Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I blame the Senators from states that build military weapons and the brass that wants a 7 figure salaries when they retire.
The disadvantage noted is absolutely true. You just were way too furious to read the entire article, where it is explained.The "disadvantage" noted is complete crap.
Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job."A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."
Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.
Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job."A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."
Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.
Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job."A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."
Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.
The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.
I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.
Part of the F-15 record shows that:Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job."A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."
Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.
The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.
I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.
The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.Part of the F-15 record shows that:Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job."A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."
Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.
The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.
I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.
One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill
Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.
Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.
The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.Part of the F-15 record shows that:Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job."A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."
Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.
The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.
I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.
One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill
Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.
Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.
Russia was second lagerst arms exporter before 2015. The involvement in Syria increased the interest for Russian arms.The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.Part of the F-15 record shows that:Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.
The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.
I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.
One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill
Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.
Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.
Most elected to sit on the ground and be destroyed or fly to Syria or Iran. You can't stand it that not one F-15 has ever been lost in combat. You can even blow one wing completely off and it gets home just fine (with tanker support)
Get over it. The Mig-29 is listed as not wanted by anyone anymore. And even the Mig-35 just isn't selling either. It's become a joke of the fighter skies.
Russia was second lagerst arms exporter before 2015. The involvement in Syria increased the interest for Russian arms.The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.Part of the F-15 record shows that:Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.
I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.
One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill
Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.
Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.
Most elected to sit on the ground and be destroyed or fly to Syria or Iran. You can't stand it that not one F-15 has ever been lost in combat. You can even blow one wing completely off and it gets home just fine (with tanker support)
Get over it. The Mig-29 is listed as not wanted by anyone anymore. And even the Mig-35 just isn't selling either. It's become a joke of the fighter skies.
The Syria War Is Showcasing Russian Arms, Promoting Sales
You have totally ignored my points, by the way. F-15 is bombing Palestinian civilians, what losses do you expect?
Can´t afford or already have.Your cite shows that some countries are interested in support equipment like their radar sites and such. Not much interest in their Aircraft.
They are totally valid. Those airforces don´t have the trillions...As for your points, since you just make crap up, I ignore it.
Ask them, not me. Here you go:Besides, it's the F-16s that do the bombing. If they don't like it, stop lobbing in those missiles into Israel. Pretty simple solution.
