Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #121
At this point the mechanism for ending the abridging of the purpose of probably is appropriate to introduce.
The obvious thing to do is revise the First Amendment to define that speech which tend to enable the peoples unity for the purpose of altering or abolishing government destructive to their unalienable rights. That speech is not only protected as all speech is, it is empowered or enabled by government.
We already see this in defacto forms with PBS and NPR as well as public access TV. Those entities have all become big business and the bigger they are the more elite, while the smaller simply do not have adequate reach or influence.
So this draft is written in the classic interpretational context that the existing First Amendment has, but this enables and compels states to assure vital information held by the public is shared and understood widely.
REV. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Congress shall see that nothing abridges the freedom of speech and the primary methods or systems of it shall not be abridged and be first accessible for the purpose of the unity of the people in order to alter or abolish government destructive to their unalienable rights, or with its possible greater meaning through understanding one another in; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Congress shall see that nothing abridges freedom of the press in its service to the unity of the people; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances or defense of this constitution.
People of states would submit petition with a mandatory number of signatures regarding the production of an order to the largest corporate media of the state compelling the production of documentary or other appropriate form sharing the information by the corporation using state corporate licensure as leverage to compliance.
The petition would show that the information was vital to the continuity of constitution principles, that the public generally does not currently know the information and that the information was not easily available by product of promotion.
The obvious thing to do is revise the First Amendment to define that speech which tend to enable the peoples unity for the purpose of altering or abolishing government destructive to their unalienable rights. That speech is not only protected as all speech is, it is empowered or enabled by government.
We already see this in defacto forms with PBS and NPR as well as public access TV. Those entities have all become big business and the bigger they are the more elite, while the smaller simply do not have adequate reach or influence.
So this draft is written in the classic interpretational context that the existing First Amendment has, but this enables and compels states to assure vital information held by the public is shared and understood widely.
REV. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Congress shall see that nothing abridges the freedom of speech and the primary methods or systems of it shall not be abridged and be first accessible for the purpose of the unity of the people in order to alter or abolish government destructive to their unalienable rights, or with its possible greater meaning through understanding one another in; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Congress shall see that nothing abridges freedom of the press in its service to the unity of the people; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances or defense of this constitution.
People of states would submit petition with a mandatory number of signatures regarding the production of an order to the largest corporate media of the state compelling the production of documentary or other appropriate form sharing the information by the corporation using state corporate licensure as leverage to compliance.
The petition would show that the information was vital to the continuity of constitution principles, that the public generally does not currently know the information and that the information was not easily available by product of promotion.
Last edited:
