CDZ Genocide

[JimBowie1958]

The line was so vile, so despicable that I couldn't forget it anymore even after 2 or 3 years:

"What I hope to see is a tremendous increase in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

So vile and despicable? People choosing to have sex with those that are not the same race are vile and despicable?

And you claim that you are not racist. It is clear that you are - seeing the mere the act of sexual relations between people of other races vile and despicable is exactly what racism is.

He objected to this statement:
"What I hope to see is a tremendous increase in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

Suppose he had said he objected instead to its opposite that...
"What I hope to see is a tremendous decrease in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

Then you would be OK with his objection?

I object to both. What race people are shouldnt matter as far as any laws or policies go. The law should be race neutral and people need to mind their own business.

But there is nothing sinister in objecting to racists who say that they want to see one race fall into smaller and smaller numbers, even if they are cheer leading for white genocide.

 

[FA_Q2]

The line was so vile, so despicable that I couldn't forget it anymore even after 2 or 3 years:

"What I hope to see is a tremendous increase in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

So vile and despicable? People choosing to have sex with those that are not the same race are vile and despicable?

And you claim that you are not racist. It is clear that you are - seeing the mere the act of sexual relations between people of other races vile and despicable is exactly what racism is.

He objected to this statement:
"What I hope to see is a tremendous increase in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

Suppose he had said he objected instead to its opposite that...
"What I hope to see is a tremendous decrease in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

Then you would be OK with his objection?

I object to both. What race people are shouldnt matter as far as any laws or policies go. The law should be race neutral and people need to mind their own business.

But there is nothing sinister in objecting to racists who say that they want to see one race fall into smaller and smaller numbers, even if they are cheer leading for white genocide.

Objecting is one thing. He found it vile. There is a vast difference in stating that the statement was a poor one because race should not matter. He was stating it was vile because race should matter.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Mixed marriage is an offense to Nazi's and Neo-Nazi's.
So whenever one of them starts harping about it then you know you have got a Neo-Nazi by the toe.

I am not a neoNazi and I dont think that inter-racial marriages should be illegal.

BUT, I do find it disturbing how often we see happy harmonious white female/black male inter-racial marriages and not nearly so often black female/white male relationships shown to us on TV shows and commercials. The most common inter-racial couples portrayed for white men is with Asian females and Asian men are hardly ever depicted with white women. And of course white men / white women marriages alays have something wrong with them. He is either an ass hole consumed by ambition or she is a nag who berates her husband day and night and insults him and humiliates him in public, or they are good at keeping a clean public image but are secretly no longer in love and just going through the motions, etc, fill in the trope. A peaceful, happy, loving relationship is most often portrayed in mixed relationships today; Father Knows Best is seen as a silly old piece of fantasy.

Why are these stereotypes pushed so hard by the mass media?

It would seem that they are subtly encouraging mixed race marriage and that dove tails with the declarations by many leftists that whiteness must be destroyed, open calls to white genocide by nonviolent means. Some leaders in the further left, like in Black Lives Matter, claim that white people need to have their property seized and then run out of the country as this continent wasnot meant for whites, they say.

So if whites get upset by this and posts about it and complain about it, your immediate response is that they are neoNazis and you put them on ignore?

Well, fine, if that is what you want to do, but you should be aware that these old attitudes you have are quite obsolete. The majority of white people concerned by these topics are not anywhere near some kind of Nazi at all. They just want to maintain their ethnicity as Nature gives them that instinct to do.

That instinct is pretty strong. I was raised to not place any restrictions on my personal associations, including race, and I found myself dating a very nice black woman while I was on an assignment in the Army. She was intelligent, very polite and the perfect Southern Bell type of person and she liked me, it seemed. Then I came to that moment when I had to decide if I wanted to pursue things further. To my surprise I realized I wanted to have white children that looked like the other people in my family. I dont particularly get along with my family so it was shocking to me that this feeling was so strong. But there it was. I wanted to have white children and she could never do that, so I kept the relationship at just friends, though I bet she might have very well had the same feelings too upon reflection.

Our media today seems to be doing its best to encourage white men to mate with Asian women and white women to mate with black men. Again, I dont see this as something criminal, unethical or immoral, I just wonder why it is. Then I read the liberals explaining why whiteness must die and it suddenly makes sense.

And that makes me a Nazi?

roflmao

Jim, you are watching too much TV.


Sent from my Nexus 6P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[JimBowie1958]

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.
Is blatantly false. The majority of crime experienced by white people is at the hands of other white people. That is simply a fact just as the majority of black crime is actually against other blacks. It has to do with the higher violent crime in poorer neighborhoods and that those poorer neighborhoods tend to self segregate.

That is not what he said. HE said that whites had a non-equal rate of victimization by nonwhites, than nonwhites have by whites. What you stated, that most white victims of crime are victimized by other whites, is true but does not contradict the original claim as both can be true and are.

D - White Americans are subject to an obscene amount of propaganda demanding miscegenation.
No, they are not. This is another asinine assertion you simply put out there without anything supporting it. Interracial marriages and children are going to happen, end of story. What is more interesting to me is that you are doing exactly what you seem to be claiming others are - your post reeks of demonizing mixing races without any real cause.

Yes, it is true and no, the major media does not conduct studies on itself to expose their latest Progressive Propaganda goals and methods. But they have been driving social change since at lest 1968 and probably before that as well, but they promoted GOOD change prior to that. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was good stuff, but the Progressive Left morphed into the Regressive Left and began demanding things that harmed the demographic growth of the white population and others as well.

The legalization of abortion, pornography, sexual deviance, etc were all connected by their destructive effects on demographic growth and it was not an accident.

E - White Americans are subject to forcible education, or reeducation of their very own children to achieve what are obvious genocidal goals.
...
And you cap it off with another even more loony assertion.

It is not loony at all. Other races are also subjected to the Social Marxist propaganda as well as whites is the only correction I would make.

Considering that the whites still account for 70 percent of the nation it is rather asinine to demand that they are being subjected to genocide. You want to know why whites are falling in percentages from other races? It is not because or genocide (and that is blatantly obvious). It is not because

You do know what statistical projections are, right? The percentage of whites in this country used to be much higher and is falling. Taking a snapshot in that progression and claiming that we are a majority does nothing to contradict that assertion that the progression has negative growth.

BTW, your Goldstein article has been removed because it is hate propaganda. Yes, such propaganda does exist but its mere existence does not indicate that the country is following it. The very fact it was removed from the location that you linked shows that such garbage is not tolerated. It is not as another poster suggested "flood[ing] a white majority country like America with non-white immigration." The reality is far simpler:

The best way to defeat propaganda is to anaylze it, show its flaws and DEFEAT IT IN THE FREE MARKET PLACE OF IDEAS.

People that ban speech are in effect endorsing it more than any proponent because they are admitting that the opponent has better arguments that the people in charge cannot beat. I have been having discussions with racists for decades now and they can and should be defeated in discussion, not banned like they were too persuasive.

White culture does not promote having as many children as black or Mexican culture. That is it. Whites simply do not have as many children.
Explaining Why Minority Births Now Outnumber White Births

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/05/17/explaining-why-minority-births-now-outnumber-white-births/

An example of how many whites lived prior to WW2.

My mother had 5 children, and white families with ten or more kids were once fairly common to find, though the minority. They are much more rare today due to the changes in expected life style as whites became middle class. Most people would rather have a better quality of life than more kids. As Hispanics move into the middle class they reduce the number of their children as well, though slower. They dont accept Anglo norms for their families, which is good for them.

Hispanics, especially, tend to be catholic and value very large families. Whites, on the other hand, are shifting to value career more and more and a large family less and less.

What is it about speaking Spanish that makes a person no longer white? No one has ever answered that question satisfactorily to me.

An Italian family can move to Argentina and still be white. But after they shift to speaking Spanish and then immigrate to the USA they are no longer white?

What freaking sense does that make?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Objecting is one thing. He found it vile. There is a vast difference in stating that the statement was a poor one because race should not matter. He was stating it was vile because race should matter.

When I was in high school, 40 something years ago, that would have been the interpretation, that he was being a racist, because most people who said such things were racists. Statistics were overwhelmingly on your side if you thought that.

Today with all the violence people are witnessing in Europe and the US, that is not a good assumption to make any more.

 

[bt404]

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.
Is blatantly false. The majority of crime experienced by white people is at the hands of other white people. That is simply a fact just as the majority of black crime is actually against other blacks. It has to do with the higher violent crime in poorer neighborhoods and that those poorer neighborhoods tend to self segregate.

That is not what he said. HE said that whites had a non-equal rate of victimization by nonwhites, than nonwhites have by whites. What you stated, that most white victims of crime are victimized by other whites, is true but does not contradict the original claim as both can be true and are.

D - White Americans are subject to an obscene amount of propaganda demanding miscegenation.
No, they are not. This is another asinine assertion you simply put out there without anything supporting it. Interracial marriages and children are going to happen, end of story. What is more interesting to me is that you are doing exactly what you seem to be claiming others are - your post reeks of demonizing mixing races without any real cause.

Yes, it is true and no, the major media does not conduct studies on itself to expose their latest Progressive Propaganda goals and methods. But they have been driving social change since at lest 1968 and probably before that as well, but they promoted GOOD change prior to that. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was good stuff, but the Progressive Left morphed into the Regressive Left and began demanding things that harmed the demographic growth of the white population and others as well.

The legalization of abortion, pornography, sexual deviance, etc were all connected by their destructive effects on demographic growth and it was not an accident.

E - White Americans are subject to forcible education, or reeducation of their very own children to achieve what are obvious genocidal goals.
...
And you cap it off with another even more loony assertion.

It is not loony at all. Other races are also subjected to the Social Marxist propaganda as well as whites is the only correction I would make.

Considering that the whites still account for 70 percent of the nation it is rather asinine to demand that they are being subjected to genocide. You want to know why whites are falling in percentages from other races? It is not because or genocide (and that is blatantly obvious). It is not because

You do know what statistical projections are, right? The percentage of whites in this country used to be much higher and is falling. Taking a snapshot in that progression and claiming that we are a majority does nothing to contradict that assertion that the progression has negative growth.

BTW, your Goldstein article has been removed because it is hate propaganda. Yes, such propaganda does exist but its mere existence does not indicate that the country is following it. The very fact it was removed from the location that you linked shows that such garbage is not tolerated. It is not as another poster suggested "flood[ing] a white majority country like America with non-white immigration." The reality is far simpler:

The best way to defeat propaganda is to anaylze it, show its flaws and DEFEAT IT IN THE FREE MARKET PLACE OF IDEAS.

People that ban speech are in effect endorsing it more than any proponent because they are admitting that the opponent has better arguments that the people in charge cannot beat. I have been having discussions with racists for decades now and they can and should be defeated in discussion, not banned like they were too persuasive.

White culture does not promote having as many children as black or Mexican culture. That is it. Whites simply do not have as many children.
Explaining Why Minority Births Now Outnumber White Births

An example of how many whites lived prior to WW2.
View attachment 113013

My mother had 5 children, and white families with ten or more kids were once fairly common to find, though the minority. They are much more rare today due to the changes in expected life style as whites became middle class. Most people would rather have a better quality of life than more kids. As Hispanics move into the middle class they reduce the number of their children as well, though slower. They dont accept Anglo norms for their families, which is good for them.

Hispanics, especially, tend to be catholic and value very large families. Whites, on the other hand, are shifting to value career more and more and a large family less and less.

What is it about speaking Spanish that makes a person no longer white? No one has ever answered that question satisfactorily to me.

An Italian family can move to Argentina and still be white. But after they shift to speaking Spanish and then immigrate to the USA they are no longer white?

What freaking sense does that make?

HE said that whites had a non-equal rate of victimization by nonwhites, than nonwhites have by whites. What you stated, that most white victims of crime are victimized by other whites, is true but does not contradict the original claim as both can be true and are.

Where is the statistics that imply that whites are victimized more often by nonwhites than nonwhites by whites? Do you have any evidence at all? What an obtuse conjecture.

Yes, it is true and no, the major media does not conduct studies on itself to expose their latest Progressive Propaganda goals and methods. But they have been driving social change since at lest 1968 and probably before that as well, but they promoted GOOD change prior to that. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was good stuff, but the Progressive Left morphed into the Regressive Left and began demanding things that harmed the demographic growth of the white population and others as well.

The legalization of abortion, pornography, sexual deviance, etc were all connected by their destructive effects on demographic growth and it was not an accident.

This statement is completely devoid of historical context. You say the left has been driving social change since 1968 and that after the 64' Civil Rights movement, that the left went "regressive." Interesting that you blame everything since then on the left. As far as I know, Reagan's economic policies in the early 80s resulted in a massive deliberate shift of wealth to the corporate and elite sector, which resulted in policies that eventually led to the outsourcing of those precious manufacturing jobs that so many Trump supporters want back and who blame the left for....

You say the "legalization of abortion, porn" and so on is the reason why we have such massive wealth inequality today? What the hell are you talking about? I revert to my statement above. The regressive right, which has been regressing since Reagan and continues to do so, is responsible for just as much of the infrastructural stagnation, wealth disparity, and corporate-influenced politics as the left, if not more. This is mainly due to the immense influence of corporate banking and finance in government, the same type of people who were responsible for nearly tanking our economy in 2008. Yet, you put the blame on all this on people who believe in a woman's right to her own body?? Fuck outta here.

It is not loony at all. Other races are also subjected to the Social Marxist propaganda as well as whites is the only correction I would make.

What is a "social marxist" propaganda? Do you even know what a Marxist is? Please define it for me in detail and then we can have a discussion. Until then, the assertion made above is indeed outrageously looney.

You do know what statistical projections are, right? The percentage of whites in this country used to be much higher and is falling. Taking a snapshot in that progression and claiming that we are a majority does nothing to contradict that assertion that the progression has negative growth.

Percentage of whites is falling because white people from Europe aren't moving here as much as they used to. There's no deliberate "removal" of white people. And to even put use the word "genocide" is an insult to actual groups of people who WERE deliberately removed, by immense violence, off their land, based on the racist assertion that they were "savages" and couldn't be civilized....

 

[José]

Originally posted by bt44
I've never talked to an actual neo-nazi before.

Of course you did.

You see a neo-nazi every morning when you wake up and stop in front of the mirror.

You haven't done anything here but make up excuses and rationalizations to sugar coat the genocide of a racial, national group you don't think has a right to exist, the white people of North America.

The perfect definition of a Nazi.

 

[José]

And to add insult to injury the little buggers project their murderous ideology on people like D Truth and me who are actually trying to stop the genocide.

 

[bt404]

And to add insult to injury the little buggers project their murderous ideology on people like D Truth and me who are actually trying to stop the genocide.

No, if you actually took the time to read carefully the post I made above (I know you neo nazis have a hard time actually reading and utilize critical thinking) you'd know that I'm not making excuses for anybody. You made a statement and backed it up with zero evidence. I responded, with clear historic and factual evidence, and you neglect to respond to any of them. That says way more about you I'm afraid.

 

[Toronado3800]

Do you all sometimes not want a tall girl, then two days later a short girl, then next week a white girl, then black, then hispanic, then cuddly, then tiny. Essentially whatever you don't have?

 

[Deleted member 61768]

How about the systematic killing of Christians by crucifixion, mass shooting, beheading, burning alive, selling into sex slavery, mass rape of women due to their religious beliefs by those claiming to be followers of Islam going on Syria and Western Iraq.