Freeligion

[RWS]

But now, I'm into Howlerism!

Hi five!

This is gonna be great... I just need some time to think of great things and how to make it holler. I'm welcome to ideas!!!

 

[ding]

Ding intentionally denies examination because ding is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of ding. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. ding assumes superiority through birthright and gender. ding has an extraordinary ability to be incited and inflamed by social movements. Ding dismisses his defeats and ignores his incongruities. Ding desires a society where he can continue to be the dominatinig bully he wants to be. Ding is a religion. The religious nature of ding explains his hostility towards non-believers, which makes him believe they are inherently evil. Ding's dogma is based on worshipping stuff he was born into, and has no idea of the origins of his religion. Ding sees no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Ding practices moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, genocidal behavior, cultural hatred and intolerance of deviance. Ding worships science but is the first to reject it when it suits his purpose. Ding can be identified by a need to take control and profess his religion. His religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of other religions and equality via submission and death. Ding practices critical theory which is the Christian belief that he doesn't have to examine anything outside of his scripture. Ding confuses critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something he never does.

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.

Thank you, oh unoriginal one.

 

[ding]

Ding intentionally denies examination because ding is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of ding. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. ding assumes superiority through birthright and gender. ding has an extraordinary ability to be incited and inflamed by social movements. Ding dismisses his defeats and ignores his incongruities. Ding desires a society where he can continue to be the dominatinig bully he wants to be. Ding is a religion. The religious nature of ding explains his hostility towards non-believers, which makes him believe they are inherently evil. Ding's dogma is based on worshipping stuff he was born into, and has no idea of the origins of his religion. Ding sees no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Ding practices moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, genocidal behavior, cultural hatred and intolerance of deviance. Ding worships science but is the first to reject it when it suits his purpose. Ding can be identified by a need to take control and profess his religion. His religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of other religions and equality via submission and death. Ding practices critical theory which is the Christian belief that he doesn't have to examine anything outside of his scripture. Ding confuses critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something he never does.

He once let it slip out that he was raised catholic, fell way from the faith, only to return to it like a dog returns to its vomit.

Now he's a genuine rededicated triune mangod eating holy man babbling his way into a fools paradise.

You just better hope we don't revive the Crusades, Moohammered.

 

[ding]

 

[RWS]

Ding intentionally denies examination because ding is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of ding. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. ding assumes superiority through birthright and gender. ding has an extraordinary ability to be incited and inflamed by social movements. Ding dismisses his defeats and ignores his incongruities. Ding desires a society where he can continue to be the dominatinig bully he wants to be. Ding is a religion. The religious nature of ding explains his hostility towards non-believers, which makes him believe they are inherently evil. Ding's dogma is based on worshipping stuff he was born into, and has no idea of the origins of his religion. Ding sees no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Ding practices moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, genocidal behavior, cultural hatred and intolerance of deviance. Ding worships science but is the first to reject it when it suits his purpose. Ding can be identified by a need to take control and profess his religion. His religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of other religions and equality via submission and death. Ding practices critical theory which is the Christian belief that he doesn't have to examine anything outside of his scripture. Ding confuses critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something he never does.

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.

Thank you, oh unoriginal one.

Well, it's obviously a prepared post, where you can just replace names as necessary. At least I changed it a bit to suit you, besides names. But the stuff I didn't change, is spot on...

And since you have a history of plagiarism with me already, I figured you wouldn't mind.

 

[RWS]

So I need ideas for the new religion of Howlerism!

I'm not going to be doing this myself, since that's what we're trying to avoid....

So I ask, what are good ideas and principles that we want to put forward in our new religion? To help humanity, and help the planet.

And we have to follow the ways of the howler monkey somewhat in our basic tenets. I'll be thinking about it, but welcome all your ideas!

 

[RWS]

And fyi, this new religion will come with at least 12 holidays per year. Jus sayin...

 

[ding]

Ding intentionally denies examination because ding is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of ding. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. ding assumes superiority through birthright and gender. ding has an extraordinary ability to be incited and inflamed by social movements. Ding dismisses his defeats and ignores his incongruities. Ding desires a society where he can continue to be the dominatinig bully he wants to be. Ding is a religion. The religious nature of ding explains his hostility towards non-believers, which makes him believe they are inherently evil. Ding's dogma is based on worshipping stuff he was born into, and has no idea of the origins of his religion. Ding sees no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Ding practices moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, genocidal behavior, cultural hatred and intolerance of deviance. Ding worships science but is the first to reject it when it suits his purpose. Ding can be identified by a need to take control and profess his religion. His religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of other religions and equality via submission and death. Ding practices critical theory which is the Christian belief that he doesn't have to examine anything outside of his scripture. Ding confuses critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something he never does.

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.

Thank you, oh unoriginal one.

Well, it's obviously a prepared post, where you can just replace names as necessary. At least I changed it a bit to suit you, besides names. But the stuff I didn't change, is spot on...

And since you have a history of plagiarism with me already, I figured you wouldn't mind.

More like a position paper on liberalism, atheism, socialism and communism. You guys all meld into one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

RWS intentionally denies examination because RWS is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of RWS. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. RWS seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership. RWS has an extraordinary ability to be incited and inflamed by social movements. RWS dismisses his defeats and ignores his incongruities. RWS desires big government and uses big government to implement his morally relativistic social policies. RWS is a religion. The religious nature of RWS explains his hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. RWS' dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. RWS sees no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. RWS practices moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. RWS worships science but is the first to reject it when it suits his purpose. RWS can be identified by an external locus of control. His religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. RWS practices critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what he does not believe to arrive at what he does believe without ever having to examine what he believes. RWS confuses critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something he never does.

I notice you use that copy/paste a lot. Do you think anyone ever actually reads it?

Have YOU ever read it all?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.

Sometimes, imitation is the sincerest form of mockery.

 

[ding]

RWS intentionally denies examination because RWS is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of RWS. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. RWS seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership. RWS has an extraordinary ability to be incited and inflamed by social movements. RWS dismisses his defeats and ignores his incongruities. RWS desires big government and uses big government to implement his morally relativistic social policies. RWS is a religion. The religious nature of RWS explains his hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. RWS' dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. RWS sees no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. RWS practices moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. RWS worships science but is the first to reject it when it suits his purpose. RWS can be identified by an external locus of control. His religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. RWS practices critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what he does not believe to arrive at what he does believe without ever having to examine what he believes. RWS confuses critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something he never does.

I notice you use that copy/paste a lot. Do you think anyone ever actually reads it?

Have YOU ever read it all?

Does it bother you that the founding fathers believed that liberty and freedom are dependent upon religion and morality?

 

[ding]

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.

Sometimes, imitation is the sincerest form of mockery.

Often times ignorance is insolent. This is especially true for ignorance that thinks it knows.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Does it bother you that the founding fathers believed that liberty and freedom are dependent upon religion and morality?

No, it wouldn't not bother me in the least if all the founder fathers had said or believed that... of course, they didn't, but whatever...

 

[ding]

Does it bother you that the founding fathers believed that liberty and freedom are dependent upon religion and morality?

No, it wouldn't not bother me in the least if all the founder fathers had said or believed that... of course, they didn't, but whatever...

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Does it bother you that the founding fathers believed that liberty and freedom are dependent upon religion and morality?

No, it wouldn't not bother me in the least if all the founder fathers had said or believed that... of course, they didn't, but whatever...

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

Good for him! I don't agree, but good for him!

 

[ding]

Does it bother you that the founding fathers believed that liberty and freedom are dependent upon religion and morality?

No, it wouldn't not bother me in the least if all the founder fathers had said or believed that... of course, they didn't, but whatever...

". . . Virtue, morality, and religion. This is the armor, my friend, and this alone that renders us invincible. These are the tactics we should study. If we lose these, we are conquered, fallen indeed . . . so long as our manners and principles remain sound, there is no danger."
Patrick Henry

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Again... good for him!

 

[ding]

Does it bother you that the founding fathers believed that liberty and freedom are dependent upon religion and morality?

No, it wouldn't not bother me in the least if all the founder fathers had said or believed that... of course, they didn't, but whatever...

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

Good for him! I don't agree, but good for him!

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
John Adams

 

[ding]

Again... good for him!

"It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue."
John Adams

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is your point, ding? Any 6 year old can do what you are doing right now.