Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't understand...
Is this a joke? Seriously...
A website that has text non-add links to all GOP websites and links to all Qstar news affiliates is "not skewed"?
Please tell me this is a joke..
I think it's an offshoot of the "Onion".
Just look at 538.com. That will tell you all you need to know. Nate Silver is the best in the business. He analyzes wich polls skew right and left and has a formula that has been more accurate than any poll. Currently he has Obama with a 75% chance to win again. If he had Romney at 75% I would still say he is the best in the business.
I don't understand...
Is this a joke? Seriously...
A website that has text non-add links to all GOP websites and links to all Qstar news affiliates is "not skewed"?
Please tell me this is a joke..
"I don't understand"
What you really mean is...you don't want to understand. Everyone else did. Give it time and you may figure it out. Perhaps jilly can explain it to you.
Just look at 538.com. That will tell you all you need to know. Nate Silver is the best in the business. He analyzes wich polls skew right and left and has a formula that has been more accurate than any poll. Currently he has Obama with a 75% chance to win again. If he had Romney at 75% I would still say he is the best in the business.
Mr. Obamas numbers also held steady, at a four-point lead among likely voters, in a United Press International national poll, which is being published roughly once per week.
Over all, Saturdays data seemed like a total wash so why did Mr. Obamas forecast improve, even incrementally?
The reason is that we are now getting to the point where a neutral day in the polls can be thought as being ever-so-slightly favorable to Mr. Obama, since he leads in the race and since Mr. Romney now has only 45 days to make up the deficit. This will be especially true over the course of the next week or so, during which time the penalty that the model has been applying to Mr. Obamas polls because of the potential aftereffects of the Democratic convention will phase out.
I don't understand...
Is this a joke? Seriously...
A website that has text non-add links to all GOP websites and links to all Qstar news affiliates is "not skewed"?
Please tell me this is a joke..
"I don't understand"
What you really mean is...you don't want to understand. Everyone else did. Give it time and you may figure it out. Perhaps jilly can explain it to you.
Come on Beretta, you know this website is a farce... I know that you can see that.
Or was it a joke, just meant to poke the flames?
Just look at 538.com. That will tell you all you need to know. Nate Silver is the best in the business. He analyzes wich polls skew right and left and has a formula that has been more accurate than any poll. Currently he has Obama with a 75% chance to win again. If he had Romney at 75% I would still say he is the best in the business.
And they have 100% accuracy rate:
Analysis of election factors points to Romney win, University of Colorado study says | University of Colorado Boulder
And?
As I said:
Proving once again the polls mean SHIT!
Just look at 538.com. That will tell you all you need to know. Nate Silver is the best in the business. He analyzes wich polls skew right and left and has a formula that has been more accurate than any poll. Currently he has Obama with a 75% chance to win again. If he had Romney at 75% I would still say he is the best in the business.
From 538
Mr. Obamas numbers also held steady, at a four-point lead among likely voters, in a United Press International national poll, which is being published roughly once per week.
Over all, Saturdays data seemed like a total wash so why did Mr. Obamas forecast improve, even incrementally?
The reason is that we are now getting to the point where a neutral day in the polls can be thought as being ever-so-slightly favorable to Mr. Obama, since he leads in the race and since Mr. Romney now has only 45 days to make up the deficit. This will be especially true over the course of the next week or so, during which time the penalty that the model has been applying to Mr. Obamas polls because of the potential aftereffects of the Democratic convention will phase out.
Forecast gives Obama a 77.6% chance of winning. Eventually the Nowcast and Forecast will converge most likely somewhere near 85-90% as the election gets closer.
Just look at 538.com. That will tell you all you need to know. Nate Silver is the best in the business. He analyzes wich polls skew right and left and has a formula that has been more accurate than any poll. Currently he has Obama with a 75% chance to win again. If he had Romney at 75% I would still say he is the best in the business.
they don't like nate.... too much reality.
"Nate" She's on a first name basis with him now! 
I don't understand...
Is this a joke? Seriously...
A website that has text non-add links to all GOP websites and links to all Qstar news affiliates is "not skewed"?
Please tell me this is a joke..
"I don't understand"
What you really mean is...you don't want to understand. Everyone else did. Give it time and you may figure it out. Perhaps jilly can explain it to you.
Come on Beretta, you know this website is a farce... I know that you can see that.
Or was it a joke, just meant to poke the flames?
"I don't understand"
What you really mean is...you don't want to understand. Everyone else did. Give it time and you may figure it out. Perhaps jilly can explain it to you.
Come on Beretta, you know this website is a farce... I know that you can see that.
Or was it a joke, just meant to poke the flames?
nah... the whining psycho just figures if you put out meaningless, unscientific, skewed polls, you can say "polls have no meaning" instead of actually admitting reality.
but why would we expect anything meaningful from the troll.
Ask "Nate" about it when you talk to him next time.
Just look at 538.com. That will tell you all you need to know. Nate Silver is the best in the business. He analyzes wich polls skew right and left and has a formula that has been more accurate than any poll. Currently he has Obama with a 75% chance to win again. If he had Romney at 75% I would still say he is the best in the business.
From 538
Mr. Obama’s numbers also held steady, at a four-point lead among likely voters, in a United Press International national poll, which is being published roughly once per week.
Over all, Saturday’s data seemed like a total wash — so why did Mr. Obama’s forecast improve, even incrementally?
The reason is that we are now getting to the point where a neutral day in the polls can be thought as being ever-so-slightly favorable to Mr. Obama, since he leads in the race and since Mr. Romney now has only 45 days to make up the deficit. This will be especially true over the course of the next week or so, during which time the penalty that the model has been applying to Mr. Obama’s polls because of the potential aftereffects of the Democratic convention will phase out.
Forecast gives Obama a 77.6% chance of winning. Eventually the Nowcast and Forecast will converge most likely somewhere near 85-90% as the election gets closer.
And for the third and final time...the Colorado study has 100% accuracy. What can I help you understand?
From 538
Forecast gives Obama a 77.6% chance of winning. Eventually the Nowcast and Forecast will converge most likely somewhere near 85-90% as the election gets closer.
And for the third and final time...the Colorado study has 100% accuracy. What can I help you understand?
The Colorado model has predicted correctly since 1980. A sample size of eight
I have correctly predicted every Presidential election since 1964. Not really bragging because they tend to not be very hard to predict (this is one of the easier ones to predict)
The weakness of the Colorado model is its economic factors. To assume that the economic collapse of 2007-2008 is the same as every other economic setback since 1980 is not a good predictor. Assuming that EVERY swing state will reverse and support Romney shows their model is crap
Just look at 538.com. That will tell you all you need to know. Nate Silver is the best in the business. He analyzes wich polls skew right and left and has a formula that has been more accurate than any poll. Currently he has Obama with a 75% chance to win again. If he had Romney at 75% I would still say he is the best in the business.
And for the third and final time...the Colorado study has 100% accuracy. What can I help you understand?
The Colorado model has predicted correctly since 1980. A sample size of eight
I have correctly predicted every Presidential election since 1964. Not really bragging because they tend to not be very hard to predict (this is one of the easier ones to predict)
The weakness of the Colorado model is its economic factors. To assume that the economic collapse of 2007-2008 is the same as every other economic setback since 1980 is not a good predictor. Assuming that EVERY swing state will reverse and support Romney shows their model is crap
You do realize that you just said a whole lot of absolutely nothing nor did you disprove a thing?
You predicted?
When Obama wins, claim 100% accuracy...till then...wait with the rest of us. You have no more inside knowledge than flipping a coin.
The Colorado model has predicted correctly since 1980. A sample size of eight
I have correctly predicted every Presidential election since 1964. Not really bragging because they tend to not be very hard to predict (this is one of the easier ones to predict)
The weakness of the Colorado model is its economic factors. To assume that the economic collapse of 2007-2008 is the same as every other economic setback since 1980 is not a good predictor. Assuming that EVERY swing state will reverse and support Romney shows their model is crap
You do realize that you just said a whole lot of absolutely nothing nor did you disprove a thing?
You predicted?
When Obama wins, claim 100% accuracy...till then...wait with the rest of us. You have no more inside knowledge than flipping a coin.
My record of predicting Presidential elections is better than the University of Colorado model. It is not saying much because most Presidential elections are not that difficult to predict.
Lets wait till after the election and see how the University of Colorado still claims to have gotten it right in spite of an overwhelming Obama victory
"I don't understand"
What you really mean is...you don't want to understand. Everyone else did. Give it time and you may figure it out. Perhaps jilly can explain it to you.
Come on Beretta, you know this website is a farce... I know that you can see that.
Or was it a joke, just meant to poke the flames?
Is it? Guess we'll find out on Election Day? Is the Colorado one a joke as well?
Which part of "Proving once again the polls mean SHIT!" don't you Libs get.
I posted it for conversation just like all the 12,000 polls the left has posted here for the last month.
What makes you so pompous as to think that only what the left posts is credible.
A poll is nothing more than a guess.
The Colorado poll has 100% accuracy rate. Want to discredit that one as well?
No one can be right or wrong until we get the results.
Come on Beretta, you know this website is a farce... I know that you can see that.
Or was it a joke, just meant to poke the flames?
Is it? Guess we'll find out on Election Day? Is the Colorado one a joke as well?
Which part of "Proving once again the polls mean SHIT!" don't you Libs get.
I posted it for conversation just like all the 12,000 polls the left has posted here for the last month.
What makes you so pompous as to think that only what the left posts is credible.
A poll is nothing more than a guess.
The Colorado poll has 100% accuracy rate. Want to discredit that one as well?
No one can be right or wrong until we get the results.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Is it? Guess we'll find out on Election Day? Is the Colorado one a joke as well?
Which part of "Proving once again the polls mean SHIT!" don't you Libs get.
I posted it for conversation just like all the 12,000 polls the left has posted here for the last month.
What makes you so pompous as to think that only what the left posts is credible.
A poll is nothing more than a guess.
The Colorado poll has 100% accuracy rate. Want to discredit that one as well?
No one can be right or wrong until we get the results.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
I hope rightwinger hears that.
