From FamousPlagiarists.com

Ninja

Senior Member
Dec 30, 2006
2,220
381
48
Glorious People's Republic of California
Joe Biden’s history of plagiarism and “stressless scholarship” gave plenty of ammo to his enemies, one of them choosing to circulate a so-called “attack video” to demonstrate Biden’s outright plagiarism of a British politician’s speech. But this appropriation from Neal Kinnock was not the first occurrence of unacknowledged lifting by the senator from Delaware.

In 1965 Biden plagiarized while writing a paper as a student at the Syracuse University Law School in a legal methods course which he failed because of that copied paper. Such “stressless scholarship” as it is euphemistically called has become all too common in the modern Internet era with countless cheatsites and “research services” offering to sell students papers on topics from A to Z.

Biden’s case demonstrates that student plagiarism is nothing new. Only the methods of cheating have changed. Today, cheating has gone digital with the proliferation of Internet based paper filing and distributions systems, but the principles—or lack thereof—are the same. And as the Biden case illustrates, getting caught for such academic dishonesty may have serious ramifications for one’s political career. Joe Biden’s failed bid for the Democratic ticket is a case in point.

“Stressless scholarship” may seem like a pretty good idea at the time that many students make that decision to ‘crib’, copy, or dowload a paper off the Internet, but in Biden’s case the plagiarism of his student days came back to haunt his bid for the democratic presidential nomination like a spectre from his past.

In an article entitled “Biden’s Belly Flop”, Newsweek printed Joe Biden’s yearbook picture from his college days and a copy of his law school transcripts with the big “F” in his transcripts circled. Biden was given a chance to repeat his legal methods course, and above the “F” his retake grade of 80% was eventually penciled in. Being a repeat offender when it came to plagiarism made things much, much worse for Biden than they might have been otherwise in his failed bid for the Democratic presidential ticket in 1987.

Senator Biden’s plagiarism of a speech by British Labor Party leader Neal Kinnock took place at a campaign stump at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. In closing his speech, Biden took Kinnock’s ideas and language as if they were his very own inspired thoughts, prefacing Kinnock’s ideas with the phrase “I started thinking as I was coming over here . . . “. Little did Biden suspect that video footage of this speech would be spliced together with footage of Kinnock’s speech in an “attack video” which would be distributed by members of the Dukakis campaign.

Making the headline news in the New York Times, and the evening news on TV, the video was a stab in the back for Biden by his democratic competitor, and although he insisted that “I’m in this race to stay. I’m in this race to win,” the resulting publicity surrounding his unacknowledged use of Neal Kinnock’s speech was what eventually forced him out of the race. Name recognition was no longer a problem for Biden, but not the kind of name recognition which would assist his campaign for the democratic presidential nomination. His name was now a byword for plagiarism. His situation became a classic example of plagiarism for high school teachers and college instructors across the nation lecturing on the evils of unacknowledged source use.

Biden initially denied any wrongdoing, claiming that this was just an inadvertent lack of acknowledgement. Yet there were other instances of rhetorical borrowing from speeches made by Robert F. Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey. And the fact that Biden had given other speeches using the Kinnock passages without acknowledgment suggested that the lifting was more than just an inadvertent oversight.

As with Al Gore’s case, the perception existed in the public mind that Biden just wasn’t the real thing. He wasn’t authentic, didn’t have thoughts and ideas of his own, and was a malleable piece of clay being molded by his handlers to suit the political whims and fancies which they thought would appeal to voters. A Time magazine article by Walter Shapairo was pretty much on the money in offering the speculation that “In the end, Biden may be remembered as the candidate who truly offered the voters an echo and not a choice.”

William Safire, former speechwriter for Richard Nixon, gloated in the New York Times over Biden’s demise, quoting a supposedly “embittered Democrat” who said, “I’m going back to Gary Hart . . . At least he didn’t steal that girl from some far-lefty in England.” And he concluded his op-ed column with a swipe at Biden’s ability to think apart from his speechwriter: “So my advice to candidates like Joe Biden is this: Do justly, love perorations and walk humbly with thy speechwriter. (I forget where I got that, but it has a nice ring to it.) ”

With all the press he was receiving over his Neal Kinnock plagiarism courtesy of the Dukakis “attack videos”, Biden was quickly becoming the “most famous political plagiarist of our time”, as Thomas Mallon describes the unfortunate Delaware senator. It was just a matter of time before Biden would have to bow out of the democratic primary.

Biden himself thought that all the attention to his rhetorical borrowing was “frankly ludicrous”, and the media analysts generally agreed, stating that is was “hardly a capital offense”, but as William Safire put it, “times have changed; you can’t get away with borrowing anything these days – not even an oratorical technique, much less a phrase or paragraph – unless you are willing to give the attribution.” If Gore’s loss of the presidency to George W. Bush in 2000 was more indirectly related to plagiarism, it is evident that Biden’s case is without question a direct result of his unacknowledged use of Kinnock’s speech as if it were his very own. This instance of plagiarism and the public exposure it received cut short the presidential aspirations of an otherwise gifted orator and statesman.


Famous Plagiarists.com © WarOnPlagiarism.org-- Political Profiles

98g76563hutnmjto5.jpg
 
I don't think the plagarism angle is going to be a very effective way to attack Biden ... the news is too old ... taking advantage of gaffs is where he will be vulnerable ...

That said ...

Dude's great on the stump ... comfortable in attack mode ... highly energetic and passionate ... and will likely beat whomever McCain picks in the debate ... good pick ... now if they could only flip the ticket you would have a surefire winner.
 
I don't think the plagarism angle is going to be a very effective way to attack Biden ... the news is too old ... taking advantage of gaffs is where he will be vulnerable ...

That said ...

Dude's great on the stump ... comfortable in attack mode ... highly energetic and passionate ... and will likely beat whomever McCain picks in the debate ... good pick ... now if they could only flip the ticket you would have a surefire winner.
i gotta disagree with you on that one

Biden comes off as a fool to many
then there is his mouth, he's made some HUGE blunders
 
I disagree. He got 1% is Iowa for a reason.

Webb or Richardson would have made for unbeatable tickets. Being as impartial as I can - Biden doesn't.
Webb, too new, has less experience in the senate than Obama
now Richardson, THAT would have been a hard pick to beat
sucessful southwest Governor, hispanic that would have put a lot of southwestern states in play


i think Obama screwed up big time by not picking him
 
I disagree. He got 1% is Iowa for a reason.

Webb or Richardson would have made for unbeatable tickets. Being as impartial as I can - Biden doesn't.

There wasn't any oxygen left in Iowa ... to me, his bid was more of a token bid than anything.

I agree that Webb would have been a better choice and who I was pulling for ... Biden would be a better fit as SecState ... Richardson, though I liked the guy came off horribly in the primaries ... he was flubbering in every debate ... that would have been a liability ... Biden's quicker on his feet, more of a firecracker ... more fit for a soundbite campaign.
 
Webb, too new, has less experience in the senate than Obama
now Richardson, THAT would have been a hard pick to beat
sucessful southwest Governor, hispanic that would have put a lot of southwestern states in play


i think Obama screwed up big time by not picking him

Plus an A rating from the NRA.

Heck, I like Richardson so much I'd have considered voting for that ticket.
 
Webb, too new, has less experience in the senate than Obama
now Richardson, THAT would have been a hard pick to beat
sucessful southwest Governor, hispanic that would have put a lot of southwestern states in play


i think Obama screwed up big time by not picking him

If Obama is going to win, he needs a high octane campaign ... a lotta energy and motivation ... Richardson just didn't project that.
 
Webb, too new, has less experience in the senate than Obama
now Richardson, THAT would have been a hard pick to beat
sucessful southwest Governor, hispanic that would have put a lot of southwestern states in play


i think Obama screwed up big time by not picking him


I don't disagree with your thoughts on Richardson but I do wonder if it was not up to Obama. Remember the whole VP rollout was really funky for Obama as he gave himself a deadline he could not meet and made his "choice" in the middle of the night. (perhaps it was just a failed fund raising ploy?) My point being, maybe his first, second or more choice of VP simply said no.

It's an offbeat thought for sure but it was definitely an offbeat selection process with a bizarre ending.
 
I wouldn't be at all if surprised if the motivation behind this pick came from the non stop attacks aimed at Obama ... the campaign sensing that if they didn't pick someone not named Hillary who could get in the dirt and fight then they might end up suffocated ... and there was Biden ... I dunno ... just thinking out loud now.
 
I think Richardson got an A and Duncan Hunter got an A+. Could be wrong. But Bill - and many other Democrats - are much more trustworthy on the 2A than many Republicans... Such as Rudy Giuliani.

You are prolly right ... I'm liberal on some things but with guns I side with the right ... and poor Duncan Hunter ... Dive will be the first to tell you how he feels about the campaign he ran ... and Rudy ... blech ... that dude ... and I mean this in the nicest way possible ... was a completely shameless political whore.
 
The Democratic skeleton in Biden's closet, is his role in the change of the bankruptsy laws.

All in all the man's a good Dem, but that act was about as anti-working class as you can get.

He was well rewarded for it by MBNA, though.
 

you mean like a 40 year old rich useless jerk who drives drunk? or his wife who runs over her boyfriend because SHE was drinking?

or the guy who cheats on his wife and dumps her to marry the young rich chick?

or perhaps we should talk about the Keating scandal?

you really want to talk about this stuff?

because, of course, there are no REAL issues to discuss....
 
you mean like a 40 year old rich useless jerk who drives drunk? or his wife who runs over her boyfriend because SHE was drinking?

or the guy who cheats on his wife and dumps her to marry the young rich chick?

or perhaps we should talk about the Keating scandal?

you really want to talk about this stuff?

because, of course, there are no REAL issues to discuss....

spinning_top.JPG
 
you mean like a 40 year old rich useless jerk who drives drunk? or his wife who runs over her boyfriend because SHE was drinking?
or the guy who cheats on his wife and dumps her to marry the young rich chick?

or perhaps we should talk about the Keating scandal?

you really want to talk about this stuff?

because, of course, there are no REAL issues to discuss....

and i'm sure you have some PROOF of that

i wont hold my breath waiting for it
:cuckoo:
 
and i'm sure you have some PROOF of that

i wont hold my breath waiting for it
:cuckoo:

what kind of silliness is it to demand proof of commonly known facts? it's like asking for "proof" that bill clinton had a thing with monica lewinsky.

you guys make yourselves look really silly with that kind of thing. not to mention, the absolute waste of bandwidth your comments end up being.
 

Forum List

Back
Top