Game of Thrones depicts what happens when the Patriarchy doesn't rein in radical feminsim.

RandomPoster

Platinum Member
May 22, 2017
2,584
1,792
970
The series starts with Robert Baratheon serving as King. He delegates running the kingdom to people smarter than him while he gets drunk and has sex with prostitutes. The kingdom prospers and, for the most part, people live their lives in peace. He gets murdered by his conniving wife to cover up the fact that all of their children were fathered by her twin brother. She, along with her brat son, starts a war that splits the kingdom in two. Cersei's calm, rational father, Tywin Lannister, has to take control and restore what semblance of sanity to the kingdom that he can. On the other side of the ocean, Daenerys Targaryen aspires to become queen of the world by destroying the world and rebuilding it in the image of her feminist fantasies. At no point does she prove to be a brilliant military tactician. She simply impulsively incinerates her enemies with her dragons and the massive army that worships her and follows her around drooling at her heels.

Neither Jamie Lannister nor Jon Snow do anything to rein things in and possibly work towards a reasonable solution, instead following their women around endlessly professing their unconditional love, loyalty, and subservience. Eventually, the two women continue to escalate the situation until King's Landing, along with almost all of its inhabitants, is burned to the ground and the kingdom is in ruins. Not being satisfied with all the death and destruction her hysterical rage has caused so far, Daenerys Targaryen makes plans to destroy every land she has ever heard of. Jon Snow finally can't take any more of the insanity and kills her. If he had kept her in check from the beginning, hundreds of thousands of people would not have died, the kingdom would be far more prosperous, and he could have married her instead of killing her.
 
And it's all ran now by the little fag that was tit fed up until he was 18.
 
The series starts with Robert Baratheon serving as King. He delegates running the kingdom to people smarter than him while he gets drunk and has sex with prostitutes. The kingdom prospers and, for the most part, people live their lives in peace. He gets murdered by his conniving wife to cover up the fact that all of their children were fathered by her twin brother. She, along with her brat son, starts a war that splits the kingdom in two. Cersei's calm, rational father, Tywin Lannister, has to take control and restore what semblance of sanity to the kingdom that he can. On the other side of the ocean, Daenerys Targaryen aspires to become queen of the world by destroying the world and rebuilding it in the image of her feminist fantasies. At no point does she prove to be a brilliant military tactician. She simply impulsively incinerates her enemies with her dragons and the massive army that worships her and follows her around drooling at her heels.

Neither Jamie Lannister nor Jon Snow do anything to rein things in and possibly work towards a reasonable solution, instead following their women around endlessly professing their unconditional love, loyalty, and subservience. Eventually, the two women continue to escalate the situation until King's Landing, along with almost all of its inhabitants, is burned to the ground and the kingdom is in ruins. Not being satisfied with all the death and destruction her hysterical rage has caused so far, Daenerys Targaryen makes plans to destroy every land she has ever heard of. Jon Snow finally can't take any more of the insanity and kills her. If he had kept her in check from the beginning, hundreds of thousands of people would not have died, the kingdom would be far more prosperous, and he could have married her instead of killing her.

In both cases RandomPoster with either feminism/matriarchy and patriarchy,
there is either corrupt abuse of power to suppress the rights of individuals,
or there is a PROTECTORATE and INCLUSIVE approach to DEFEND the
rights of all people collectively.

Both can be abused.
Both can act as PROTECTORATES and INCLUDE the rights
and representation of all people.

To say only feminism gets radicalized
or to say only the patriarchal/hierarchical systems get abused
is missing the key point.

For example, if you look at today's Chinese Govt
you cannot blame that oppression on
* feminism
* religion
* free market capitalism

GREED FOR POWER happens in ANY COLLECTIVE organization
where the resources and power for the many
get concentrated in the hands of the few that become
UNEQUAL compared with the individuals at the grassroots
level without equal access to representation as the higher echelons.

This is INDEPENDENT of matriarchal/patriarchal approaches.

The check and balance is between the multitude of people
participating directly in the democratic process to hold
those in charge accountable.

That has to happen in ANY type of group, whether
religious or political, lead by men or women, or
whether nonprofit or business, or educational.

Even media gets corrupted if it's not kept in check by the people using it.

This is due to human nature as socially influencing each other
in COLLECTIVE GROUPS. Because we tend to organize in larger
groups according to IDENTITIES, then we can get more done in
TRIBES of common purpose and language, but we can also get
in larger level CONFLICTS BETWEEN tribes competing for dominance.

We are always going to have to watch out for corruption,
abuse and oppression with larger COLLECTIVE institutions
that have greater resources and influence than individuals.

That's true of anyone and any group.

The politics shown in Game of Thrones is the difference
between uniting vs. dividing and conquering. As long
as humanity is divided against itself, there is room for
manipulation and failure due to greed and unfair competition.
When you work toward COOPERATIVE economics and politics,
that is more SUSTAINABLE. Both men and women are capable
of leading in that direction, and both men and women are
prone to corruption and abuse due to power imbalances.
 
Never seen the show, but hear people talking about it sometimes. Art immitating life eh ?? Will have to check it out for the parrallels I guess.
 
The series starts with Robert Baratheon serving as King. He delegates running the kingdom to people smarter than him while he gets drunk and has sex with prostitutes. The kingdom prospers and, for the most part, people live their lives in peace. He gets murdered by his conniving wife to cover up the fact that all of their children were fathered by her twin brother. She, along with her brat son, starts a war that splits the kingdom in two. Cersei's calm, rational father, Tywin Lannister, has to take control and restore what semblance of sanity to the kingdom that he can. On the other side of the ocean, Daenerys Targaryen aspires to become queen of the world by destroying the world and rebuilding it in the image of her feminist fantasies. At no point does she prove to be a brilliant military tactician. She simply impulsively incinerates her enemies with her dragons and the massive army that worships her and follows her around drooling at her heels.

Neither Jamie Lannister nor Jon Snow do anything to rein things in and possibly work towards a reasonable solution, instead following their women around endlessly professing their unconditional love, loyalty, and subservience. Eventually, the two women continue to escalate the situation until King's Landing, along with almost all of its inhabitants, is burned to the ground and the kingdom is in ruins. Not being satisfied with all the death and destruction her hysterical rage has caused so far, Daenerys Targaryen makes plans to destroy every land she has ever heard of. Jon Snow finally can't take any more of the insanity and kills her. If he had kept her in check from the beginning, hundreds of thousands of people would not have died, the kingdom would be far more prosperous, and he could have married her instead of killing her.

In both cases RandomPoster with either feminism/matriarchy and patriarchy,
there is either corrupt abuse of power to suppress the rights of individuals,
or there is a PROTECTORATE and INCLUSIVE approach to DEFEND the
rights of all people collectively.

Both can be abused.
Both can act as PROTECTORATES and INCLUDE the rights
and representation of all people.

To say only feminism gets radicalized
or to say only the patriarchal/hierarchical systems get abused
is missing the key point.

For example, if you look at today's Chinese Govt
you cannot blame that oppression on
* feminism
* religion
* free market capitalism

GREED FOR POWER happens in ANY COLLECTIVE organization
where the resources and power for the many
get concentrated in the hands of the few that become
UNEQUAL compared with the individuals at the grassroots
level without equal access to representation as the higher echelons.

This is INDEPENDENT of matriarchal/patriarchal approaches.

The check and balance is between the multitude of people
participating directly in the democratic process to hold
those in charge accountable.

That has to happen in ANY type of group, whether
religious or political, lead by men or women, or
whether nonprofit or business, or educational.

Even media gets corrupted if it's not kept in check by the people using it.

This is due to human nature as socially influencing each other
in COLLECTIVE GROUPS. Because we tend to organize in larger
groups according to IDENTITIES, then we can get more done in
TRIBES of common purpose and language, but we can also get
in larger level CONFLICTS BETWEEN tribes competing for dominance.

We are always going to have to watch out for corruption,
abuse and oppression with larger COLLECTIVE institutions
that have greater resources and influence than individuals.

That's true of anyone and any group.

The politics shown in Game of Thrones is the difference
between uniting vs. dividing and conquering. As long
as humanity is divided against itself, there is room for
manipulation and failure due to greed and unfair competition.
When you work toward COOPERATIVE economics and politics,
that is more SUSTAINABLE. Both men and women are capable
of leading in that direction, and both men and women are
prone to corruption and abuse due to power imbalances.
That's why resisting the Lord and his teachings is a foolish game that is playing out all over the place these day's, and look where it gets us in the end.

The proof is there, but it is ignored on behalf of sin being chosen over righteousness, and how crazy is that ? Even a child knows that if a hand is burned by the stove eye, then does the child go and put the hand to the eye again ?? These days the answer is yep as if they didn't believe that their hand was burned before, but this is because somehow there has now been a huge mental health crisis formed in this country. It's amazing what people have been led to believe anymore.
 
Last edited:
The series starts with Robert Baratheon serving as King. He delegates running the kingdom to people smarter than him while he gets drunk and has sex with prostitutes. The kingdom prospers and, for the most part, people live their lives in peace. He gets murdered by his conniving wife to cover up the fact that all of their children were fathered by her twin brother. She, along with her brat son, starts a war that splits the kingdom in two. Cersei's calm, rational father, Tywin Lannister, has to take control and restore what semblance of sanity to the kingdom that he can. On the other side of the ocean, Daenerys Targaryen aspires to become queen of the world by destroying the world and rebuilding it in the image of her feminist fantasies. At no point does she prove to be a brilliant military tactician. She simply impulsively incinerates her enemies with her dragons and the massive army that worships her and follows her around drooling at her heels.

Neither Jamie Lannister nor Jon Snow do anything to rein things in and possibly work towards a reasonable solution, instead following their women around endlessly professing their unconditional love, loyalty, and subservience. Eventually, the two women continue to escalate the situation until King's Landing, along with almost all of its inhabitants, is burned to the ground and the kingdom is in ruins. Not being satisfied with all the death and destruction her hysterical rage has caused so far, Daenerys Targaryen makes plans to destroy every land she has ever heard of. Jon Snow finally can't take any more of the insanity and kills her. If he had kept her in check from the beginning, hundreds of thousands of people would not have died, the kingdom would be far more prosperous, and he could have married her instead of killing her.
shes a little like trump?
 
Never seen the show, but hear people talking about it sometimes. Art immitating life eh ?? Will have to check it out for the parrallels I guess.
do it great show very entertaining But a really great show is designated survivor on Net Flex 3 seasons
 
The series starts with Robert Baratheon serving as King. He delegates running the kingdom to people smarter than him while he gets drunk and has sex with prostitutes. The kingdom prospers and, for the most part, people live their lives in peace. He gets murdered by his conniving wife to cover up the fact that all of their children were fathered by her twin brother. She, along with her brat son, starts a war that splits the kingdom in two. Cersei's calm, rational father, Tywin Lannister, has to take control and restore what semblance of sanity to the kingdom that he can. On the other side of the ocean, Daenerys Targaryen aspires to become queen of the world by destroying the world and rebuilding it in the image of her feminist fantasies. At no point does she prove to be a brilliant military tactician. She simply impulsively incinerates her enemies with her dragons and the massive army that worships her and follows her around drooling at her heels.

Neither Jamie Lannister nor Jon Snow do anything to rein things in and possibly work towards a reasonable solution, instead following their women around endlessly professing their unconditional love, loyalty, and subservience. Eventually, the two women continue to escalate the situation until King's Landing, along with almost all of its inhabitants, is burned to the ground and the kingdom is in ruins. Not being satisfied with all the death and destruction her hysterical rage has caused so far, Daenerys Targaryen makes plans to destroy every land she has ever heard of. Jon Snow finally can't take any more of the insanity and kills her. If he had kept her in check from the beginning, hundreds of thousands of people would not have died, the kingdom would be far more prosperous, and he could have married her instead of killing her.
shes a little like trump?
Only when starts killing all you lying filth.
 
The series starts with Robert Baratheon serving as King. He delegates running the kingdom to people smarter than him while he gets drunk and has sex with prostitutes. The kingdom prospers and, for the most part, people live their lives in peace. He gets murdered by his conniving wife to cover up the fact that all of their children were fathered by her twin brother. She, along with her brat son, starts a war that splits the kingdom in two. Cersei's calm, rational father, Tywin Lannister, has to take control and restore what semblance of sanity to the kingdom that he can. On the other side of the ocean, Daenerys Targaryen aspires to become queen of the world by destroying the world and rebuilding it in the image of her feminist fantasies. At no point does she prove to be a brilliant military tactician. She simply impulsively incinerates her enemies with her dragons and the massive army that worships her and follows her around drooling at her heels.

Neither Jamie Lannister nor Jon Snow do anything to rein things in and possibly work towards a reasonable solution, instead following their women around endlessly professing their unconditional love, loyalty, and subservience. Eventually, the two women continue to escalate the situation until King's Landing, along with almost all of its inhabitants, is burned to the ground and the kingdom is in ruins. Not being satisfied with all the death and destruction her hysterical rage has caused so far, Daenerys Targaryen makes plans to destroy every land she has ever heard of. Jon Snow finally can't take any more of the insanity and kills her. If he had kept her in check from the beginning, hundreds of thousands of people would not have died, the kingdom would be far more prosperous, and he could have married her instead of killing her.
shes a little like trump?
Only when starts killing all you lying filth.
Mike I gotta tell you you are so off the tree that all your insults I find funny Can't believe anyone can post like you and still be serious
 

Forum List

Back
Top