Gay statists strike again...you will submit!!!!

A judge ruled that the GIfford private residence isn't so private after all.

Washington Times:

New York farm owners who rent their facilities for birthday parties and wedding ceremonies have been fined thousands of dollars for refusing to host a lesbian wedding.

Cynthia and Robert Gifford were fined $10,000 and ordered to pay $3,000 in restitution to the lesbian couple after they refused to hold the wedding at their Liberty Ridge Farm near Albany, Religion News Service reported.

When Jennifer McCarthy and Melisa Erwin asked the Giffords to use the facility for a 2012 wedding, Mrs. Gifford, a Christian, said she could only host their reception on the farm, but not the wedding. Weddings typically are conducted on the first floor of the Giffords’ home, and Mrs. Giffordargued the lesbian wedding would “literally hit too close to home,” RNS reported.

New York City Administrative Law Judge Migdalia Pares ruled that the Giffords’ farm, which is also their home, is a place of public accommodation and is therefore subject to New York’s anti-discrimination laws, RNS reported.“The fact that the Giffords also reside at Gifford Barn,” the decision says, “does not render it private.”

The couple must now pay $13,000 in fines and restitution. The Giffords’ lawyer, James Trainor, said they are considering whether to appeal or pursue further legal action, RNS reported.

This is outrageous. Just because there's an occasional weddiing ceremony performed in their house doesn't make it "public." This blurring of public/private lines by the judge is an insidious attack on privacy and personal liberty.

It's probably expensive, but the Giffords should keep fighting this ruling until the courts overrule this miscarraige of justice.

Just like the bakers and photographers...they could have gone somewhere else...but as long as there is one person who does not agree with their lifestyle on religious grounds...they will not stop...and they will punish them....like us or pay the consequences...
 
Again, its not about equality, its about forcing acceptance. The photographers and the bakers were the start, this is the next logical step.
 
So what? It's against the law in NY to discriminate against someone for their sexual orientation.
 
So much for gays not invading private homes.

The Christian couple should have looked ahead. Agreed to do the wedding then torch the room. Can't fulfill the contract because of fire. $13,000 would pay for a whole lot of repairs and they wouldn't have a stain on their conscience.
 
Freedom of religion is a right that supersedes any state law...but why quibble over inalienable rights when the ability to force people to do what we want because they don't like us is popular right now....
 
It was unquestionable that the premises normally rented out for receptions was rented to this lesbian couple. The couple wanted to invade the private home to have the wedding in their living room. Occasionally the family home has been used for weddings. This should not make it a public space any more than my giving dinner parties makes my dining room a restaurant.
 
So what? It's against the law in NY to discriminate against someone for their sexual orientation.

The law is unconstitutional. If it isn't, then free association is evidently unconstitutional. The definition of a public accommodation has been stretched beyond meaning and intent. By this definition Churches should be punished as well, same as synagogues and temples.
 
When you rent out your living room for wedding receptions and parties, your living room is no longer a "private home". The selling of that space makes it closer to a restaurant, inn, or meeting hall.


>>>>

Sieg Heil, Mein Herr.
 
It was unquestionable that the premises normally rented out for receptions was rented to this lesbian couple. The couple wanted to invade the private home to have the wedding in their living room. Occasionally the family home has been used for weddings. This should not make it a public space any more than my giving dinner parties makes my dining room a restaurant.


Giving a dinner party in your living room doesn't make it a place of Public Accommodation.


Operating a business out of your living room, kitchen, and dinning room by advertizing and using it as part of your business does make it more akin to a restaurant. If they don't want to rent their living spaces, they are under no obligation to do so. However IF THEY CHOOSE to do so, then it fell under New Yorks Public Accommodation law since they were using it for business purposes.

Don't want it to fall under the law? Not a problem, don't make it part of the business.


>>>>
 
Giving a dinner party in your living room doesn't make it a place of Public Accommodation.


Operating a business out of your living room, kitchen, and dinning room by advertizing and using it as part of your business does make it more akin to a restaurant. If they don't want to rent their living spaces, they are under no obligation to do so. However IF THEY CHOOSE to do so, then it fell under New Yorks Public Accommodation law since they were using it for business purposes.

Don't want it to fall under the law? Not a problem, don't make it part of the business.


>>>>

So acquiesce or go out of business. I can hear the Horst Wessel playing in your ears.....
 
So acquiesce or go out of business. I can hear the Horst Wessel playing in your ears.....


Who said anything about going out of business? If you don't want to rent your home, don't include it in the business model. The could remodel the inside of a barn for reception, they could limit events to outside only and errect tents if weather will be bad.

No one said they would be "put out of business".



>>>>
 
Godwin's Law
A term that originated on Usenet, Godwin's Law states that as an online argument grows longer and more heated, it becomes increasingly likely that somebody will bring up Adolf Hitler or the Nazis. When such an event occurs, the person guilty of invoking Godwin's Law has effectively forfieted the argument.\

Urban Dictionary: Godwin's Law


>>>>

Its not a faux pas when you do it intentionally.

And you have to admit, using a Horst Wessel reference is above and beyond your normal nazi reference.
 

Forum List

Back
Top