it is still there.

He has not been indiscriminately killing people for years prior to this, with no reason evident.

Therefore, unless you can prove otherwise, he is not insane.

Lincoln was not a sociopath, nor was King Charles of England, nor Louis XIV. They were all fighting civil wars against their respective governments.
 
I don't think Obama has the brass to invade Syria berause of the poison gas issue. He will whine and cry going to the UN for help while thousands die.
Obama is famous for leading from behind. He did the same with the invasion of Georgia, the Iranian Spring and every Arab Spring since. He did however, get caught shipping arms to Syria from Libya by ordering the CIA to do so. Oh well, he lost 4 Amerricans in the process and nearly lost the election if it weren't for his compliant MSM that covered his lies. What 4 Americans worth as against Obama winning the Election? It wasn't the incident it's all about the lies and cover-up by Obama. Just like Nixon he's got to go. At least in the case of Watergate no one was assassinated.
 
George W. Obama Threatens War over Syrian WMD’s​



By Daniel Greenfield



Obama’s big anti-war moment that won him the backing of the left.

Where are those WMD’s, the left clamored for 9 years. Well they might just be about to find out.

U.S. and allied intelligence have detected Syrian movement of chemical weapons components in recent days, a senior U.S. defence official said Monday, as the Obama administration again warned the Assad regime against using them.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, in Prague for meetings with Czech officials, reiterated President Barack Obama’s declaration that Syrian action on chemical weapons was a “red line” for the United States that would prompt action.

“We have made our views very clear: This is a red line for the United States,” Clinton told reporters. “I’m not going to telegraph in any specifics what we would do in the event of credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons against their own people. But suffice it to say, we are certainly planning to take action if that eventuality were to occur.”​

Can you spot what’s missing from the story that was and is present in every news story on Iraqi or Iranian WMDs?

1. No “experts” stepping forward to question the “intelligence” about the presence of WMD.

2. No news reports on anti-war protesters gathering to protest against a war on Syria, even though they exist.

3. No questions about whether we should route this through the United Nations​

When Democrats want to go to war, it’s very simple. They announce that they’re going to war. Or they go to war, then say three days later that there is no war, just a No Fly Zone, as Obama did during his disastrous Libyan expedition.

President Barack Obama, in a speech at the National Defense University on Monday, pointedly warned Syrian President Bashar Assad not to use his arsenal.

“Today I want to make it absolutely clear to Assad and those under his command: The world is watching,” Obama said. “The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable. And if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable.”​

Read more:
George W. Obama Threatens War over Syrian WMD’s

If we were to invade Syria, it's possible we could find the Iraqi WMDS we never found.
 
Might be able to save a few thousand lives doing it BEFORE. Just a thought from us dumbasses.

She is saving a "few thousand lives" by confirming that we will attack if he uses them.

If he tries to use them, he will be annihilated, therefore it's a lose, lose situation, so there would be no point.

lol, assad is already in a lose, lose situation. That is exactly the type of situation that would give the man nothing to lose, and a reason to use WMD.
 
George W. Obama Threatens War over Syrian WMD’s​



By Daniel Greenfield



Obama’s big anti-war moment that won him the backing of the left.

Where are those WMD’s, the left clamored for 9 years. Well they might just be about to find out.

U.S. and allied intelligence have detected Syrian movement of chemical weapons components in recent days, a senior U.S. defence official said Monday, as the Obama administration again warned the Assad regime against using them.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, in Prague for meetings with Czech officials, reiterated President Barack Obama’s declaration that Syrian action on chemical weapons was a “red line” for the United States that would prompt action.

“We have made our views very clear: This is a red line for the United States,” Clinton told reporters. “I’m not going to telegraph in any specifics what we would do in the event of credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons against their own people. But suffice it to say, we are certainly planning to take action if that eventuality were to occur.”​

Can you spot what’s missing from the story that was and is present in every news story on Iraqi or Iranian WMDs?

1. No “experts” stepping forward to question the “intelligence” about the presence of WMD.

2. No news reports on anti-war protesters gathering to protest against a war on Syria, even though they exist.

3. No questions about whether we should route this through the United Nations​

When Democrats want to go to war, it’s very simple. They announce that they’re going to war. Or they go to war, then say three days later that there is no war, just a No Fly Zone, as Obama did during his disastrous Libyan expedition.

President Barack Obama, in a speech at the National Defense University on Monday, pointedly warned Syrian President Bashar Assad not to use his arsenal.

“Today I want to make it absolutely clear to Assad and those under his command: The world is watching,” Obama said. “The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable. And if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable.”​

Read more:
George W. Obama Threatens War over Syrian WMD’s

If we were to invade Syria, it's possible we could find the Iraqi WMDS we never found.

Neo con wet dream.
 
lol, assad is already in a lose, lose situation. That is exactly the type of situation that would give the man nothing to lose, and a reason to use WMD.

That makes no sense whatsoever.

Ask yourself this:

What are Assad's motives?

What would best serve said motives?

What would Assad gain by using WMD?

Would the nations that are currently supporting the Assad regime still support it if he used WMD?
 
Ahh... How soon we forget Saddam and his killing of the Kurds... And especially the similarities... Obama's second term is simply Bush's fourth one. Enjoy the ride my leftist hypocrite friends.

Don't fool yourself, the Kurds were no angels. They engaged in a long campaign of what were clearly terrorist attacks on Hussein.

Bullshit, the Kurds targeted Iraqi Military, and Bath Party targets. The did not deliberately target civilians.

I swear you guys like to call real Terrorists freedom Fighters, but real Freedom fighters in your book are nothing but Terrorists.

lol
 
lol, assad is already in a lose, lose situation. That is exactly the type of situation that would give the man nothing to lose, and a reason to use WMD.

That makes no sense whatsoever.

Ask yourself this:

What are Assad's motives?

What would best server said motives?

What would Assad gain by using WMD?

Would the nations that are currently supporting the Assad regime still support it if he used WMD?

Assad's days are numbered. All he has to do is look to what happened to Gaddaffi, Saddam and others. That being the case, the better question is not what he has to gain by using them, it is what does he have to lose.

You guys make me laugh, when we invaded Iraq, the left were freaking out telling us we might back Saddam into a corner and force him to use WMDS, now that it is a Dem in the WH, who might back Assad into a corner, you suddenly don't see a reason for Assad to use WMD.
lol
 
He is killing people for a reason. Syria is in the grips of a Civil War.

I don't happen to agree with that reason, but it is still there.

He has not been indiscriminately killing people for years prior to this, with no reason evident.

Therefore, unless you can prove otherwise, he is not insane.

Lincoln was not a sociopath, nor was King Charles of England, nor Louis XIV. They were all fighting civil wars against their respective governments.

Just so you look a little less stupid next time, Lincoln was not at war against his government. Nor were the other folks mentioned.

How you can ever attempt to logically explain war against your own people for the sole benefit of yourself is laughable. Most of the government has fallen away from Assad.
 
He is killing people for a reason. Syria is in the grips of a Civil War.

I don't happen to agree with that reason, but it is still there.

He has not been indiscriminately killing people for years prior to this, with no reason evident.

Therefore, unless you can prove otherwise, he is not insane.

Lincoln was not a sociopath, nor was King Charles of England, nor Louis XIV. They were all fighting civil wars against their respective governments.

Just so you look a little less stupid next time, Lincoln was not at war against his government. Nor were the other folks mentioned.

How you can ever attempt to logically explain war against your own people for the sole benefit of yourself is laughable. Most of the government has fallen away from Assad.

Yes, yes, it was a typo, it should have read: "They were all fighting civil wars that were being fought against their respective governments."

Cut and paste errors happen.
 
Assad's days are numbered. All he has to do is look to what happened to Gaddaffi, Saddam and others. That being the case, the better question is not what he has to gain by using them, it is what does he have to lose.

You guys make me laugh, when we invaded Iraq, the left were freaking out telling us we might back Saddam into a corner and force him to use WMDS, now that it is a Dem in the WH, who might back Assad into a corner, you suddenly don't see a reason for Assad to use WMD.
lol

There have been a host of cases where dictators have been given haven in other nations in return for giving up peacefully.

Perhaps he could find a home in Russia or China.

This might be the case for him, but would never happen if he used WMDs.
 
obama-anti-war3-500x375-450x337.jpg

Obama’s big anti-war moment that won him the backing of the left.​

...:D
 
Listen all, it is American Tradition for every president to invade a country and rape it during every term, if we break this tradition, then we no longer deserve to call ourselves Americans.

ATTACK !!!!!
 
Syrian Rebels and Chemical Weapons


May 7, 2013 By Walid and Theodore Shoebat

...

The report was based on former war crimes prosecutor Carla Del Ponte who told Swiss TV that a UN commission has indications Syrian rebel forces used nerve agent sarin as a weapon.

Yet when Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel read a letter sent by the White House to Congress, he stated that the Syrian regime likely used chemical weapons. Such unconfirmed allegations were also passed to President Obama who described the situation as a “red line” and a “game changer” — only to later temper his statement down by stating: “We don’t have a chain of custody that establishes what exactly happened.”

...

And what about the arsenals captured by the rebels? We have showed the use of Scud missiles never seen on western media as well as major missile cache obtained by rebel forces.

The growing evidence suggests that it is the Syrian rebels who are guilty of using chemical weapons against civilians. The Obama administration would do well to stand back before it punishes the wrong party and, by so doing, continues its lethal habit of making matters worse rather than better, by strengthening and emboldening our deadliest enemies in the Middle East.

...

Syrian Rebels and Chemical Weapons | FrontPage Magazine
 
Obama Official Admits They Would Have Lied About “Red Line” Breach

June 14, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield

ap_barack_obama_jordan_ll_130322_wblog-450x253.jpg


...

This isn’t about chemical weapons. It’s about more Muslim Brotherhood regime change. And now there is the closest thing we’ll get to an admission from the halls of Obama Inc.

The decision was ultimately driven by the discovery Assad used [chemical weapons] but there were a number of other factors in place that were also important,” conceded an administration official with direct knowledge of the deliberations. “Would we have made [the determination Assad had breached the red line] even if we didn’t have the evidence? Probably.”

...

But Obama’s people can openly admit that they were planning to lie the country into a war and it’s buried.

Obama Official Admits They Would Have Lied About ?Red Line? Breach | FrontPage Magazine
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top