Gunny
Gold Member
NuclearWinter said:
You mean there are more like you?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
From World War 3 To The Age of Peace (2006-2012)
- Thread starter NuclearWinter
- Start date
You mean there are more like you?
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #82
It's also important to note that this year (2006) might feature a Major Earthquake for Japan. It might not, however, be the cause of Japan sinking beneath the ocean.
All I know is that this year we should expect the quake, but after that it could be any year between 2006-2012 that Japan goes under the sea. There is not a set date though. It would obviously most likely happen around 2009-2012 though when Earth will be producing disasters like never before seen and may possibly culminate in the Pole Shift which will be the grand finale anytime between those 3 years as well.
All I know is that this year we should expect the quake, but after that it could be any year between 2006-2012 that Japan goes under the sea. There is not a set date though. It would obviously most likely happen around 2009-2012 though when Earth will be producing disasters like never before seen and may possibly culminate in the Pole Shift which will be the grand finale anytime between those 3 years as well.
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #83
If we all looked up and faced it, this World War 3 disaster could be avoided, but ignorance and denial always ensure that we will get the full force and the most extreme consequences, because it strikes when we least expect it and when we are the least prepared. People say ignorance is bliss, but only for so long.
We create our own reality by our thoughts and actions. For every action or non-action there is a consequence. When we give our minds and our responsibility away, we give our lives away. If enough of us do it, we give the World away. This is precisely what we have been doing throughout known Human history. This is why the few have always controlled the masses.
We create our own reality by our thoughts and actions. For every action or non-action there is a consequence. When we give our minds and our responsibility away, we give our lives away. If enough of us do it, we give the World away. This is precisely what we have been doing throughout known Human history. This is why the few have always controlled the masses.
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #84
I have reason to believe that the majority of World War 3 will be fought on the Middle Eastern Continent. I also have reason to believe that while all of our "fighters" are out there fighting World War 3, America will be left vulnerable and much much more easy for the government to introduce it's new policies and restrictions for the people. To take the action required with their plan for their "New World Order". After all, who will be here to stop them? Not while blood is being shed everywhere and the entire World is on the brink of Nuclear disaster!
I also have reason to believe that one of the biggest battles of World War 3 will be fought in and around Egypt. the very place where much of the Sun worshipping and black magic nonsense started in the first place.
And the rivers of Egypt ran red, and they were as blood.
Of course they will be. With all the dead bodies that will be strewn about, and many of them falling into rivers, I would be suprised to see a river around that area that will not be filled with blood. The blood of all the dead soldiers. From both sides of the World.
I also have reason to believe that one of the biggest battles of World War 3 will be fought in and around Egypt. the very place where much of the Sun worshipping and black magic nonsense started in the first place.
And the rivers of Egypt ran red, and they were as blood.
Of course they will be. With all the dead bodies that will be strewn about, and many of them falling into rivers, I would be suprised to see a river around that area that will not be filled with blood. The blood of all the dead soldiers. From both sides of the World.
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #85
Yes. There are many more like me. For example.....
Poll: Americans Say World War III Likely
By WILL LESTER, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - Americans are far more likely than the Japanese to expect another world war in their lifetime, according to AP-Kyodo polling 60 years after World War II ended. Most people in both countries believe the first use of a nuclear weapon is never justified.
Those findings come six decades after the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The war claimed about 400,000 U.S. troops around the world, more than three times that many Japanese troops and at least 300,000 Japanese civilians.
Out of the ashes, Japan and the United States forged a close political alliance. Americans and Japanese now generally have good feelings about each other.
But people in the two countries have very different views on everything from the U.S. use of the atomic bomb in 1945, fears of North Korea and the American military presence in Japan.
Some of the widest differences came on expectations of a new world war.
Six in 10 Americans said they think such a war is likely, while only one-third of the Japanese said so, according to polling done in both countries for The Associated Press and Kyodo, the Japanese news service.
"Man's going to destroy man eventually. When that will be, I don't know," said Gaye Lestaeghe of Freeport, La.
Some question whether that war has arrived, with fighting dragging on in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of the U.S. campaign against terrorism.
"I feel like we're in a world war right now," said Susan Aser, a real estate agent from Rochester, N.Y.
The Japanese were less likely than Americans to expect a world war, less worried about the threat from North Korea and less inclined to say a first strike with nuclear weapons could be justified.
"The Japanese people take peace for granted," said Hiroya Sato, 20, of Tokyo. "The Japanese people are not interested in things like war."
President Truman decided to try to end the war by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, and on Nagasaki three days later.
The first two atomic bombs killed tens of thousands in Hiroshima and Nagasaki; thousands more gradually died with severe radiation burns. Those bombings led to Japan's announcement on Aug. 15 that it would surrender.
Two-thirds of Americans say the use of atomic bombs was unavoidable. Only 20 percent of Japanese felt that way and three-fourths said it was not necessary. Just one-half of Americans approve of the use of the atomic bombs on Japan.
Bob Garapedian, an 81-year-old retiree from Colchester, Conn., was preparing to fly fighter planes over the planned invasion of Japan when the war ended. Asked whether using the atomic bomb was appropriate, he said without hesitation: "Absolutely!"
But military instructor Hugh "D.J." Carlen, who lives near Fort Knox, Ky., said: "I don't think we really needed to do it. We darn near had the country starved to death. We could have effected a blockade."
Skepticism about the bombings is widespread in Japan.
"I often hear the bombings were not necessary," said Toyokazu Katsumi, a 27-year-old engineer from Yokohama. "They just wanted to experiment with them."
For 63-year-old Masashi Muroi of Tokyo, the attacks with atomic bombs "were mass, indiscriminate killings and perhaps violated international law."
For younger people, World War II is something seen only on newsreel footage, in the movies and in history books. For those who lived through it, the memories are vivid.
Hideko Mori, a 71-year-old Tokyo housewife, said that as a child in Nagano in central Japan, she and her neighbors had to take refuge to avoid American air raids.
"Around the time I was in the 5th grade, when we went to school, instead of attending classes, we plowed the school grounds and planted potatoes and pumpkins, and we dug up bomb shelters," she said.
People in both countries overwhelmingly perceive the other country favorably now.
Four in five Americans have an upbeat view of Japan and two-thirds of Japanese feel that way about the U.S. But older people were not quite as enthusiastic.
"I dislike the Japanese military, but not the Japanese people," World War II veteran William Aleshire, 84, of Peachtree City, Ga., said during a recent visit to a war memorial in Washington.
Some of the good feelings may stem from the close cooperation between the U.S. and Japan in postwar rebuilding and from America's financial support.
During the years when American troops occupied Japan, economic reforms enabled Japanese farmers to own their own land. With U.S. help, Japan grew into an economic power.
"The Americans contributed so much to the reconstruction of Japan after the war. I think their influence was very significant and positive," said 62-year-old Yasuzo Higuchi of Tokyo. "Even now, because of their presence in our country, North Korea can't attack us."
Americans' good will about the Japanese extends to their government, with six in 10 in the U.S. regarding it as trustworthy. But more than half of the Japanese distrust Washington.
Asked whether a first strike with nuclear weapons ever could be justified, a majority in both countries said no. But Americans were twice as likely as the Japanese to think such a strike might be justified in some circumstances.
Since the war, the U.S. military presence in Japan has come to be accepted in most of Japan, but stirs resentment on the island of Okinawa.
The Japanese are evenly split on whether the U.S. troops should stay or go, the polling found. Three-fourths of Americans said this country should keep its military in Japan.
"Any country that will allow us to keep a base there as a forward lookout post, I think we ought to do it," said Wade Hill, a copier technician who lives near Dallas. "We need a buffer zone."
The strongest rivalry between the U.S. and Japan now is economic. The presence of Americans products has increased in Japan, though Tokyo continues to have a large trade surplus with Washington.
Japanese are most likely to name the U.S. as the most important country for their economy, possibly a reflection of the success among Americans for Japanese automobiles and electronics. Americans were most likely to name China as most important for the U.S. economy.
Trade tensions have increased between the United States and China after America ran up a $162 billion deficit with China last year, the largest ever with a single country.
Some see economic competition as the most important battle between countries these days.
"I don't think it will be like World War II," said James DiVita of Sandusky, Ohio, who works in manufacturing. "It will be more of a silent takeover with dollars, buying up companies."
The poll of 1,000 adults in the United States was conducted for the AP by Ipsos, an international polling company, from July 5-10 and the poll of 1,045 eligible voters in Japan was conducted for Kyodo by the Public Opinion Research Center from July 1-3. Each poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
___
Associated Press writers Chisaki Watanabe and Aiko Hayashi in Tokyo, and AP's manager of surveys Trevor Tompson contributed to this report.
On the Net:
An interactive detailing poll questions and responses is available at:
http://wid.ap.org/polls/japanus/index.html
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...rld_war_ii_poll
Poll: Americans Say World War III Likely
By WILL LESTER, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - Americans are far more likely than the Japanese to expect another world war in their lifetime, according to AP-Kyodo polling 60 years after World War II ended. Most people in both countries believe the first use of a nuclear weapon is never justified.
Those findings come six decades after the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The war claimed about 400,000 U.S. troops around the world, more than three times that many Japanese troops and at least 300,000 Japanese civilians.
Out of the ashes, Japan and the United States forged a close political alliance. Americans and Japanese now generally have good feelings about each other.
But people in the two countries have very different views on everything from the U.S. use of the atomic bomb in 1945, fears of North Korea and the American military presence in Japan.
Some of the widest differences came on expectations of a new world war.
Six in 10 Americans said they think such a war is likely, while only one-third of the Japanese said so, according to polling done in both countries for The Associated Press and Kyodo, the Japanese news service.
"Man's going to destroy man eventually. When that will be, I don't know," said Gaye Lestaeghe of Freeport, La.
Some question whether that war has arrived, with fighting dragging on in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of the U.S. campaign against terrorism.
"I feel like we're in a world war right now," said Susan Aser, a real estate agent from Rochester, N.Y.
The Japanese were less likely than Americans to expect a world war, less worried about the threat from North Korea and less inclined to say a first strike with nuclear weapons could be justified.
"The Japanese people take peace for granted," said Hiroya Sato, 20, of Tokyo. "The Japanese people are not interested in things like war."
President Truman decided to try to end the war by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, and on Nagasaki three days later.
The first two atomic bombs killed tens of thousands in Hiroshima and Nagasaki; thousands more gradually died with severe radiation burns. Those bombings led to Japan's announcement on Aug. 15 that it would surrender.
Two-thirds of Americans say the use of atomic bombs was unavoidable. Only 20 percent of Japanese felt that way and three-fourths said it was not necessary. Just one-half of Americans approve of the use of the atomic bombs on Japan.
Bob Garapedian, an 81-year-old retiree from Colchester, Conn., was preparing to fly fighter planes over the planned invasion of Japan when the war ended. Asked whether using the atomic bomb was appropriate, he said without hesitation: "Absolutely!"
But military instructor Hugh "D.J." Carlen, who lives near Fort Knox, Ky., said: "I don't think we really needed to do it. We darn near had the country starved to death. We could have effected a blockade."
Skepticism about the bombings is widespread in Japan.
"I often hear the bombings were not necessary," said Toyokazu Katsumi, a 27-year-old engineer from Yokohama. "They just wanted to experiment with them."
For 63-year-old Masashi Muroi of Tokyo, the attacks with atomic bombs "were mass, indiscriminate killings and perhaps violated international law."
For younger people, World War II is something seen only on newsreel footage, in the movies and in history books. For those who lived through it, the memories are vivid.
Hideko Mori, a 71-year-old Tokyo housewife, said that as a child in Nagano in central Japan, she and her neighbors had to take refuge to avoid American air raids.
"Around the time I was in the 5th grade, when we went to school, instead of attending classes, we plowed the school grounds and planted potatoes and pumpkins, and we dug up bomb shelters," she said.
People in both countries overwhelmingly perceive the other country favorably now.
Four in five Americans have an upbeat view of Japan and two-thirds of Japanese feel that way about the U.S. But older people were not quite as enthusiastic.
"I dislike the Japanese military, but not the Japanese people," World War II veteran William Aleshire, 84, of Peachtree City, Ga., said during a recent visit to a war memorial in Washington.
Some of the good feelings may stem from the close cooperation between the U.S. and Japan in postwar rebuilding and from America's financial support.
During the years when American troops occupied Japan, economic reforms enabled Japanese farmers to own their own land. With U.S. help, Japan grew into an economic power.
"The Americans contributed so much to the reconstruction of Japan after the war. I think their influence was very significant and positive," said 62-year-old Yasuzo Higuchi of Tokyo. "Even now, because of their presence in our country, North Korea can't attack us."
Americans' good will about the Japanese extends to their government, with six in 10 in the U.S. regarding it as trustworthy. But more than half of the Japanese distrust Washington.
Asked whether a first strike with nuclear weapons ever could be justified, a majority in both countries said no. But Americans were twice as likely as the Japanese to think such a strike might be justified in some circumstances.
Since the war, the U.S. military presence in Japan has come to be accepted in most of Japan, but stirs resentment on the island of Okinawa.
The Japanese are evenly split on whether the U.S. troops should stay or go, the polling found. Three-fourths of Americans said this country should keep its military in Japan.
"Any country that will allow us to keep a base there as a forward lookout post, I think we ought to do it," said Wade Hill, a copier technician who lives near Dallas. "We need a buffer zone."
The strongest rivalry between the U.S. and Japan now is economic. The presence of Americans products has increased in Japan, though Tokyo continues to have a large trade surplus with Washington.
Japanese are most likely to name the U.S. as the most important country for their economy, possibly a reflection of the success among Americans for Japanese automobiles and electronics. Americans were most likely to name China as most important for the U.S. economy.
Trade tensions have increased between the United States and China after America ran up a $162 billion deficit with China last year, the largest ever with a single country.
Some see economic competition as the most important battle between countries these days.
"I don't think it will be like World War II," said James DiVita of Sandusky, Ohio, who works in manufacturing. "It will be more of a silent takeover with dollars, buying up companies."
The poll of 1,000 adults in the United States was conducted for the AP by Ipsos, an international polling company, from July 5-10 and the poll of 1,045 eligible voters in Japan was conducted for Kyodo by the Public Opinion Research Center from July 1-3. Each poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
___
Associated Press writers Chisaki Watanabe and Aiko Hayashi in Tokyo, and AP's manager of surveys Trevor Tompson contributed to this report.
On the Net:
An interactive detailing poll questions and responses is available at:
http://wid.ap.org/polls/japanus/index.html
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...rld_war_ii_poll
Gunny
Gold Member
You DO realize you've rattled on for 6 pages without anyone getting a word in edgewise?
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #87
Ok guys I am done.
Once again I apolagize for posting all of that stuff at once. But like I said it won't be happening again. I just needed to get all of this stuff out and it just so happens that this was the quickest way that I could think of.
One time deal though. This is important.
Once again I apolagize for posting all of that stuff at once. But like I said it won't be happening again. I just needed to get all of this stuff out and it just so happens that this was the quickest way that I could think of.
One time deal though. This is important.
Gunny
Gold Member
What it amounts to is you spamming this board with your doomsday agenda.
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #89
It took me over 3 years to research this stuff and I promise that it won't take you that long to read it. =)
Gunny
Gold Member
Here's a prediction for you ..... I doubt ANYONE will read it except those into self-torture.
If you seriously wanted to capture a reader's attention, you would post ONE article and discuss it with whoever. Regardless the topic, when you post so much crap at once you intimidate the reader. It would take them 3 years to respond.
If you seriously wanted to capture a reader's attention, you would post ONE article and discuss it with whoever. Regardless the topic, when you post so much crap at once you intimidate the reader. It would take them 3 years to respond.
- Moderator
- #91
NuclearWinter said:I am going to list a mix of current information and psychic predictions for the World War that is supposed to occur within the next 3 years involving China, Libya, Syria, USA, Russia, and a few others.
All of the psychic sources that I will be using are TRUE psychics who have been tested over time and who have proven themselves time and time again.
I think alot of people will enjoy the information that I will be posting in this thread, but I must warn you, it can be a little scary at first, so brace yourselves for some of the events we have coming ahead.
- The key is not to scare you, but to instead prepare your mind for the changes that we will soon be facing. I am putting this information out there because there is no way that I could keep this all to myself without allowing other people the chance to see whats coming.
WW3 is over. We won it in 1989
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #92
Avatar how can you say that World War 3 was in the 80's? Have you not been watching whats going on in the World with Iran,ect.?
I'm just curious because many people claim the same thing. That Desert Storm was World War 3 or the beginning of it anyways. I disagree though because I think our tensions with Iran and China will spark off World War 3 officially.
I'm just curious because many people claim the same thing. That Desert Storm was World War 3 or the beginning of it anyways. I disagree though because I think our tensions with Iran and China will spark off World War 3 officially.
- Moderator
- #93
NuclearWinter said:I am almost 100% confident that just about everything I am stating here is true. And yes, I will be the first to admit that I was wrong if it turns out that I am. But I do not believe that after all the work and energy I and many others have put into this information that these events will not occur.
And as for my beliefs in our Creator, I never question His/Her prophecies until I have proof that they won't happen. And even then I am more inclinded to chalk it up as "something must have changed it" rather than "Our Creators prophecies were wrong".
I knew a guy who claimed that WW3 would start several years ago. He said that if he was wrong he would stop trying to make prophecies. He was very wrong. Didnt stop him from coming up with something else.
Fact is the man was crazy unfortunately. The guy lost his keys once and was like "What future sign is God trying to show me from me losing my keys". Scared the heck out of a friend of mine.
We don't have to worry about WW3. I think we have more to worry about a civil war at home. but even then i think we are a few years off.
- Moderator
- #94
NuclearWinter said:Avatar how can you say that World War 3 was in the 80's? Have you not been watching whats going on in the World with Iran,ect.?
I'm just curious because many people claim the same thing. That Desert Storm was World War 3 or the beginning of it anyways. I disagree though because I think our tensions with Iran and China will spark off World War 3 officially.
Quite easily. In 1989 we ended our 45 year war with the Soviet Union that was played out through strategic movements throughout the world.
dilloduck
Diamond Member
NuclearWinter said:It took me over 3 years to research this stuff and I promise that it won't take you that long to read it. =)
Could you document your research material for us ? I'm not cancelling my trip to Japan on the advice of someone who has been reading too many comic books.
NuclearWinter said:It took me over 3 years to research this stuff and I promise that it won't take you that long to read it. =)
You wasted your time. There are lots of words that "appear" in the Bible code. Hell, Mother Mary appears on gilled cheese sandwiches. If a seraphim were to appear in my undershorts, would this mean that armageddon would start in my ass? Take your whacked out, LSD induced research elsewhere and stop spamming this board.
BaronVonBigmeat
Senior Member
- Sep 20, 2005
- 1,185
- 163
- 48
NuclearWinter said:And as for my beliefs in our Creator, I never question His/Her prophecies until I have proof that they won't happen. And even then I am more inclinded to chalk it up as "something must have changed it" rather than "Our Creators prophecies were wrong".
Admittedly, I am not a bible scholar. However, I do seem to remember that if a prophet is from God, then his prophecies will come true 100% of the time, and there is nothing anyone can do to change it. If he makes a prophecy which doesn't come to pass--like Jeane Dixon and Nostradamus--then he is a false prophet.
Also, it probably would have been a better idea to condense all this down into a Cliff's Notes 1-post version, and then have a link to wherever you copy/pasted all this stuff from.
insein
Senior Member
Where are they coming from lately? We need a tinfoil hat forum just to sort all of this crap. 
Kagom
Senior Member
Holy hell, man. You're a flippin' jutjob 
NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #100
BaronVonBigmeat said:Admittedly, I am not a bible scholar. However, I do seem to remember that if a prophet is from God, then his prophecies will come true 100% of the time, and there is nothing anyone can do to change it. If he makes a prophecy which doesn't come to pass--like Jeane Dixon and Nostradamus--then he is a false prophet.
Also, it probably would have been a better idea to condense all this down into a Cliff's Notes 1-post version, and then have a link to wherever you copy/pasted all this stuff from.
I respect your opinion.
I take a different viewpoint about times and dates for psychic predictions though.
I believe in psychic ability. I believe that true psychics really can see whats coming in the future. I do not believe that they should slap a date and a time on their predictions however, because time is an illusion, and in reality, it doesn't even exist.
They do not get visions that come stock with a clock watch. Or 99% of the time I am willing to bet that they do not see time in their visions, or anything to do with time at all. In fact, the "awake" psychics (not those like Edgar Cayce), have to look at their visions in retrospect. What are the people wearing in their visions? What do the buildings look like? What do the cars look like? What do they see that could place that vision at a future time frame? It's not easy for them, and much of the time they have to guess at when they are going to happen.
I know they can see visions, and I know they can see things that are coming, the actual outcomes of events if we allow them to occur. And in some cases events that we have no control over.
I do however believe that the information in this thread is correct and is about as accurate as you may find for the next 6 year period starting from this year (2006). For many different reasons, but lets just say that I believe that the next 6 years includes all of these predictions within that time frame.
I am not basing it off of old dates that have worn out. I am basing it off of the Bible Code along with the Mayan Calendar along with just pure visions along with the tribulation period along with my own gut feelings along with a bunch of other things. That is how I figured out the time frame. At least what I believe to be the time frame anyways.
I never go by what a psychic says when they give an exact date for their vision. I just go by their visions, and try to do my best to see the truth in their occurences. It wasn't easy narrowing them down to the next 6 years, it definately took alot of studying and work on my own part, but I really do believe that the final product is correct. And I guess that only "time" will really tell.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 156
- Replies
- 38
- Views
- 431
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 414
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 147
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 74
- Views
- 324
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 27
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8018
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 467
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-