GAME. OVER.’: Jim Jordan ends the quid pro quo narrative in just one minute and forty-five seconds

Jordan was owned, after his holy roller routine on needing the whistleblower, as a witness, to question him, the person who started this.....

And the Dems response was, yes we'd welcome the President to sit in that witness chair, under oath...

gave a good laugh....in the audience.

When/if this reaches the Senate, the Democrats are going to wish they had never gone this route. Just imagine the Democrats that arre going to be called to testify under oath. They will be exposed, much like the Obama minions in the FBI were exposed, as being nothing but partisan hacks. The Democrats only hope to save face is that the MSM and social media does everything within their power to keep all damning information under wraps, which they likely will. If just 1/4 of Democrats with a brain would look for news at other media sources, the Democratic Party would never win another election. Sadly, most don't. They are spoon fed and led to slaughter by the MSM.
I have zero worries about that, if it makes it to a trial!!!

-----------

There's been nothing pegged illegal in the FBI investigation, as of yet.... gotta prove that first, with evidence to charge, then trial to find guilty
 
Jordan was owned, after his holy roller routine on needing the whistleblower, as a witness, to question him, the person who started this.....

And the Dems response was, yes we'd welcome the President to sit in that witness chair, under oath...

gave a good laugh....in the audience.

When/if this reaches the Senate, the Democrats are going to wish they had never gone this route. Just imagine the Democrats that arre going to be called to testify under oath. They will be exposed, much like the Obama minions in the FBI were exposed, as being nothing but partisan hacks. The Democrats only hope to save face is that the MSM and social media does everything within their power to keep all damning information under wraps, which they likely will. If just 1/4 of Democrats with a brain would look for news at other media sources, the Democratic Party would never win another election. Sadly, most don't. They are spoon fed and led to slaughter by the MSM.
I have zero worries about that, if it makes it to a trial!!!

-----------

There's been nothing pegged illegal in the FBI investigation, as of yet.... gotta prove that first, with evidence to charge, then trial to find guilty
Aunt Nancy has touted herself as a MASTER LEGISLATOR, and if she actually was and had half a brain, she'd pull the plug on this FARCE before any more damage can be done, and to guard against it ever going to the senate. Because if it DOES hit the senate, it's going to be a BLOOD BATH. THEN the dems are on the REPUBLICANS turf, and have to play by the REPUBLICANS rules, and if they play as DIRTY as ScHITt is playing, they're going to get SLAUGHTERED. But, I guess when you suffer from TERMINAL TDS, you just can't SEE that far in advance. Your BRAIN is all FOGGED OVER with HATE.
 
Hard to have first hand witnesses when they are being blocked by the guy under impeachment inquiry...

:rolleyes:


And then the SURPRISE occurred!!!

Amb Taylor was told by one of his staff that he was at dinner with Amb Sondland who had a call with the President, the staffer heard the President asking sondland about the "investigations" in to the Biden's.

That is first hand connection to the President... No one can say the President didn't know what Sondland and Giuliani were doing, or they alone cooked this up.

Yeah, funny how Sondland's memory was refreshed just recently.$$$ It shouldn't matter anyway. Even if there was a Quid Pro Quo, it would have been justified because it is the Presidents duty to do what is in the best interest of the US. You Democrats were all over the Russian interference probe, but let Trump ask Zelensky to look into possible corruption by his government and former vice President Biden and you all blow a gasket. Obviously, Democrats have zero problem with having a vice-President directly tell the Ukrainian president that we will be withholding aide unless you do what we ask which just happens to benefit said vice-Presidents son. At least be consistent.

This would be a non-story if it weren't for never Trumpers in the deep state who continue to do anything to get rid of Trump, the outsider. The corruption in Washington was amped up under Obama. It is difficult to weed out all the bad actors.
 
Jordan was owned, after his holy roller routine on needing the whistleblower, as a witness, to question him, the person who started this.....

And the Dems response was, yes we'd welcome the President to sit in that witness chair, under oath...

gave a good laugh....in the audience.

When/if this reaches the Senate, the Democrats are going to wish they had never gone this route. Just imagine the Democrats that arre going to be called to testify under oath. They will be exposed, much like the Obama minions in the FBI were exposed, as being nothing but partisan hacks. The Democrats only hope to save face is that the MSM and social media does everything within their power to keep all damning information under wraps, which they likely will. If just 1/4 of Democrats with a brain would look for news at other media sources, the Democratic Party would never win another election. Sadly, most don't. They are spoon fed and led to slaughter by the MSM.
I have zero worries about that, if it makes it to a trial!!!

-----------

There's been nothing pegged illegal in the FBI investigation, as of yet.... gotta prove that first, with evidence to charge, then trial to find guilty

Do you recall the daming texts from Strzok and Page? Forget trials and whether they did anything illegal or not. Anyone could read their texts and see that him being the lead investigator was an absolute joke. He clearly was far, far too partisan to be leading any investigations. Democrats gloss it over llke it meant nothing. I refuse to believe that normal people have their heads that deep in the sand.
 
Trump isn't going anywhere until January 2025. Ken Starr said that there is no crime, let alone an impeachable crime. Plus the women are all mad at the democrats for having their soaps all preempted by the boring Schiff hearing. My wife was boiling mad, that damn hearing was on every channel!! Hell hath no fury...
 
Hard to have first hand witnesses when they are being blocked by the guy under impeachment inquiry...

:rolleyes:


And then the SURPRISE occurred!!!

Amb Taylor was told by one of his staff that he was at dinner with Amb Sondland who had a call with the President, the staffer heard the President asking sondland about the "investigations" in to the Biden's.

That is first hand connection to the President... No one can say the President didn't know what Sondland and Giuliani were doing, or they alone cooked this up.

It's not first hand until the staffer testifies. To date, Taylor hasn't presented any first hand information.
 
“GAME. OVER.”

Watch this short clip of Rep. Jim Jordan questioning Dem star witness Amb. Taylor and getting him to admit that in his three meetings with Ukrainian President Zelensky, a quid pro quo of investigating the Bidens in exchange for releasing military aid never came up. It’s A-MA-ZING:

Twitchy ^ | 1:56 pm on November 13, 2019
That was epic!
 
“GAME. OVER.”

Watch this short clip of Rep. Jim Jordan questioning Dem star witness Amb. Taylor and getting him to admit that in his three meetings with Ukrainian President Zelensky, a quid pro quo of investigating the Bidens in exchange for releasing military aid never came up. It’s A-MA-ZING:

Twitchy ^ | 1:56 pm on November 13, 2019
If you look at the lefty replies to your opening post, you can see that none of the lefties here are able to answer Jordan's question either. The lefties on this thread are only making Jordan's case stronger.
 
“GAME. OVER.”

Watch this short clip of Rep. Jim Jordan questioning Dem star witness Amb. Taylor and getting him to admit that in his three meetings with Ukrainian President Zelensky, a quid pro quo of investigating the Bidens in exchange for releasing military aid never came up. It’s A-MA-ZING:

Twitchy ^ | 1:56 pm on November 13, 2019
I'm sure you want to believe that, but it doesn't change anything.
 
"a liar can accuse someone of being a liar. a thief can accuse someone of being a thief" - Sassy Scott Adams talking about Pencil Neck Schiff
 

Forum List

Back
Top