2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,965
- 52,236
- 2,290
Here we go.....a comparison between the response to the Garland, Texas terrorist attack and the Paris, France terrorist attack...in both cases the terrorists easily acquired guns even though in both cases on or more of each member of the team of terrorists was either known to the government or actually on a government terrorist watch list.....
And again, they both acquired guns......even the ones in strict gun control France...
The actual difference between the 2 attacks.....armed good guys on the scene immediately in Texas ( I love that state...they may save us yet) and disarmed good guys in France.....
Guns The Difference Between Garland And Paris
When armed terrorists attacked Charlie Hebdo headquarters over Muhammad cartoons on January 7, unarmed police officers were forced to flee for their lives. When armed men attacked people gathered in Garland, Texas, on May 3 over Prophet Muhammad cartoons, armed police cut them down — and the Daily Mail reported that the body of one was left lying the street while police searched for explosives.
The difference between Garland and Paris can be summed up in one word: guns.
On January 7, CBS News relayed reports from Britain’s Telegraph newspaper that the first two officers to arrive “were apparently unarmed” and “fled after seeing gunmen armed with automatic weapons and possibly a grenade launcher.” The UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.”
BBC reported the Paris gunmen killed 12 in their attack on Charlie Hebdo headquarters; that number includes 8 Charlie Hebdo “eight journalists, two police officers, a caretaker and a visitor.”
Moreover, the terrorists were able to continue their attack at different points in and around the city for the next 48 hours.
And again, they both acquired guns......even the ones in strict gun control France...
The actual difference between the 2 attacks.....armed good guys on the scene immediately in Texas ( I love that state...they may save us yet) and disarmed good guys in France.....
Guns The Difference Between Garland And Paris
When armed terrorists attacked Charlie Hebdo headquarters over Muhammad cartoons on January 7, unarmed police officers were forced to flee for their lives. When armed men attacked people gathered in Garland, Texas, on May 3 over Prophet Muhammad cartoons, armed police cut them down — and the Daily Mail reported that the body of one was left lying the street while police searched for explosives.
The difference between Garland and Paris can be summed up in one word: guns.
On January 7, CBS News relayed reports from Britain’s Telegraph newspaper that the first two officers to arrive “were apparently unarmed” and “fled after seeing gunmen armed with automatic weapons and possibly a grenade launcher.” The UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.”
BBC reported the Paris gunmen killed 12 in their attack on Charlie Hebdo headquarters; that number includes 8 Charlie Hebdo “eight journalists, two police officers, a caretaker and a visitor.”
Moreover, the terrorists were able to continue their attack at different points in and around the city for the next 48 hours.
