Gabbard Blasts Own Party at Debate: Dem Party Isn't Of, By or For the People

“It is a party that has been and continues to be influenced by the foreign policy establishment in Washington, represented by Hillary Clinton and others’ foreign policy, by the military-industrial complex and other greedy corporate interests,” she added.

So they're just like the Republicans


I laugh

What happens every time Trump talks about removing troops somewhere?


The career progressives in the state dept and intelligence agencies freak out.
 
“It is a party that has been and continues to be influenced by the foreign policy establishment in Washington, represented by Hillary Clinton and others’ foreign policy, by the military-industrial complex and other greedy corporate interests,” she added.

So they're just like the Republicans


I laugh

Because you're clueless.


Poor baby
Why dont you go move some threads that you dont like.
 
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard took aim Wednesday at the Democratic Party establishment, claiming the party is not “of, by and for the people.”

During the Democratic presidential debate, Gabbard was asked about her feud with former Secretary of State and two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“Our Democratic Party, unfortunately, is not the party that is of, by and for the people,” Gabbard said.

(snip)

Gabbard said if she wins the presidency, “I will end this foreign policy, end these regime-change wars, work to end this new Cold War and arms race and instead invest our hard-earned taxpayer dollars actually into serving the needs of the American people.”



Gabbard Blasts Own Party at Debate: Dem Party Isn't Of, By or For the People


BJ -
HA!
Is she not watching what The State Department does when someone tries this?
Neither party is, but that never seems to get said either.
 
Gabbard's policies are to far left for me however her opinion about the Democratic Party is sound and the same could be said about the Republican Party. They both need new blood and new leadership that isn't tied to Wall St.
 
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard took aim Wednesday at the Democratic Party establishment, claiming the party is not “of, by and for the people.”

During the Democratic presidential debate, Gabbard was asked about her feud with former Secretary of State and two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“Our Democratic Party, unfortunately, is not the party that is of, by and for the people,” Gabbard said.

(snip)

Gabbard said if she wins the presidency, “I will end this foreign policy, end these regime-change wars, work to end this new Cold War and arms race and instead invest our hard-earned taxpayer dollars actually into serving the needs of the American people.”



Gabbard Blasts Own Party at Debate: Dem Party Isn't Of, By or For the People


BJ -
HA!
Is she not watching what The State Department does when someone tries this?
All of this impeachment inquiry proceedings has taken away the focus on Climate change. The Dems do not want to debate on stage about this. And so they creates distractions. When they do talk about the Green New Deal, they will only say how beautiful green that it is. But they will not discuss about what they will have to do in order to get this deal moving. But Pres.Trump is waiting for them to debate against him about it. But they are not going to debate about it publicly with those that opposes it.
Like Obama, he didn't want to go any further talking about his Obamacare. Only made beautiful promises to get people from off of the subject. But he already knew before hand that it was going to be a disaster. But he kept on encouraging the public to just go along with it to see what is in it.
But since they are pushing this deal all around the world all of the time. Then they should only debate about this topic for the whole entire debates. So that people can see what is inside of it. But they don't want anybody to see what is inside of it. They just want the public to just go along with it without questioning it, just like they has done to Obamacare.


 
She’s just looking to grow her brand and cash in someday like any presidential hopeful
 
If she believes what she says, then it is gravely dishonest of her to run as a Democrat.

To maintain any integrity, she must run independently.

Have to run within the party to try to tackle the way the nomination process is rigged, though. It's the only way.

That's the sole reason she won't run third party. It's why Ron didn't either.

I don't think people generally understand what she's trying to do here.
 
If she believes what she says, then it is gravely dishonest of her to run as a Democrat.

To maintain any integrity, she must run independently.

Have to run within the party to try to tackle the way the nomination process is rigged, though. It's the only way.

That's the sole reason she won't run third party. It's why Ron didn't either.

I don't think people generally understand what she's trying to do here.

There are too many war mongers for her to get done what she would like to get done. Oddly she could get a candidate to admit they would bomb Canada and their supporters will still support them.

Pete danced around the idea of attacking Mexico.
 
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard took aim Wednesday at the Democratic Party establishment, claiming the party is not “of, by and for the people.”

During the Democratic presidential debate, Gabbard was asked about her feud with former Secretary of State and two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“Our Democratic Party, unfortunately, is not the party that is of, by and for the people,” Gabbard said.

(snip)

Gabbard said if she wins the presidency, “I will end this foreign policy, end these regime-change wars, work to end this new Cold War and arms race and instead invest our hard-earned taxpayer dollars actually into serving the needs of the American people.”



Gabbard Blasts Own Party at Debate: Dem Party Isn't Of, By or For the People


BJ -
HA!
Is she not watching what The State Department does when someone tries this?

Telling the truth can get a democrat killed - the party doesn't cotton to those who expose them....
 
He moved a handful of people. We are still involved.
Our troops aren't. Speaking of moving why don't you leave the goalposts where they are?


Hundreds of U.S. Troops Leaving, and Also Arriving in, Syria

Once the comings and goings are done, the number of U.S. forces in Syria is expected to reach about 900

Hundreds of U.S. Troops Leaving, and Also Arriving in, Syria



WASHINGTON — Every day in northeastern Syria, waves of American troops are pulling out under President Trump’s order this month that paved the way for a Turkish offensive that included assaults on the Pentagon’s allies, the Syrian Kurds.

And at the same time, a separate wave of American troops from the opposite direction is pouring back in.


You were saying? This is the same crap Obama pulled in Iraq.
 

Forum List

Back
Top