Future V.P. Ryan NAILS it on the Benghazi debate topic

Ryan: If Obama Knew It Was Terror, Why Did He Send Rice Out To Say It Was The Video?

"If that was the case, George, then why send [U.N. Ambassador] Susan Rice out four days later to say this was the result of a spontaneous mob reacting to a YouTube video? Why go on “The View”? Why go on these other shows and not say the same thing? Look, that does not even hold water. What's troubling about this is as we learn more about it, these facts just don’t add up. That’s why we need to get to the bottom of this, so we can prevent something like this from happening again," Paul Ryan said about President Obama's claim that he labeled the Libya attack a terror attack the day after.
-- Ryan: If Obama Knew It Was Terror, Why Did He Send Rice Out To Say It Was The Video? | RealClearPolitics

you know... you guys don't even try anymore...

the whole future v.p. ryan thing (ptoi...don't conjure evil spirits)...

my boss would call it 'talking smack'.. its a means of trying to undermine and demoralize ones opponent... like when you play basketball.

the fact that these things are real life and not a game apparently escapes people.


:lol:

Not only are you in denial, old gal, but you are also talking silly talk.

Put aside the fact that The ONE is going down the toilet. No second term for him. Thank God!

More on topic is this thought: He was CAUGHT lying. He had his lard ass Secretary of State lie. He had Rice lie. He himself lied. And when Mitt CALLED him on it, he lied all the more and orchestrted with that Crowley beast to "confirm" it -- until she didn't.

:lmao:

Now back to your silly little nightmare. :D

President Romney and Vice President Ryan. Get used to it. Coming to an Inauguration in YOUR nation's capital January 2013!
 
There is NO Benghazi "debate." This was drummed up by right wing talk radio propagandists (like Sean Hannity in particular) to maintain the FEAR level of stupid Americans.

"Terrorism" is NOT a problem for Americans, despite the repeated screaching from the right wing fascists.

THere sure is a Benghazi debate. The President had his people lie about what happened. Then he got CAUGHT in his lie. Fuck him. Good.

The only thing "dreamed up" was his fictional account to cover up his own fucking failure. He sucks as President. And a dead Ambassador is tragic proof of that fact.

And terrorism sure was a problem on 9/11/2001, you fucking moron. And there have been other attacks before and SINCE then. You can thank George W. Bush that there haven't been other huge ones. Your lack of insight is duly noted. No wonder you like Pres. Obama. He's as shallow in his thinking and as lacking in foresight as you are.
 
Susan Rice's comments:

RICE: [O]ur current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous — not a premeditated — response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated.

We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to — or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in — in the wake of the revolution in Libya are — are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there.

We’ll wait to see exactly what the investigation finally confirms, but that’s the best information we have at present.

Instead of relying on Hannity et. al. to report this accurately, maybe you should just watch her comments yourself.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxf77xQ_NLU]Susan Rice 'This Week' Interview: U.S. Ambassador to UN Discusses Muslim Protest (09/2012) - YouTube[/ame]

So the best intelligence and estimate is that it was a spontaneous not a premeditated terrorist attack?

:cuckoo:

Face it. She was sent out on a disinformation mission.
 
So, you are afraid of "terrorists," LIABILITY? Just where in the hell do you live, anyway?

Yeah, terrorists are a REAL BIG PROBLEM.

LOL

Stupid right wingers.
 
That is exactly what I would want the terrorist who did it thinking.

"Wow they don't even know we planned it!"

"Say what's that up there in the sky........"
 
Here is Obama speaking at the United Nations two weeks after the four Americans were killed:

That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity.

I know that not all countries in this body share this understanding of the protection of free speech. Yet in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete. The question, then, is how we respond. And on this we must agree: there is no speech that justifies mindless violence.

There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy.

He mentions the video several times, but not once does he mention an "act of terror".

.



.

How many Embassy's were under attack during those two weeks? Wasn't it a Consulate building in Benghazi that was attacked not an Embassy?
 

Forum List

Back
Top