Future Colin Kaepernicks, Beware: You Can Get Fired for Political Speech

[AvgGuyIA]

He needs to shut up, and butt out...

Unless you can show proof of the same opinion for the statement " The police acted stupidly" by a certain black man who won the presidency,STFU.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

The supposed lie was about Lewinski. Try to at least pretend to be informed

. What part of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, ms Lewinski." Is "supposed"?

 

[harmonica]

he is protesting for black criminals and saying the police are wrong--not the criminals

 

[Spare_change]

He didn't infringe on their rights, when did he call for state censorship? It is you who doesn't understand the 1st amendment.

I wonder why all these Righties were upset about B. Clinton's sex life then.

It was a sexual harassment lawsuit and Clinton perjured himself and obstructed justice which is why the lying scumbag rapist was disbarred.

All because you think consensual sex between adults is any of your fucking business.

It wasn't about consensual sex it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit in which Clinton obstructed justice and perjured himself.

It was about Monica Lewinski. That was consensual sex between adults.

He didn't infringe on their rights, when did he call for state censorship? It is you who doesn't understand the 1st amendment.

I wonder why all these Righties were upset about B. Clinton's sex life then.

It was a sexual harassment lawsuit and Clinton perjured himself and obstructed justice which is why the lying scumbag rapist was disbarred.

All because you think consensual sex between adults is any of your fucking business.

It wasn't about consensual sex it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit in which Clinton obstructed justice and perjured himself.

It was about Monica Lewinski. That was consensual sex between adults.

No, it wasn't about Monica.

It was about perjury and obstruction of justice.

 

[Spare_change]

If this is the case, the players are doing a piss poor job of getting their message out.

People are not reacting to what they are protesting about, they are reacting to the method of protest.

If players want to protest, let them walk around the field holding picket signs before the national anthem. Hell, let them refuse to play!!

As for the players' so-called First Amendment right, that is, simply, not applicable. Owners do not have to allow them to protest. Fans can punish owners for not stopping it, and they can punish players for what they perceive as disrespect for the flag, for the country, and for its veterans.

You can say that the fans are misinterpreting the message all you want - the fact is that, if the players want to get THEIR message across, they need to find another way. Nobody is listening to what the players claim they are saying - they are only reacting to what they see the players do.

As for the President -- he represents the people, and he is telling the NFL what the people are saying. Problem is - they aren't listening.

So they can only protest in a manner that you approve of...lol.
Grow up asshole...

Your ignorance is only exceeded by your immaturity.

Nobody cares if they protest - people only care that the protest not disrespect the flag and the National Anthem.

But they are not disrespecting the flag or anthem or our country. They are kneeling in protest of a subject you should be protesting instead of haveing some pretend tissy fit.

It's not WHAT you protest ---- it's what you are PERCEIVED to be protesting.

No. The idea YOU think they protesting something is related to your ignorance, & stupidity.

The people protesting determine what they are protesting.

If this is the case, the players are doing a piss poor job of getting their message out.

People are not reacting to what they are protesting about, they are reacting to the method of protest.

If players want to protest, let them walk around the field holding picket signs before the national anthem. Hell, let them refuse to play!!

As for the players' so-called First Amendment right, that is, simply, not applicable. Owners do not have to allow them to protest. Fans can punish owners for not stopping it, and they can punish players for what they perceive as disrespect for the flag, for the country, and for its veterans.

You can say that the fans are misinterpreting the message all you want - the fact is that, if the players want to get THEIR message across, they need to find another way. Nobody is listening to what the players claim they are saying - they are only reacting to what they see the players do.

As for the President -- he represents the people, and he is telling the NFL what the people are saying. Problem is - they aren't listening.

So they can only protest in a manner that you approve of...lol.
Grow up asshole...

Your ignorance is only exceeded by your immaturity.

Nobody cares if they protest - people only care that the protest not disrespect the flag and the National Anthem.

But they are not disrespecting the flag or anthem or our country. They are kneeling in protest of a subject you should be protesting instead of haveing some pretend tissy fit.

It's not WHAT you protest ---- it's what you are PERCEIVED to be protesting.

No. The idea YOU think they protesting something is related to your ignorance, & stupidity.

The people protesting determine what they are protesting.

Hey, dumbass .... when you protest something, and nobody else knows what you're protesting about, they have a specific name for that ....

it's called a circle jerk.

 

[PraiseKek]

It was a sexual harassment lawsuit and Clinton perjured himself and obstructed justice which is why the lying scumbag rapist was disbarred.

All because you think consensual sex between adults is any of your fucking business.

It wasn't about consensual sex it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit in which Clinton obstructed justice and perjured himself.

It was about Monica Lewinski. That was consensual sex between adults.

No, it was about perjury stemming from an investigation into a sexual harrassment pattern. The investigation was prompted by Clinton's AG, Janet Reno.

The supposed lie was about Lewinski. Try to at least pretend to be informed.

Which was pertinent to the sexual harassment suit which he obstructed for which he was subsequently was disbarred.

 

[RealDave]

All because you think consensual sex between adults is any of your fucking business.

It wasn't about consensual sex it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit in which Clinton obstructed justice and perjured himself.

It was about Monica Lewinski. That was consensual sex between adults.

No, it was about perjury stemming from an investigation into a sexual harrassment pattern. The investigation was prompted by Clinton's AG, Janet Reno.

The supposed lie was about Lewinski. Try to at least pretend to be informed.

Which was pertinent to the sexual harassment suit which he obstructed for which he was subsequently was disbarred.

Bit it was still about consensual sex with Lewinski.

 

[RealDave]

So they can only protest in a manner that you approve of...lol.
Grow up asshole...

Your ignorance is only exceeded by your immaturity.

Nobody cares if they protest - people only care that the protest not disrespect the flag and the National Anthem.

But they are not disrespecting the flag or anthem or our country. They are kneeling in protest of a subject you should be protesting instead of haveing some pretend tissy fit.

It's not WHAT you protest ---- it's what you are PERCEIVED to be protesting.

No. The idea YOU think they protesting something is related to your ignorance, & stupidity.

The people protesting determine what they are protesting.

So they can only protest in a manner that you approve of...lol.
Grow up asshole...

Your ignorance is only exceeded by your immaturity.

Nobody cares if they protest - people only care that the protest not disrespect the flag and the National Anthem.

But they are not disrespecting the flag or anthem or our country. They are kneeling in protest of a subject you should be protesting instead of haveing some pretend tissy fit.

It's not WHAT you protest ---- it's what you are PERCEIVED to be protesting.

No. The idea YOU think they protesting something is related to your ignorance, & stupidity.

The people protesting determine what they are protesting.

Hey, dumbass .... when you protest something, and nobody else knows what you're protesting about, they have a specific name for that ....

it's called a circle jerk.

If you dumbass Trumpettes were informed, you would know exactly what was being protested,

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It wasn't about consensual sex it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit in which Clinton obstructed justice and perjured himself.

It was about Monica Lewinski. That was consensual sex between adults.

No, it was about perjury stemming from an investigation into a sexual harrassment pattern. The investigation was prompted by Clinton's AG, Janet Reno.

The supposed lie was about Lewinski. Try to at least pretend to be informed.

Which was pertinent to the sexual harassment suit which he obstructed for which he was subsequently was disbarred.

Bit it was still about consensual sex with Lewinski.

It was about perjury. Give it up. You're making yourself out to be a dupe.

 

[PraiseKek]

It wasn't about consensual sex it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit in which Clinton obstructed justice and perjured himself.

It was about Monica Lewinski. That was consensual sex between adults.

No, it was about perjury stemming from an investigation into a sexual harrassment pattern. The investigation was prompted by Clinton's AG, Janet Reno.

The supposed lie was about Lewinski. Try to at least pretend to be informed.

Which was pertinent to the sexual harassment suit which he obstructed for which he was subsequently was disbarred.

Bit it was still about consensual sex with Lewinski.

No it was about sexual harassment, perjury, and obstruction.

 

[reconmark]

If you weren't so stupid you would be hilarious.
First you lied and stated that trump never called for their firing.

Never said that you lying faggot.

When I proved you a liar now you want to backtrack and ignorantly claim that trump has a First Amendment Right to punish others for exercising their First Amendment Rights...

He didn't punish anyone, no fines have been imposed, no licenses rescinded, no legislation signed, and no arrests made.

Sigh...^^^^too stupid to know when you have utterly lost an argument...smh.

 

[Desperado]

Don't worry snowflakes, none of the millionaires are going to get fired. After all they are just doing the biding of the rich team owners.

But First Amendment experts say most employees can be fired from many jobs for exercising their freedom of speech.

Federal law does not protect workers in the private sector — only government employees.

“There is no federal law protecting against discrimination or retaliation for political activity” at private companies, Paula Brantner, a senior adviser at Workplace Fairness, told TheWrap. “A lot of people think they have First Amendment rights, but those only apply to government employees.”

Future Colin Kaepernicks, Beware: You Can Get Fired for Political Speech

Been this way for a long long time. Just ask John Rocker or Marge Schott both fired because of political and social beliefs.

 

[PraiseKek]

If you weren't so stupid you would be hilarious.
First you lied and stated that trump never called for their firing.

Never said that you lying faggot.

When I proved you a liar now you want to backtrack and ignorantly claim that trump has a First Amendment Right to punish others for exercising their First Amendment Rights...

He didn't punish anyone, no fines have been imposed, no licenses rescinded, no legislation signed, and no arrests made.

Sigh...^^^^too stupid to know when you have utterly lost an argument...smh.

What state censorship has been imposed faggot? The POTUS expressing his opinion is not state censorship you dumb fuck...kys.

 

[reconmark]

If you weren't so stupid you would be hilarious.
First you lied and stated that trump never called for their firing.

Never said that you lying faggot.

When I proved you a liar now you want to backtrack and ignorantly claim that trump has a First Amendment Right to punish others for exercising their First Amendment Rights...

He didn't punish anyone, no fines have been imposed, no licenses rescinded, no legislation signed, and no arrests made.

Sigh...^^^^too stupid to know when you have utterly lost an argument...smh.

What state censorship has been imposed faggot? The POTUS expressing his opinion is not state censorship you dumb fuck...kys.

Too stupid to know when you have lost the argument...

 

[PraiseKek]

If you weren't so stupid you would be hilarious.
First you lied and stated that trump never called for their firing.

Never said that you lying faggot.

When I proved you a liar now you want to backtrack and ignorantly claim that trump has a First Amendment Right to punish others for exercising their First Amendment Rights...

He didn't punish anyone, no fines have been imposed, no licenses rescinded, no legislation signed, and no arrests made.

Sigh...^^^^too stupid to know when you have utterly lost an argument...smh.

What state censorship has been imposed faggot? The POTUS expressing his opinion is not state censorship you dumb fuck...kys.

Too stupid to know when you have lost the argument...

What state censorship has been imposed faggot?

 

[reconmark]

If you weren't so stupid you would be hilarious.
First you lied and stated that trump never called for their firing.

Never said that you lying faggot.

When I proved you a liar now you want to backtrack and ignorantly claim that trump has a First Amendment Right to punish others for exercising their First Amendment Rights...

He didn't punish anyone, no fines have been imposed, no licenses rescinded, no legislation signed, and no arrests made.

Sigh...^^^^too stupid to know when you have utterly lost an argument...smh.

What state censorship has been imposed faggot? The POTUS expressing his opinion is not state censorship you dumb fuck...kys.

Too stupid to know when you have lost the argument...

What state censorship has been imposed faggot?

You can continue to ask questions that prove your ignorance of the 1st Amendment...guess what...your ignorance will remain evident because you are too stupid to educate yourself...
No need to call you a faggot, that's an insult to faggots...

 

[PraiseKek]

Never said that you lying faggot.


He didn't punish anyone, no fines have been imposed, no licenses rescinded, no legislation signed, and no arrests made.

Sigh...^^^^too stupid to know when you have utterly lost an argument...smh.

What state censorship has been imposed faggot? The POTUS expressing his opinion is not state censorship you dumb fuck...kys.

Too stupid to know when you have lost the argument...

What state censorship has been imposed faggot?

You can continue to ask questions that prove your ignorance of the 1st Amendment...guess what...your ignorance will remain evident because you are too stupid to educate yourself...
No need to call you a faggot, that's an insult to faggots...

What state censorship has been imposed faggot?

 

[reconmark]

Sigh...^^^^too stupid to know when you have utterly lost an argument...smh.

What state censorship has been imposed faggot? The POTUS expressing his opinion is not state censorship you dumb fuck...kys.

Too stupid to know when you have lost the argument...

What state censorship has been imposed faggot?

You can continue to ask questions that prove your ignorance of the 1st Amendment...guess what...your ignorance will remain evident because you are too stupid to educate yourself...
No need to call you a faggot, that's an insult to faggots...

What state censorship has been imposed faggot?

Why does it hurt you so, that I make you look like an ignorant imbecile???

 

[Rustic]

Don't worry snowflakes, none of the millionaires are going to get fired. After all they are just doing the biding of the rich team owners.

But First Amendment experts say most employees can be fired from many jobs for exercising their freedom of speech.

Federal law does not protect workers in the private sector — only government employees.

“There is no federal law protecting against discrimination or retaliation for political activity” at private companies, Paula Brantner, a senior adviser at Workplace Fairness, told TheWrap. “A lot of people think they have First Amendment rights, but those only apply to government employees.”

Future Colin Kaepernicks, Beware: You Can Get Fired for Political Speech

Colin Kaepernick is a reallly, really shitty player, and a shittier person…

 

[Rustic]

Of course it's up to the private owners....

The President of the USA should have kept his trap shut....

Why? He has the right to speak, too, and a responsibility to do so when he represents the highest authority of what those players are protesting.

He has no responsibility. His responsibility is to defend the Constitution of the US. Not to use the flag and anthem as a political weapon. Trump and his supporters are in-American and fake patriots. This truly is starting to look like Nazi Germany. The Nazis burned books that did not conform and now Trump and his supporters are invoking Hitler and the Nazis and burning things that do not conform to their warped view of the world.

Do You have shit for brains?