Frustration With Polling Metrics Leads To Creation of unskewedpolls.com...

[beretta304]

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

I hope rightwinger hears that.

Got you sweating don't I?

That's it?



Those gums of yours were going a mile a minute about an hour ago.

 

[Dr.House]

Come on Beretta, you know this website is a farce... I know that you can see that.

Or was it a joke, just meant to poke the flames?

Is it? Guess we'll find out on Election Day? Is the Colorado one a joke as well?

Which part of "Proving once again the polls mean SHIT!" don't you Libs get.

I posted it for conversation just like all the 12,000 polls the left has posted here for the last month.

What makes you so pompous as to think that only what the left posts is credible.

A poll is nothing more than a guess.

The Colorado poll has 100% accuracy rate. Want to discredit that one as well?


No one can be right or wrong until we get the results.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

So why are you hanging your hat on polls that oversample democratics using 2008 exit poll turnout results?

 

[daveman]

In other words "We right wingers are all butthurt that Willard is getting his ass kicked, so we are going to fudge numbers and make up our own polls to put Willard in the lead"

What an effin' joke!

You just don't possess any critical thinking skills do you?

The only accurate polls are the ones that show Obama a zillion points ahead.

Right, B_L?

 

[daveman]

I think any poll that declares itself unskewed is probably very skewed

Kind of like Foxes "Fair and Balanced" Declaration

Or Obama's "most transparent Administration ever"?

Now THERE'S a load of fresh manure.

 

[Black_Label]

In other words "We right wingers are all butthurt that Willard is getting his ass kicked, so we are going to fudge numbers and make up our own polls to put Willard in the lead"

What an effin' joke!

You just don't possess any critical thinking skills do you?

The only accurate polls are the ones that show Obama a zillion points ahead.

Right, B_L?

I'm not like the right wingers that grab onto rasmussen and other heavily biased hard right wing polls simply because they tell them what they want to hear. Myself, like virtually everyone else not on the hard right follow pollsters that have a long history of being the most accurate and show the truth.

RCP has long been the most accurate in polls to final result accuracy being off by only 0.3 in 2008.

Right now they have Obama up by 3.7

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

 

[theDoctorisIn]

That website should be called "confirmationbias.com".

"You'll believe our polls, because you really, really want to"

 

[Black_Label]

Now this is hilarious, even the hard right wing Rasmussen is calling the unskewed site bullshit

"Even the founder of Rasmussen Reports, whose surveys often show higher Republican numbers, cast doubt on Chambers' methods: Scott Rasmussen told BuzzFeed in an e-mail that "you cannot compare partisan weighting from one polling firm to another."

Conservatives Embrace Alternate Polling Reality

 

[daveman]

You just don't possess any critical thinking skills do you?

The only accurate polls are the ones that show Obama a zillion points ahead.

Right, B_L?

I'm not like the right wingers that grab onto rasmussen and other heavily biased hard right wing polls simply because they tell them what they want to hear. Myself, like virtually everyone else not on the hard right follow pollsters that have a long history of being the most accurate and show the truth.

RCP has long been the most accurate in polls to final result accuracy being off by only 0.3 in 2008.

Right now they have Obama up by 3.7

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

Of course, if they showed Romney winning, you'd say they were shit.

 

[Old Rocks]

President Obama 247 Governor Romney 191

RealClearPolitics - 2012 Election Maps - Electoral Map

Colorado President Obama 2.3, 7 polls, Obama leading in 6 of them

Florida President Obama 2.2 8 polls, Obama leading in 6 of them

Iowa President Obama 4.0 3 polls, Obama leading in 2 of them

Nevada President Obama 3.4 5 polls, Obama leading in all of them

New Hampshire President Obama 1.0 3 polls, Obama leading in 2 of them

North Carolina President Obama 1.0 5 polls, Obama leading in 4 of them

Ohio President Obama 4.1 6 polls, Obama leading in all of them

Virginia President Obama 4.5 7 polls, Obama leading in all of them.

Easy to see why the fruitloops are so upset with the polls.

 

[Archibald]

The Colorado Study? It's 100% spot-on. If you looked at the election as a model, Romney should be winning. He should be putting Barack Obama away. But here's the thing: he isn't. America is a mess; the economy is stagnant, the debt crisis is looming, the Middle East is in chaos, and Barack Obama is still winning. The only polls that show Mitt up are on a site that Scott Rasmussen himself thinks is cooked. Mitt Romney is the least popular candidate in recent history; his campaign has been tumbling from blunder to blunder, and he's losing an election that Republicans could have won.

 

[candycorn]

.

Bookmarked it, should be interesting to see how it does on Election Day.

Which I CAN'T WAIT to see come and go.

.

My bet is that it doesn't get updated after 10/20. I have it bookmarked as well! Should be delicious come 11/6.

 

[candycorn]

The libs are going to be in for a surprise very soon.

Why, because you're going to walk and chew gum?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now this is hilarious, even the hard right wing Rasmussen is calling the unskewed site bullshit

"Even the founder of Rasmussen Reports, whose surveys often show higher Republican numbers, cast doubt on Chambers' methods: Scott Rasmussen told BuzzFeed in an e-mail that "you cannot compare partisan weighting from one polling firm to another."

Conservatives Embrace Alternate Polling Reality

Rasmussen is probably pissed that someone else is trying to worm his way into the lucrative business of telling rightwingers what they want to hear.