CDZ Genocide

[D Truth]

Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.

B - White Americans are subject to extreme propaganda at the hands of media conglomerates denigrating them on racial basis. Observe, every feckin sitcom, commercial, or any media published through mainstream means... mostly targeted at women and children.

C - White Americans are subject to obviously racist affirmative action laws.

D - White Americans are subject to an obscene amount of propaganda demanding miscegenation.

E - White Americans are subject to forcible education, or reeducation of their very own children to achieve what are obvious genocidal goals.

By every condition, White Americans are being subjected to genocide. The supporting evidence is the often celebrated demographic changes which are reported and "projected".
If the media celebrates a racial demographic change, are they not complicit in genocide?

So, now we go to the publicly funded at your local university "anti racist groups", who clearly call for genocide...

First, a primer:
Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid Of White People (And That’s A Good Thing)
(((Goldstein))), hates White people, WOW!

The article in question (regulated to shit tier news):
Ridiculous anti-white politics are threatening people of color in Seattle
Of course, the theme of this article is of course, "those poor minorities". Never mind the global minority known as White People!, they need to be breed out right? Read the article, no shit, this genocidal dipshit is arguing that white genocide is good! Only that she, or is it an it? I don't know with these gender confused types. The gender confused fecking shitbag is only concerned that the poor non whites who are breeding with whites, in order to genocide them, might be "offended". No shit, that is how oblivious they have become. And this has created division in their ranks. A weak point. They are not ready to declare open genocide just yet...
They are not capable, we are now dealing with the degenerate legacy of the 60's. They are weak.

The reality:
This is comment which is undergoing a thorough scrubbing by the people who wish to accelerate the genocide of white people:

"Racism and Whiteness are the same thing.
In order to end racism we must end whiteness.
That’s the only solution.
If you are white, do the right thing and have non-white children.

(Of course, this is the central theme of any university education, regardless of major. An open declaration of genocide.)

Also, make sure other whites who date whites are aware they are perpetuating racism.
When there are fewer whites in a couple of generations, the non-whites will surely be able to capitalise on the opportunity to end racism for good.
This is why us whites are better off not having white offspring.
This is the only way we can reduce our inherent racism to a forgivable level. We must end racism, not participate in it."

So, are you ready to declare that White people need to be breed of the planet? If you don't, then you are racist.

That is the question the universities are putting in front of us white people.



Also, do you really want to pay for your son or daughter to go to a university? I have a better option, just ask.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.

B - White Americans are subject to extreme propaganda at the hands of media conglomerates denigrating them on racial basis. Observe, every feckin sitcom, commercial, or any media published through mainstream means... mostly targeted at women and children.

C - White Americans are subject to obviously racist affirmative action laws.

D - White Americans are subject to an obscene amount of propaganda demanding miscegenation.

E - White Americans are subject to forcible education, or reeducation of their very own children to achieve what are obvious genocidal goals.

By every condition, White Americans are being subjected to genocide. The supporting evidence is the often celebrated demographic changes which are reported and "projected".
If the media celebrates a racial demographic change, are they not complicit in genocide?

So, now we go to the publicly funded at your local university "anti racist groups", who clearly call for genocide:

So, the article in question (regulated to shit tier news):
A primer:
Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid Of White People (And That’s A Good Thing)
(((Goldstein))), hates White people, WOW!

Current events:
Ridiculous anti-white politics are threatening people of color in Seattle
Of course, the theme of this article is of course, "those poor minorities", never mind the global minority known as White People!, they need to be breed out right? Read the article, no shit, this genocidal dipshit is arguing that white genocide is good! Only that she, or is it an it? I don't know with these gender confused types. The gender confused fecking shitbag is only concerned that the poor non whites who are breeding with whites,in order to genocide them, might be "offended". No shit, that is how oblivious they have become. And this has created division in their ranks. A weak point. They are not ready to declare open genocide just yet...

The reality, this is comment which is undergoing a thorough scrubbing by the people who wish to accelerate the genocide of white people:

"Racism and Whiteness are the same thing.
In order to end racism we must end whiteness.
That’s the only solution.
If you are white, do the right thing and have non-white children.

(Of course, this is the central theme of any university education, regardless of major. An open declaration of genocide.)

Also, make sure other whites who date whites are aware they are perpetuating racism.
When there are fewer whites in a couple of generations, the non-whites will surely be able to capitalise on the opportunity to end racism for good.
This is why us whites are better off not having white offspring.
This is the only way we can reduce our inherent racism to a forgivable level. We must end racism, not participate in it."

So, are you ready to declare that White people need to be breed of the planet? If you don't, then you are racist.

That is the question the universities are putting in front of us white people.



Also, do you really want to pay for your son or daughter to go to a university? I have a better option, just ask.

Looks like you need a safe space

 

[D Truth]

Safe space.
As a sure fire pussy, would you care to define what that is?
Yeppers! lets look into that! <insert random gay emoticon here>

 

[Tommy Tainant]

It cheapens the word "genocide" when it is misused like this.

 

[José]

Genocide does not necessarily have to be violent.

If you:

a - flood a white majority country like America with non-white immigration

b - bombard the american youth with the glamourization of mixed couples and black, latino popular culture in a clear effort to promote race mixing as a model to be followed by the american youth

you are clearly "committing acts with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial group", the UN definition of genocide.

What's been happenning in the United States since the end of WWII fits c and d perfectly:

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

 

[jwoodie]

Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.

A laughable comparison, especially since black-on-black crime is way out of proportion to black-on-white crime. Do you consider this self-genocide?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Genocide does not necessarily have to be violent.

If you:

a - flood a white majority country like America with non-white immigration

b - bombard the american youth with the glamourization of mixed couples and black, latino popular culture in a clear effort to promote race mixing as a model to be followed by the american youth

you are clearly "committing acts with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial group", the UN definition of genocide.

What's been happenning in the United States since the end of WWII fits c and d perfectly:

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

b - bombard the american youth with the glamourization of mixed couples and black, latino popular culture in a clear effort to promote race mixing as a model to be followed by the american youth

People tend to marry people who they are attracted to and have a chemistry with. That is natural. Your obvious distaste for this is puzzling and needs to be explained.

 

[José]

The percentage of interracial marriages in America was less than 1% in the fifties and it is 5,6% now and growing.

Human nature certainly didn't change in a few decades so the only possible explanation was the dramatic increase in the US non white population brought about by changes in the country's immigration laws coupled with the propaganda bombardment carried out by the US media portraying interracial couples in a glamourized way, as a model to be followed by young americans.

As you correctly said, people do tend to marry people who they are attracted with... this is indeed natural and happens in all societies.

What is not natural is a premeditated, calculated state policy to destroy the historic racial composition of a country to turn its majority group into a minority and subject their youth to a massive indoctrination by the educational system and mass media to promote its erradication or drastic reduction through race mixing.

What is really puzzling is your aparent inability to differentiate between "spontaneous" and societally induced race mixing, ie, the genocidal measures that white americans have been subjected to in the last 50 years.

The flooding of America with non-whites and the brainwashing of the american youth is not a "misuse" of the word genocide.

It is an acurate description of a different kind of genocide that uses miscigenation instead of gas chambers.

A genocide that despite being non-violent, shares the same morally depraved goal as the nazi one:

to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The percentage of interracial marriages in America was less than 1% in the fifties and it is 5,6% now and growing.

Human nature certainly didn't change in a few decades so the only possible explanation was the dramatic increase in the US non white population brought about by changes in the country's immigration laws coupled with the propaganda bombardment carried out by the US media portraying interracial couples in a glamourized way, as a model to be followed by young americans.

As you correctly said, people do tend to marry people who they are attracted with... this is indeed natural and happens in all societies.

What is not natural is a premeditated, calculated state policy to destroy the historic racial composition of a country to turn its majority group into a minority and subject their youth to a massive indoctrination by the educational system and mass media to promote its erradication or drastic reduction through race mixing.

What is really puzzling is your aparent inability to differentiate between "spontaneous" and societally induced race mixing, ie, the genocidal measures that white americans have been subjected to in the last 50 years.

The flooding of America with non-whites and the brainwashing of the american youth is not a "misuse" of the word genocide.

It is an acurate description of a different kind of genocide that uses miscigenation instead of gas chambers.

A genocide that despite being non-violent, shares the same morally depraved goal as the nazi one:

to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.

I still dont understand why mixed race marriages are an issue. This isnt the 50s.

 

[bt404]

Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.

B - White Americans are subject to extreme propaganda at the hands of media conglomerates denigrating them on racial basis. Observe, every feckin sitcom, commercial, or any media published through mainstream means... mostly targeted at women and children.

C - White Americans are subject to obviously racist affirmative action laws.

D - White Americans are subject to an obscene amount of propaganda demanding miscegenation.

E - White Americans are subject to forcible education, or reeducation of their very own children to achieve what are obvious genocidal goals.

By every condition, White Americans are being subjected to genocide. The supporting evidence is the often celebrated demographic changes which are reported and "projected".
If the media celebrates a racial demographic change, are they not complicit in genocide?

So, now we go to the publicly funded at your local university "anti racist groups", who clearly call for genocide...

First, a primer:
Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid Of White People (And That’s A Good Thing)
(((Goldstein))), hates White people, WOW!

The article in question (regulated to shit tier news):
Ridiculous anti-white politics are threatening people of color in Seattle
Of course, the theme of this article is of course, "those poor minorities". Never mind the global minority known as White People!, they need to be breed out right? Read the article, no shit, this genocidal dipshit is arguing that white genocide is good! Only that she, or is it an it? I don't know with these gender confused types. The gender confused fecking shitbag is only concerned that the poor non whites who are breeding with whites, in order to genocide them, might be "offended". No shit, that is how oblivious they have become. And this has created division in their ranks. A weak point. They are not ready to declare open genocide just yet...
They are not capable, we are now dealing with the degenerate legacy of the 60's. They are weak.

The reality:
This is comment which is undergoing a thorough scrubbing by the people who wish to accelerate the genocide of white people:

"Racism and Whiteness are the same thing.
In order to end racism we must end whiteness.
That’s the only solution.
If you are white, do the right thing and have non-white children.

(Of course, this is the central theme of any university education, regardless of major. An open declaration of genocide.)

Also, make sure other whites who date whites are aware they are perpetuating racism.
When there are fewer whites in a couple of generations, the non-whites will surely be able to capitalise on the opportunity to end racism for good.
This is why us whites are better off not having white offspring.
This is the only way we can reduce our inherent racism to a forgivable level. We must end racism, not participate in it."

So, are you ready to declare that White people need to be breed of the planet? If you don't, then you are racist.

That is the question the universities are putting in front of us white people.



Also, do you really want to pay for your son or daughter to go to a university? I have a better option, just ask.

I agree there's definitely a genocide. Except you got the victims wrong. The real victims of this horrific mass genocide are ignorant saps i.e those who've never have had the good fortune to befriend people who have different skin pigmentation than them (as well as different cultural backgrounds). The ignorant sap is an unfortunate creature for they are utterly incapable of seeing past somebody's external appearance as well as incapable of seeing past their own cultural lenses. We need to save the ignorant saps because without ignorant saps, the world would be a very boring place.

 

[FA_Q2]

You make several assertions but do not validate a single one of them:

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.
Is blatantly false. The majority of crime experienced by white people is at the hands of other white people. That is simply a fact just as the majority of black crime is actually against other blacks. It has to do with the higher violent crime in poorer neighborhoods and that those poorer neighborhoods tend to self segregate.

B - White Americans are subject to extreme propaganda at the hands of media conglomerates denigrating them on racial basis. Observe, every feckin sitcom, commercial, or any media published through mainstream means... mostly targeted at women and children.
Yes and no. There is clearly a political slant against the idea of white people in the promotion of multiculturalism (or the modern twist on it) but there is also the opposite out there and none of this is some massive coordinated effort to 'destroy' white people. You are basing this on nothing but fearmongering.

C - White Americans are subject to obviously racist affirmative action laws.
Ill give you that one. It has nothing to do with genocide though - it has to do with this asinine idea that equal outcomes must happen and that all cultures are equal. That is, on its face, utter garbage.

D - White Americans are subject to an obscene amount of propaganda demanding miscegenation.
No, they are not. This is another asinine assertion you simply put out there without anything supporting it. Interracial marriages and children are going to happen, end of story. What is more interesting to me is that you are doing exactly what you seem to be claiming others are - your post reeks of demonizing mixing races without any real cause.

E - White Americans are subject to forcible education, or reeducation of their very own children to achieve what are obvious genocidal goals.
...
And you cap it off with another even more loony assertion.


Considering that the whites still account for 70 percent of the nation it is rather asinine to demand that they are being subjected to genocide. You want to know why whites are falling in percentages from other races? It is not because or genocide (and that is blatantly obvious). It is not because

BTW, your Goldstein article has been removed because it is hate propaganda. Yes, such propaganda does exist but its mere existence does not indicate that the country is following it. The very fact it was removed from the location that you linked shows that such garbage is not tolerated. It is not as another poster suggested "flood[ing] a white majority country like America with non-white immigration." The reality is far simpler:

White culture does not promote having as many children as black or Mexican culture. That is it. Whites simply do not have as many children.
Explaining Why Minority Births Now Outnumber White Births

Hispanics, especially, tend to be catholic and value very large families. Whites, on the other hand, are shifting to value career more and more and a large family less and less.

 

[Toronado3800]

The percentage of interracial marriages in America was less than 1% in the fifties and it is 5,6% now and growing.

Human nature certainly didn't change in a few decades so the only possible explanation was the dramatic increase in the US non white population brought about by changes in the country's immigration laws coupled with the propaganda bombardment carried out by the US media portraying interracial couples in a glamourized way, as a model to be followed by young americans.

As you correctly said, people do tend to marry people who they are attracted with... this is indeed natural and happens in all societies.

What is not natural is a premeditated, calculated state policy to destroy the historic racial composition of a country to turn its majority group into a minority and subject their youth to a massive indoctrination by the educational system and mass media to promote its erradication or drastic reduction through race mixing.

What is really puzzling is your aparent inability to differentiate between "spontaneous" and societally induced race mixing, ie, the genocidal measures that white americans have been subjected to in the last 50 years.

The flooding of America with non-whites and the brainwashing of the american youth is not a "misuse" of the word genocide.

It is an acurate description of a different kind of genocide that uses miscigenation instead of gas chambers.

A genocide that despite being non-violent, shares the same morally depraved goal as the nazi one:

to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.

This place really needs "disagree with" and "sickened by" buttons.

 

[José]

Toronado is a multiracialist who doesn't even try to deny or at least hide the stench of his genocidal ambitions towards white americans anymore.

This is one of his "pearls" uttered a few years ago...

The line was so vile, so despicable that I couldn't forget it anymore even after 2 or 3 years:

"What I hope to see is a tremendous increase in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

The biggest, saddest irony of all is the fact that genocidal monsters who openly, shamelessly advocate the destruction of a country's non-supremacist racial composition and the elimination or drastic reduction of its main racial group are perceived by the general public as the "good guys", the guys who fight racism, discrimination...

After five decades of heavy multiracialist indoctrination that portrays an indescribable moral pervertion like the ongoing genocide of the white people of the United States as "an innevitable historic process", as the "most natural thing in the world", as "business as usual", I'm willing to bet most people perceives this crowd, guys who have the same agenda as Hitler minus the gas chambers, as "virtuous paladins" of future harmonious race relations, while people like D Truth, who are actually trying to prevent a monstrosity from being perpetrated, just like the brave germans that tried to murder Hitler, is villified as a "white supremacist", as a "throwback" to the bad old days of the KKK.

What kind of fecal matter one has to have inside their head, what kind of mindless drone one has to be to achieve the prowess of confusing an attempt to stop a genocide with "white supremacism"?

The world has really gone mad.

 

[yiostheoy]

Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

A - White Americans are subject to an non-equal violent victimization rate at the hands of non-white offenders.

B - White Americans are subject to extreme propaganda at the hands of media conglomerates denigrating them on racial basis. Observe, every feckin sitcom, commercial, or any media published through mainstream means... mostly targeted at women and children.

C - White Americans are subject to obviously racist affirmative action laws.

D - White Americans are subject to an obscene amount of propaganda demanding miscegenation.

E - White Americans are subject to forcible education, or reeducation of their very own children to achieve what are obvious genocidal goals.

By every condition, White Americans are being subjected to genocide. The supporting evidence is the often celebrated demographic changes which are reported and "projected".
If the media celebrates a racial demographic change, are they not complicit in genocide?

So, now we go to the publicly funded at your local university "anti racist groups", who clearly call for genocide...

First, a primer:
Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid Of White People (And That’s A Good Thing)
(((Goldstein))), hates White people, WOW!

The article in question (regulated to shit tier news):
Ridiculous anti-white politics are threatening people of color in Seattle
Of course, the theme of this article is of course, "those poor minorities". Never mind the global minority known as White People!, they need to be breed out right? Read the article, no shit, this genocidal dipshit is arguing that white genocide is good! Only that she, or is it an it? I don't know with these gender confused types. The gender confused fecking shitbag is only concerned that the poor non whites who are breeding with whites, in order to genocide them, might be "offended". No shit, that is how oblivious they have become. And this has created division in their ranks. A weak point. They are not ready to declare open genocide just yet...
They are not capable, we are now dealing with the degenerate legacy of the 60's. They are weak.

The reality:
This is comment which is undergoing a thorough scrubbing by the people who wish to accelerate the genocide of white people:

"Racism and Whiteness are the same thing.
In order to end racism we must end whiteness.
That’s the only solution.
If you are white, do the right thing and have non-white children.

(Of course, this is the central theme of any university education, regardless of major. An open declaration of genocide.)

Also, make sure other whites who date whites are aware they are perpetuating racism.
When there are fewer whites in a couple of generations, the non-whites will surely be able to capitalise on the opportunity to end racism for good.
This is why us whites are better off not having white offspring.
This is the only way we can reduce our inherent racism to a forgivable level. We must end racism, not participate in it."

So, are you ready to declare that White people need to be breed of the planet? If you don't, then you are racist.

That is the question the universities are putting in front of us white people.



Also, do you really want to pay for your son or daughter to go to a university? I have a better option, just ask.

Neo-Nazi cockroaches have been coming out of the woodwork lately.

Looks like the mod's nipped this one in the bud.

Good catch!

 

[yiostheoy]

Genocide does not necessarily have to be violent.

If you:

a - flood a white majority country like America with non-white immigration

b - bombard the american youth with the glamourization of mixed couples and black, latino popular culture in a clear effort to promote race mixing as a model to be followed by the american youth

you are clearly "committing acts with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial group", the UN definition of genocide.

What's been happenning in the United States since the end of WWII fits c and d perfectly:

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

Looks like this Neo-Nazi scurried through the net.

Spam bot.

Ignore list.

 

[yiostheoy]

I still dont understand why mixed race marriages are an issue. This isnt the 50s.

Mixed marriage is an offense to Nazi's and Neo-Nazi's.

So whenever one of them starts harping about it then you know you have got a Neo-Nazi by the toe.

 

[José]

Originally posted by yiostheoy
Looks like this Neo-Nazi scurried through the net.

Spam bot.

Ignore list.

Do you see what I mean by "the world has really gone mad"?

The mind of the individual brainwashed by multiracialism functions in a parallel universe where a complete inversion of reality occurs:

The people actually taking a stand against the genocide of white americans are automatically labelled "Nazis", "white supremacists"

and

those justifying, rationalizing genocide, the hallmark of Nazism, suddenly become the "good guys".

 

[FA_Q2]

The line was so vile, so despicable that I couldn't forget it anymore even after 2 or 3 years:

"What I hope to see is a tremendous increase in the number of sexual relations between whites, blacks and hispanics..."

So vile and despicable? People choosing to have sex with those that are not the same race are vile and despicable?

And you claim that you are not racist. It is clear that you are - seeing the mere the act of sexual relations between people of other races vile and despicable is exactly what racism is.

 

[bt404]

Originally posted by yiostheoy
Looks like this Neo-Nazi scurried through the net.

Spam bot.

Ignore list.

Do you see what I mean by "the world has really gone mad"?

The mind of the individual brainwashed by multiracialism functions in a parallel universe where a complete inversion of reality occurs:

The people actually taking a stand against the genocide of white americans are automatically labelled "Nazis", "white supremacists"

and

those justifying, rationalizing genocide, the hallmark of Nazism, suddenly become the "good guys".

I've never talked to an actual neo-nazi before. You seem like an excellent speciman.

So in your opinion, do you think that black people have different genes to white people? Do you think there is more than one type of human being?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Mixed marriage is an offense to Nazi's and Neo-Nazi's.
So whenever one of them starts harping about it then you know you have got a Neo-Nazi by the toe.

I am not a neoNazi and I dont think that inter-racial marriages should be illegal.

BUT, I do find it disturbing how often we see happy harmonious white female/black male inter-racial marriages and not nearly so often black female/white male relationships shown to us on TV shows and commercials. The most common inter-racial couples portrayed for white men is with Asian females and Asian men are hardly ever depicted with white women. And of course white men / white women marriages alays have something wrong with them. He is either an ass hole consumed by ambition or she is a nag who berates her husband day and night and insults him and humiliates him in public, or they are good at keeping a clean public image but are secretly no longer in love and just going through the motions, etc, fill in the trope. A peaceful, happy, loving relationship is most often portrayed in mixed relationships today; Father Knows Best is seen as a silly old piece of fantasy.

Why are these stereotypes pushed so hard by the mass media?

It would seem that they are subtly encouraging mixed race marriage and that dove tails with the declarations by many leftists that whiteness must be destroyed, open calls to white genocide by nonviolent means. Some leaders in the further left, like in Black Lives Matter, claim that white people need to have their property seized and then run out of the country as this continent wasnot meant for whites, they say.

So if whites get upset by this and posts about it and complain about it, your immediate response is that they are neoNazis and you put them on ignore?

Well, fine, if that is what you want to do, but you should be aware that these old attitudes you have are quite obsolete. The majority of white people concerned by these topics are not anywhere near some kind of Nazi at all. They just want to maintain their ethnicity as Nature gives them that instinct to do.

That instinct is pretty strong. I was raised to not place any restrictions on my personal associations, including race, and I found myself dating a very nice black woman while I was on an assignment in the Army. She was intelligent, very polite and the perfect Southern Bell type of person and she liked me, it seemed. Then I came to that moment when I had to decide if I wanted to pursue things further. To my surprise I realized I wanted to have white children that looked like the other people in my family. I dont particularly get along with my family so it was shocking to me that this feeling was so strong. But there it was. I wanted to have white children and she could never do that, so I kept the relationship at just friends, though I bet she might have very well had the same feelings too upon reflection.

Our media today seems to be doing its best to encourage white men to mate with Asian women and white women to mate with black men. Again, I dont see this as something criminal, unethical or immoral, I just wonder why it is. Then I read the liberals explaining why whiteness must die and it suddenly makes sense.

And that makes me a Nazi?

roflmao