Gay Dallas Judge Won't Perform Straight Marriages

[Kiki Cannoli]

Ahh, but the judge (SHE) is not required to perform these duties and therefore is NOT negligent.

 

[The Rabbi]

SHe should not have to perform these services. Neither should any minister have to provide said services to gays if it is not to their liking.

no minister, priest or rabbi does if it isn't to their liking.

None of them work for the state and get a taxpayer-funded check, bubbe.

 

[del]

Funny how the left applauds him for his beliefs but condemns the catholic church on theirs and the birth control issue

funny how you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

 

[g5000]

Sounds like forcing to him to perform these duties compromises his values, good for him for staying true to his personal belief system.

He could always resign if his job interferes with his beliefs. Rather than pontificating from the bench.

There is no "marriage inequality" here. Everyone has an equal right to marry.

Can they all collect the cash and prizes doled out by state and federal governments that come with their marriage?

No.

Ergo, inequality.

 

[Avatar4321]

He can easily go through the ceramony for himself. He can marry any woman of his choice that is:

1) Unmarried
2) Above the age of consent
3) Not closely related to him.

Absolutely nothing but his own choices is stopping him.

and he's a she.

can any of you people read?

Yes. I was going off what the previous posters stated. I suppose i should have given them less credence in that regard.

Doesn't change the fact that she has every opportunity to marry that everyone else does. Just because she makes choices that prevent her from marrying doesn't mean she can't marry.

 

[gallantwarrior]

Hypocrisy rears it's ugly head once again. So, here's a judge who will not discharge his duties because they are at odds with his personal convictions. But, how dare a pharmacist refuse to issue drugs which result in consequences counter his personal belief.
Same solution, though. If the judge won't marry you, there are others who can, and will. If the pharmacist won't dispense the drug you seek, find another pharmacy. How easy is that?
Alas, according to the rules of libtard hypocrisy, the pharmacist WILL provide the demanded remedies, regardless of personal belief while the judge is celebrated as some kind of hero.

 

[del]

SHe should not have to perform these services. Neither should any minister have to provide said services to gays if it is not to their liking.

no minister, priest or rabbi does if it isn't to their liking.

None of them work for the state and get a taxpayer-funded check, bubbe.

thanks, rabbi obvious.

any other stupid comments you'd care to trot out?

 

[Si modo]

That's cool. It's not one of her duties, so obviously she does it voluntarily, as such, she can volunteer when she wants and when she doesn't want.

 

[Warrior102]

Damn - she looks as manly as Bo-DIKE-a. They should just just strap one on and proclaim themselves men once and for all. Put on a wife-beater, pop open a beer and mow the lawn. Boycott shaving too(if that hasn't been done yet).

 

[del]

Hypocrisy rears it's ugly head once again. So, here's a judge who will not discharge his duties because they are at odds with his personal convictions. But, how dare a pharmacist refuse to issue drugs which result in consequences counter his personal belief.
Same solution, though. If the judge won't marry you, there are others who can, and will. If the pharmacist won't dispense the drug you seek, find another pharmacy. How easy is that?
Alas, according to the rules of libtard hypocrisy, the pharmacist WILL provide the demanded remedies, regardless of personal belief while the judge is celebrated as some kind of hero.

stay stupid

and he's a she

 

[Avatar4321]

He could always resign if his job interferes with his beliefs. Rather than pontificating from the bench.

There is no "marriage inequality" here. Everyone has an equal right to marry.

marriage is not a right.

I think Loving v VA said it was. At least that's what the fags trot out all the time. If it is, it must be one of the rights "reserved to the states." If MA wants to vote on and pass fag "marriage" fine. But the people of CA have rejected it in at least 2 referenda.

You would be correct.

Marriage is a right according to the case law. Not this perversion of the definition of marriage.

 

[The Rabbi]

Sounds like forcing to him to perform these duties compromises his values, good for him for staying true to his personal belief system.

He could always resign if his job interferes with his beliefs. Rather than pontificating from the bench.

There is no "marriage inequality" here. Everyone has an equal right to marry.

Can they all collect the cash and prizes doled out by state and federal governments that come with their marriage?

No.

Ergo, inequality.

Yes they can. Who says they can't?

 

[del]

Damn - she looks as manly as Bo-DIKE-a. They should just just strap one on and proclaim themselves men once and for all. Put on a wife-beater, pop open a beer and mow the lawn. Boycott shaving too(if that hasn't been done yet).

we've already got plenty o' retard in this thread, but thanks for pitching in and doing more than your fair share.

 

[g5000]

He could always resign if his job interferes with his beliefs. Rather than pontificating from the bench.

There is no "marriage inequality" here. Everyone has an equal right to marry.

marriage is not a right.

of course it isn't

But equal protection under the law is a right.

Do all married people get the same cash and prizes doled out by state and federal governments for being married?

No.

Ergo, unequal protection under the law.

 

[Kiki Cannoli]

whats good for the catholic goose, is good for the gay gander!

 

[The Rabbi]

no minister, priest or rabbi does if it isn't to their liking.

None of them work for the state and get a taxpayer-funded check, bubbe.

thanks, rabbi obvious.

any other stupid comments you'd care to trot out?

No. You seem to have the stupid comments taken care of just fine.

 

[g5000]

He could always resign if his job interferes with his beliefs. Rather than pontificating from the bench.

There is no "marriage inequality" here. Everyone has an equal right to marry.

Can they all collect the cash and prizes doled out by state and federal governments that come with their marriage?

No.

Ergo, inequality.

Yes they can. Who says they can't?

See my signature.

 

[WillowTree]

Funny how the left applauds him for his beliefs but condemns the catholic church on theirs and the birth control issue

it's a her...her..

 

[gallantwarrior]

Hypocrisy rears it's ugly head once again. So, here's a judge who will not discharge his duties because they are at odds with his personal convictions. But, how dare a pharmacist refuse to issue drugs which result in consequences counter his personal belief.
Same solution, though. If the judge won't marry you, there are others who can, and will. If the pharmacist won't dispense the drug you seek, find another pharmacy. How easy is that?
Alas, according to the rules of libtard hypocrisy, the pharmacist WILL provide the demanded remedies, regardless of personal belief while the judge is celebrated as some kind of hero.

stay stupid

and he's a she

Whatever, she's a she...couldn't really tell without looking a second time. Regardless, gravy for the goose is gravy for the gander.

 

[Immanuel]

That's cool. It's not one of her duties, so obviously she does it voluntarily, as such, she can volunteer when she wants and when she doesn't want.

And if it was one of her duties and she refused to perform said duties then it would be the right of her employers, in this case the people of the county I believe, to determine whether or not she would remain employed.

In the meantime a straight couple can go find another judge to perform the services.

Immie