Fukushima disaster: worse than Hiroshima

Discussion in 'Energy' started by appleannie1, Aug 4, 2011.

  1. appleannie1
    Offline

    appleannie1 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    60
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +15
    While the Bloomberg news report overnight of two extremely high radiation readings being recorded at the Fukushima complex of nuclear plants on August 1 and August 2 are alarming, other significant disclosures are also made in this story.

    The reading of 10 sieverts of radiation per hour outside the damaged reactor buildings was the highest level the equipment used could have detected, meaning the lethality of the contamination was off the scale; and
    For the first time a tenured nuclear expert Tetsuo Ito, the head of the Atomic Energy Research Institute at Kinki University concedes that the melted cores of one or more reactors may have melted through the supposedly failure proof containment vessel floor, sinking deeper into the subsoil and given the nature of the radioactive material concerned, into a position where it can spread a very long distance directly through the subsoil water table.

    Fukushima nuclear disaster: social media captures the true extent of contamination | Crikey
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    32,070
    Thanks Received:
    4,424
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +13,565
    All sorts of speculation, zero scientific data. Lots of "may haves, and could ofs, and possiblys."

    And comparing this to hiroshima is insulting to those who survived that blast.
     
  3. appleannie1
    Offline

    appleannie1 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    60
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +15
    Do you also think it is insulting to the people of Japan that are being bombarded with radiation today to continue to be assured that it is safe?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    32,070
    Thanks Received:
    4,424
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +13,565
    If there was hard proof that the excess radiation from fukishima was harmful, then yes it would be. So far we haven't seen any of it. The 10 Sv/hr reading was between the two reactors inside the plant, not in the general population.

    Hiroshima also had that whole explosion thing, which didn't happen at the plant. And before you bring it up, the hydrogen explosions were not nuclear.
     
  5. TruthSeeker56
    Offline

    TruthSeeker56 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,899
    Thanks Received:
    484
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Ratings:
    +502
    Ever heard of TIME, DISTANCE, and SHIELDING. I didn't think so. :cuckoo:

    Just for the record, the highest radiation readings were 400 mSv per hour. You do the math, Einstein. :anj_stfu:
     
  6. percysunshine
    Offline

    percysunshine Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    18,544
    Thanks Received:
    2,442
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Sty
    Ratings:
    +8,075
    Well, they both end in '...shima.

    Of course, so does sushi...
     
  7. TruthSeeker56
    Offline

    TruthSeeker56 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,899
    Thanks Received:
    484
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Ratings:
    +502
    Good point, percy. You discovered the ONLY common link between the two! :clap2:
     
  8. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Feels Good! Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    24,176
    Thanks Received:
    5,256
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +8,118
  9. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    72,827
    Thanks Received:
    8,887
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +32,270
    Number of fatalities:

    Hiroshima: 90,000–140,000
    Fukushima: 0

    So which one was worse?

     
  10. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,792
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,810
    why don't you go over there and check it out to see if it harms you?
     

Share This Page