From the files of "What the HELL is wrong with people"

Originally posted by mattskramer
I hope that my comment, not intended to be arrogant and stuck-up, doesn't turn this into another heated debate...just wanted to bring to your attention something you may already know - that there is a distinctive difference between homosexual sex, rape, and statutory rape: one involves consent by each person; one involves consent lacking in at least one person; and one involves consent by a person assumed to be too young to have a full understanding of, or accept responsibility for, the consequences. :scratch:
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
An interesting related court case : Edit vs quote

LOL. Perhaps I just wanted to quote myself. No. To be honest, I confess. I intended to edit my post to correct some grammar. Yet, I selected "quote" instead of "edit". I guess that I'm guilty as charged of....ummm...negligent mutilation of one's own post. Due to my lack of experience, and intense remorsefulness please provide a lite sentence.

:bow2:
 
Originally posted by mattskramer
LOL. Perhaps I just wanted to quote myself. No. To be honest, I confess. I intended to edit my post to correct some grammar. Yet, I selected "quote" instead of "edit". I guess that I'm guilty as charged of....ummm...negligent mutilation of one's own post. Due to my lack of experience, and intense remorsefulness please provide a lite sentence.

:bow2:

Your sentence is that you must never change a hair for me, not if you care for me!
 
Yeah. Really. IS that eight track tape player back there? And That's a kickass fan.
 
LOL - I have a few...very few...grey hairs appearing already. Concerning the interior decor, my wife likes it that way. Sorry.

:)
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
DUde I can read the titles on your porn collection.

I have a couple of old Playboy mags, but not in the room where the pic was shot. You must be seeing something that is not there. No porn movie collection...in that area...either. Better get those eyes checked.

:eek2:
 
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
Its called humor. I know, I don't exhibit it often, but there it is.

:cof:

Poor timed Humor.

You above all others, know me.

You above all others know HOW much this would offend and inflame me.

Thats why I posted.
 
Originally posted by mattskramer
I hope that my comment, not intended to be arrogant and stuck-up, doesn't turn this into another heated debate...just wanted to bring it to your attention something you may already know - that there is a distinctive difference between homosexual sex, rape, and statutory rape: one involves consent by each person; one involves consent lacking in at least one person; and one involves consent by a person assumed to be too young to have a full understanding, or accept responsibility for, the consequences. :scratch:

If a man has sex with a boy, it's homosexual sex. If ANY TWO males, regardless of gender, committ sexual acts 'it's homosexuality'. If the MAN forcing the sex upon the same-sex child did NOT enjoy homosexuality, he wouldn't have done it.

(shrug)....how's that for math?
 
Originally posted by dmp
If a man has sex with a boy, it's homosexual sex. If ANY TWO males, regardless of gender, committ sexual acts 'it's homosexuality'. If the MAN forcing the sex upon the same-sex child did NOT enjoy homosexuality, he wouldn't have done it.

(shrug)....how's that for math?

I don't have an 8-track player.

"If a man has sex with a boy, it's homosexual sex." Is that the limit to your definition. I suppose that if a man has sex with a young little girl, you would simply define it as heterosexual sex. No. It is more than that. If the child is "under-age", by state law, it is statutory rape.
 
Originally posted by mattskramer
I don't have an 8-track player.

"If a man has sex with a boy, it's homosexual sex." Is that the limit to your definition. I suppose that if a man has sex with a young little girl, you would simply define it as heterosexual sex. No. It is more than that. If the child is "under-age", by state law, it is statutory rape.

That's not the point. IF the boy in question was RAPED...or otherwised messed with, by a man, the man is/was a Homosexual.

(shrug). Why is that even up for debate? A homosexual is, as a homosexual DOES.
 
Originally posted by dmp
That's not the point. IF the boy in question was RAPED...or otherwised messed with, by a man, the man is/was a Homosexual.

(shrug). Why is that even up for debate? A homosexual is, as a homosexual DOES.

(Shrug) ... and if a boy in question was RAPED...or otherwise messed with, by a woman, the woman is/was a Heterosexual. Likewise, if a girl in question was RAPED...or otherwise messed with, by a man, the man is/was a Heterosexual. And, finally, if a girl was RAPED...or otherwise messed with by a woman, the woman is/was a Lesbian. Let us be clear that regardless of the sexual orientation (preference) of the individual, sex acts against underaged children or unconsenting adults is Rape. If it is done by a person of the same sex, it is ALSO homosexuality.
 
Originally posted by mattskramer
(Shrug) ... and if a boy in question was RAPED...or otherwise messed with, by a woman, the woman is/was a Heterosexual. Likewise, if a girl in question was RAPED...or otherwise messed with, by a man, the man is/was a Heterosexual. And, finally, if a girl was RAPED...or otherwise messed with by a woman, the woman is/was a Lesbian. Let us be clear that regardless of the sexual orientation (preference) of the individual, sex acts against underaged children or unconsenting adults is Rape. If it is done by a person of the same sex, it is ALSO homosexuality.

I'm glad you two are seeing eye to eye finally.:rolleyes: :D
 
Originally posted by mattskramer
(Shrug) ... and if a boy in question was RAPED...or otherwise messed with, by a woman, the woman is/was a Heterosexual. Likewise, if a girl in question was RAPED...or otherwise messed with, by a man, the man is/was a Heterosexual. And, finally, if a girl was RAPED...or otherwise messed with by a woman, the woman is/was a Lesbian. Let us be clear that regardless of the sexual orientation (preference) of the individual, sex acts against underaged children or unconsenting adults is Rape. If it is done by a person of the same sex, it is ALSO homosexuality.

Right - we are saying Men who committ acts of sex against/with Minors of the SAME sex are Gay. The Gay community however, rejects them (cough-priesthood-cough)...they want ppl to beleive that Homosexuality is fine - okay...no problem.

Homosexuality destroys lives. Heterosexual acts, even committed against/with kids aren't NEARLY so destructive.
 
I have to disagree wiht you when you say that hetero acts arent nearly as destructive. I think that when rape occurs, its destructive. period.
 
Originally posted by KLSuddeth
I have to disagree wiht you when you say that hetero acts arent nearly as destructive. I think that when rape occurs, its destructive. period.

Amen. I think some of you miss the point of this post.
More to the point, I think you belittle rape when you make it about the sexual preference of the predator.

The fact is someone got raped!!!!
Geez...
 
Originally posted by KLSuddeth
I have to disagree wiht you when you say that hetero acts arent nearly as destructive. I think that when rape occurs, its destructive. period.
Absolutely right, KL. Rape is about power - what the fuck difference does it make if the violation occurs by a hetero or a homo sexual?

The only thing I will say is that I doubt there are as many female rapists as male so I guess most rapes upon males occur by other men. But I bet they don't get blamed for wearing high heels, make up or whatever other asinine reason people feel women "deserve" or "asked for it". How's that for degrading?
 

Forum List

Back
Top