Frightening

[P@triot]

"Obama Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood hailed China as a model for government efficiency this week, saying: "The Chinese are more successful [in building infrastructure] because in their country, only three people make the decision. In our country, 3,000 people do, 3 million."

The left has become so radical, it is down right crazy. They bash freedom, choice, and America while praising Communism, oppression, and dictators. Can you imagine just 20 years ago a member of any presidents cabinet stating that China is so much better because just a few dictators make all the decisions, while America sucks because we have discussions and debate on what is best?

This party has become so radical and so unhinged. Thankfully, because of that, their numbers are shrinking every year (down to a laughable 21% of American's who are registered Democrats). If not for that, these maniacs would be a serious threat to the globe.
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/06/morning-bell-jobs-unemployment-stuck/
all quotes require a link per board copyright rules. kindly insert your link or quote will be removed.

 

[Jackson]

"Obama Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood hailed China as a model for government efficiency this week, saying: "The Chinese are more successful [in building infrastructure] because in their country, only three people make the decision. In our country, 3,000 people do, 3 million."

The left has become so radical, it is down right crazy. They bash freedom, choice, and America while praising Communism, oppression, and dictators. Can you imagine just 20 years ago a member of any presidents cabinet stating that China is so much better because just a few dictators make all the decisions, while America sucks because we have discussions and debate on what is best?

This party has become so radical and so unhinged. Thankfully, because of that, their numbers are shrinking every year (down to a laughable 21% of American's who are registered Democrats). If not for that, these maniacs would be a serious threat to the globe.

Yeds, this is a perfect example of Obama's selections for people in office and it is downright scary. If it isn't Van Johnson , it's it's his economic team who have all left the scene or those who don't even pay their taxes but head the Treasury Dept. Just a shakin' my head.

 

[tererun]

Actually, it would be much more efficient to have a couple of people make a decision than to have congress argue about it incessantly. This is not saying the decisions are always good, but that they are more efficient. I know that is an advanced point that your feeble little mind could not possibly contemplate so you fall back on the idea that anyone who says something about china that is not an insult must automatically be a communist idiot, but in this case it is merely a fact that to get 3 people to agree and start moving is a hell of a lot easier to get a few hundred to agree and move forward. There is a saying that too many chiefs fuck things up, and it is pretty well established that this is a fact.

 

[tererun]

Oh and just to add a little more insult to your completely pathetic point, the reason the president is given the power to command the military and not congress is because in a war you need quick efficient decisions and this requires a single leader. It is clear that the US government, its creators, and most people recognize that there is efficiency and purpose in having some decisions made by a singular or very small group of representatives.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Anybody have a link to this that isn't a blog?

 

[Stukaman]

"Obama Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood hailed China as a model for government efficiency this week, saying: "The Chinese are more successful [in building infrastructure] because in their country, only three people make the decision. In our country, 3,000 people do, 3 million."

The left has become so radical, it is down right crazy. They bash freedom, choice, and America while praising Communism, oppression, and dictators. Can you imagine just 20 years ago a member of any presidents cabinet stating that China is so much better because just a few dictators make all the decisions, while America sucks because we have discussions and debate on what is best?

This party has become so radical and so unhinged. Thankfully, because of that, their numbers are shrinking every year (down to a laughable 21% of American's who are registered Democrats). If not for that, these maniacs would be a serious threat to the globe.

Yeds, this is a perfect example of Obama's selections for people in office and it is downright scary. If it isn't Van Johnson , it's it's his economic team who have all left the scene or those who don't even pay their taxes but head the Treasury Dept. Just a shakin' my head.

--------- Please don't forget his wonderful AG, Eric Holder who was cited for Contempt! And the IDIOT George Bush, who had brilliant people like Condolessa Rice as his Sec of State and Richard Gates as Sec. of Defence. Given the comparrison, who is the real idiot here?

 

[The T]

Actually, it would be much more efficient to have a couple of people make a decision than to have congress argue about it incessantly. This is not saying the decisions are always good, but that they are more efficient. I know that is an advanced point that your feeble little mind could not possibly contemplate so you fall back on the idea that anyone who says something about china that is not an insult must automatically be a communist idiot, but in this case it is merely a fact that to get 3 people to agree and start moving is a hell of a lot easier to get a few hundred to agree and move forward. There is a saying that too many chiefs fuck things up, and it is pretty well established that this is a fact.

Congress incessantly ARGUING about something? Really Gracie? Seems to me that they are forced into DEBATE...as they SHOULD be doing as the Representatives of the PEOPLE.

Balance of POWER and not rubberstamping LAW, and GRIDLOCK is rather REFRESHING...don't you think Pink Pony Moron?

 

[Vast LWC]

Actually, it would be much more efficient to have a couple of people make a decision than to have congress argue about it incessantly. This is not saying the decisions are always good, but that they are more efficient. I know that is an advanced point that your feeble little mind could not possibly contemplate so you fall back on the idea that anyone who says something about china that is not an insult must automatically be a communist idiot, but in this case it is merely a fact that to get 3 people to agree and start moving is a hell of a lot easier to get a few hundred to agree and move forward. There is a saying that too many chiefs fuck things up, and it is pretty well established that this is a fact.

To some people, the world can only be interpreted by 10-word-or-less talking points.

I guess that's why tweeting is so popular.

So sad.

 

[Darkwind]

Actually, it would be much more efficient to have a couple of people make a decision than to have congress argue about it incessantly. This is not saying the decisions are always good, but that they are more efficient. I know that is an advanced point that your feeble little mind could not possibly contemplate so you fall back on the idea that anyone who says something about china that is not an insult must automatically be a communist idiot, but in this case it is merely a fact that to get 3 people to agree and start moving is a hell of a lot easier to get a few hundred to agree and move forward. There is a saying that too many chiefs fuck things up, and it is pretty well established that this is a fact.

You actually have the gall to call others feeble minded?

Let Me see if you can guess why your idea of efficiency is so asinine as to be frightening.

What happens when the three in power have to be replaced? Put yourself in this place.

It would be much more efficient for three conservatives to make all the choices for this country. We'd be on track in almost no time at all.

Still feeling good about it?

 

[Vast LWC]

Congress incessantly ARGUING about something? Really Gracie/ Seems to me that they are forced into DEBATE...as they SHOULD be doing as the Representatives of the PEOPLE.

Balance of POWER and not rubberstamping LAW, and GRIDLOCK is rather REFRESHING...don't you think Pink Pony Moron?

Which makes it less efficient.

More efficient doesn't mean better.

The Nazis, for instance, were one of the most efficient societies in history.

That certainly doesn't mean their form of government was better.

 

[Darkwind]

One other thing.

Simply because a group of people make the decisions, does not mean that they cannot be efficient. After 9/11, how long did it take Congress to come together and act?

 

[The T]

"Obama Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood hailed China as a model for government efficiency this week, saying: "The Chinese are more successful [in building infrastructure] because in their country, only three people make the decision. In our country, 3,000 people do, 3 million."

The left has become so radical, it is down right crazy. They bash freedom, choice, and America while praising Communism, oppression, and dictators. Can you imagine just 20 years ago a member of any presidents cabinet stating that China is so much better because just a few dictators make all the decisions, while America sucks because we have discussions and debate on what is best?

This party has become so radical and so unhinged. Thankfully, because of that, their numbers are shrinking every year (down to a laughable 21% of American's who are registered Democrats). If not for that, these maniacs would be a serious threat to the globe.

Yeds, this is a perfect example of Obama's selections for people in office and it is downright scary. If it isn't Van Johnson , it's it's his economic team who have all left the scene or those who don't even pay their taxes but head the Treasury Dept. Just a shakin' my head.

Watermelon Van Jones is an idiot but Gone out of the list of Czars.

 

[Vast LWC]

Actually, it would be much more efficient to have a couple of people make a decision than to have congress argue about it incessantly. This is not saying the decisions are always good, but that they are more efficient. I know that is an advanced point that your feeble little mind could not possibly contemplate so you fall back on the idea that anyone who says something about china that is not an insult must automatically be a communist idiot, but in this case it is merely a fact that to get 3 people to agree and start moving is a hell of a lot easier to get a few hundred to agree and move forward. There is a saying that too many chiefs fuck things up, and it is pretty well established that this is a fact.

You actually have the gall to call others feeble minded?

Let Me see if you can guess why your idea of efficiency is so asinine as to be frightening.

What happens when the three in power have to be replaced? Put yourself in this place.

It would be much more efficient for three conservatives to make all the choices for this country. We'd be on track in almost no time at all.

Still feeling good about it?

I believe you are actually agreeing with the poster you are responding to. You do realize that, right?

They're saying that the fact he said it was more effiecient does not mean he supports a China-like system...

 

[freedombecki]

Here's a link to: Secretary of Transportation LaHood's speech.

Yes, that wasn't the most brilliant thing in the world to say by a Democrat whose party is under a lot of attack lately for being Marxist/Communist by those who disparage the Communistic approach to holding human beings back from developing their full potential. A lot of people over there are angry at Americans for being prosperous, while their system of government disallows prosperity in favor of mugging people out of their money by legislative bodies. Seems we're knocking on the door of that, sometimes.

 

[Vast LWC]

One other thing.

Simply because a group of people make the decisions, does not mean that they cannot be efficient. After 9/11, how long did it take Congress to come together and act?

After 9/11, Congress gave vast amounts of power to one person, in the hopes that the country could efficiently act against Al Qaeda....

 

[Moonglow]

"Obama Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood hailed China as a model for government efficiency this week, saying: "The Chinese are more successful [in building infrastructure] because in their country, only three people make the decision. In our country, 3,000 people do, 3 million."

The left has become so radical, it is down right crazy. They bash freedom, choice, and America while praising Communism, oppression, and dictators. Can you imagine just 20 years ago a member of any presidents cabinet stating that China is so much better because just a few dictators make all the decisions, while America sucks because we have discussions and debate on what is best?

This party has become so radical and so unhinged. Thankfully, because of that, their numbers are shrinking every year (down to a laughable 21% of American's who are registered Democrats). If not for that, these maniacs would be a serious threat to the globe.

Sorry, but China is not a communistic country, they have reformed into a capitalistic socialist nation. But you must remember that politics and military are over loaded with hollow accolades.

 

[freedombecki]

Actually, it would be much more efficient to have a couple of people make a decision than to have congress argue about it incessantly. This is not saying the decisions are always good, but that they are more efficient. I know that is an advanced point that your feeble little mind could not possibly contemplate so you fall back on the idea that anyone who says something about china that is not an insult must automatically be a communist idiot, but in this case it is merely a fact that to get 3 people to agree and start moving is a hell of a lot easier to get a few hundred to agree and move forward. There is a saying that too many chiefs fuck things up, and it is pretty well established that this is a fact.

Actually, tererun, King George thought it most efficient not to allow any Colonial American to represent American issues in his court.

FAIL!!!

 

[Vast LWC]

Here's a link to: Secretary of Transportation LaHood's speech.

Yes, that wasn't the most brilliant thing in the world to say by a Democrat whose party is under a lot of attack lately for being Marxist/Communist by those who disparage the Communistic approach to holding human beings back from developing their full potential. A lot of people over there are angry at Americans for being prosperous, while their system of government disallows prosperity in favor of mugging people out of their money by legislative bodies. Seems we're knocking on the door of that, sometimes.

From your link:

LaHood said that, despite this, democracy is still preferable. "We have the best system of government anywhere on the planet. It is the best. Because the people have their say," he said.

 

[freedombecki]

"Obama Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood hailed China as a model for government efficiency this week, saying: "The Chinese are more successful [in building infrastructure] because in their country, only three people make the decision. In our country, 3,000 people do, 3 million."

The left has become so radical, it is down right crazy. They bash freedom, choice, and America while praising Communism, oppression, and dictators. Can you imagine just 20 years ago a member of any presidents cabinet stating that China is so much better because just a few dictators make all the decisions, while America sucks because we have discussions and debate on what is best?

This party has become so radical and so unhinged. Thankfully, because of that, their numbers are shrinking every year (down to a laughable 21% of American's who are registered Democrats). If not for that, these maniacs would be a serious threat to the globe.

Sorry, but China is not a communistic country, they have reformed into a capitalistic socialist nation. But you must remember that politics and military are over loaded with hollow accolades.

Holy shades of Tienanmen Square! You don't say!

 

[freedombecki]

Here's a link to: Secretary of Transportation LaHood's speech.

Yes, that wasn't the most brilliant thing in the world to say by a Democrat whose party is under a lot of attack lately for being Marxist/Communist by those who disparage the Communistic approach to holding human beings back from developing their full potential. A lot of people over there are angry at Americans for being prosperous, while their system of government disallows prosperity in favor of mugging people out of their money by legislative bodies. Seems we're knocking on the door of that, sometimes.

From your link:

LaHood said that, despite this, democracy is still preferable. "We have the best system of government anywhere on the planet. It is the best. Because the people have their say," he said.

Mouthing contradictory words that make oligarchical dealings sound acceptable doesn't change the unacceptable proposition. Frankly, it's an indefensible proposition, and you can't put lipstick on that pig, dear.