From Politico.com

Discussion in 'Politics' started by traveler52, May 28, 2010.

  1. traveler52
    Offline

    traveler52 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Messages:
    639
    Thanks Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    3.5 Miles From The North Tower of The Golden Gate
    Ratings:
    +134
    An alert from:

    Politics, Political News - POLITICO.com.

    The White House used former President William Jefferson Clinton as an intermediary (a go between) to Representation Joe Sestak regarding the possibility of Mr. Sestak taking an uncompensated (unpaid for brain dead and uninformed repuglicant's) position with the Obama Administration.

    Politics, Political News - POLITICO.com.

    Bill Bauer, White House Council confirms that Rom Emanuel (One of the best friends repugs have in the Obama White House) asked former President Clinton as a go between for the White House regarding the Pennsylvania Demoratic Senatorial Primary.

    Vice-Admiral (3-Star) Sestak was open to challenging then DINO Arlen Spector in the Dem. Primary.

    Spector lost. Sestak won.

    The position offered Mr. Sestak was UN-PAID. NO MONEY.

    Sorry Repugs. No money. No Harm....No Foul.
     
  2. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,728
    Thanks Received:
    4,316
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,450
    Well, I'm glad someone as obviously brilliant as yourself has investigated and conlcuded that all is Kosher.

    And by the way genius... it's RAHM..... not Rom.
     
  3. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,542
    Thanks Received:
    8,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,157
    Can you name an unpaid position in the administration?

    And can you honestly claim that such a position has no value just because it's unpaid?

    Amazing that Bill is willing to fall on the sword like this. Wonder what he got in return.
     
  4. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,728
    Thanks Received:
    4,316
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,450
    What a douche.
     
  5. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,728
    Thanks Received:
    4,316
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,450
    Well, we know everything is above board if a Clinton is involved.
     
  6. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,542
    Thanks Received:
    8,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,157
    Yeah. It's not like he's ever lied under oath or obstructed justice before.
     
  7. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,146
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,700
    Despwate Dems, Dew DUmb Down.
     
  8. JimH52
    Offline

    JimH52 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,240
    Thanks Received:
    3,094
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    US
    Ratings:
    +8,214
    I am sure the repubs will try to make a big deal out of this. But they wil have to ask the Tea Party for permission first!
     
  9. boedicca
    Offline

    boedicca Uppity Water Nymph Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    41,789
    Thanks Received:
    12,771
    Trophy Points:
    2,250
    Location:
    The Land of Funk
    Ratings:
    +22,761
    The morandum:

    MEMORANDUM FROM ROBERT F. BAUER, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL

    SUBJECT: Review of Discussions Relating to Congressman Sestak Recent press reports have reflected questions and speculation about discussions between White House staff and Congressman Joe Sestak in relation to his plans to run for the United States Senate. Our office has reviewed those discussions and claims made about them, focusing in particular on the suggestion that government positions may have been improperly offered to the Congressman to dissuade him from pursuing a Senate candidacy.

    We have concluded that allegations of improper conduct rest on factual errors and lack a basis in the law.

    Secretary of the Navy. It has been suggested that the Administration may have offered Congressman Sestak the position of Secretary of the Navy in the hope that he would accept the offer and abandon a Senate candidacy. This is false. The President announced his intent to nominate Ray Mabus to be Secretary of the Navy on March 26,2009, over a month before Senator Specter announced that he was becoming a member of the Democratic Party in late April. Mabus was confirmed in May. At no time was Congressman Sestak offered, nor did he seek, the position of Secretary of the Navy.

    Uncompensated Advisory Board Options. We found that, as the Congressman has publicly and accurately stated, options for Executive Branch service were raised with him. Efforts were made in June and July of 2009 to determine whether Congressman Sestak would be interested in service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board, which would avoid a divisive Senate primary, allow him to retain his seat in the House, and provide him with an opportunity for additional service to the public in a high-level advisory capacity for which he was highly qualified. The advisory positions discussed with Congressman Sestak, while important to the work of the Administration, would have been uncompensated.

    White House staff did not discuss these options with Congressman Sestak. The White House Chief of Staff enlisted the support of former President Clinton who agreed to raise with Congressman Sestak options of service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board. Congressman Sestak declined the suggested alternatives, remaining committed to his Senate candidacy.

    Relationship to Senate Campaign. It has been suggested that discussions of alternatives to the Senate campaign were improperly raised with the Congressman. There was no such impropriety. The Democratic Party leadership had a legitimate interest in averting a divisive primary fight and a similarly legitimate concern about the Congressman vacating his seat in the House. By virtue of his career in public service, including distinguished military service, Congressman Sestak was viewed to be highly qualified to hold a range of advisory positions in which he could, while holding his House seat, have additional responsibilities of considerable potential interest to him and value to the Executive Branch.

    There have been numerous, reported instances in the past when prior Administrations -- both Democratic and Republican, and motivated by the same goals -- discussed alternative paths to service for qualified individuals also considering campaigns for public office. Such discussions are fully consistent with the relevant law and ethical requirements.


    Memorandum from White House Counsel Regarding the Review of Discussions Relating to Congressman Sestak | The White House


    I'm filing this with the Al Gore "no controlling legal authority" defense.
     
  10. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,146
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,700
    anybody here still believe a word that comes out of this administration? go throw yourself under da bus. :lol::lol::lol:
     

Share This Page