Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
Anyone else notice the irony in this statement?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
Someone should notice the "freedom" to kill babies that's found in ALL slave religions:Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
Anyone else notice the irony in this statement?
Someone should notice the "freedom" to kill babies that's found in ALL slave religions:Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
Anyone else notice the irony in this statement?
"The more stringent will note that unlike the Hamas government, our government does not pay the salaries of rabbis who advocate the killing of babies.
"Is that so? Not really.
"For example, government ministries regularly transfer support and funding to a yeshiva whose rabbi determined that it is permissible to kill gentile babies 'because their presence assists murder, and there is reason to harm children if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us ... it is permissible to harm the children of a leader in order to stop him from acting evilly ... we have seen in the Halakha that even babies of gentiles who do not violate the seven Noahide laws, there is cause to kill them because of the future threat that will be caused if they are raised to be wicked people like their parents.'"
Who is funding the rabbi who endorses killing gentile babies? - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
This is not the Flame Zone and you're out of order to Freudian Stage I and II ad hominem attack a long-time USMB poster. Please don't do that again. Just stick to facts, hm?so the terrorist lover can kiss my jew butt.
First you have to shampoo and platt "The Hair Down There"
Tinny brain, your threads are already downhill, you lowlife Hamas terrorist supporter.Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
Tinny brain, your threads are already downhill, you lowlife Hamas terrorist supporter.Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
You answered your own question, ninny.Tinny brain, your threads are already downhill, you lowlife Hamas terrorist supporter.Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
So basically, the IDF is allowed to fight for their people and land, but the arabs are terrorists? Please make some sense.
You answered your own question, ninny.Tinny brain, your threads are already downhill, you lowlife Hamas terrorist supporter.
So basically, the IDF is allowed to fight for their people and land, but the arabs are terrorists? Please make some sense.
No but it seemed to confuse the writer.You answered your own question, ninny.So basically, the IDF is allowed to fight for their people and land, but the arabs are terrorists? Please make some sense.
Fuck man, was my post too difficult for you to understand?
Comparing the IDF to terrorist animals like Hamas is like comparing the US military to Al Queda. One day you will shock me and say something intelligent.Tinny brain, your threads are already downhill, you lowlife Hamas terrorist supporter.Anyone else notice that the first response was deflection and the thread went downhill from there?
So basically, the IDF is allowed to fight for their people and land, but the arabs are terrorists? Please make some sense.
Comparing the IDF to terrorist animals like Hamas is like comparing the US military to Al Queda. One day you will shock me and say something intelligent.Tinny brain, your threads are already downhill, you lowlife Hamas terrorist supporter.
So basically, the IDF is allowed to fight for their people and land, but the arabs are terrorists? Please make some sense.
No problem, then the latter can have their asses kicked in the process too, of course. That's fair, no?I'm not comparing anyone with anyone except to say that if Jews/Israelis can fight for what they say is their land, so can Muslims/Arabs.
Comparing the IDF to terrorist animals like Hamas is like comparing the US military to Al Queda. One day you will shock me and say something intelligent.Tinny brain, your threads are already downhill, you lowlife Hamas terrorist supporter.
So basically, the IDF is allowed to fight for their people and land, but the arabs are terrorists? Please make some sense.
Comparing the IDF to terrorist animals like Hamas is like comparing the US military to Al Queda. One day you will shock me and say something intelligent.So basically, the IDF is allowed to fight for their people and land, but the arabs are terrorists? Please make some sense.
I doubt it.
"Casualties of the conflict in Iraq since 2003 (beginning with the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and continuing with the ensuing occupation of Iraq, as well as the activities of the various armed groups operating in the country) have come in many forms, and the accuracy of the information available on different types of Iraq War casualties varies greatly.
The table below summarizes various estimates of the Iraqi casualty figures.
Source Casualties Time period
Iraq Family Health Survey 151,000 violent deaths March 2003 to June 2006
Lancet survey 601,027 violent deaths out of 654,965 excess deaths March 2003 to June 2006
Opinion Research Business survey 1,033,000 deaths as a result of the conflict March 2003 to August 2007
Associated Press 110,600 deaths March 2003 to April 2009
Iraq Body Count project 105,052114,731 civilian deaths as a result of the conflict. Over 162,000 civilian and combatant deaths[1][2] March 2003 to January 2012
WikiLeaks. Classified Iraq war logs[1][3][4][5] 109,032 deaths including 66,081 civilian deaths.[6][7] January 2004 to December 2009"
Casualties of the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Casualties of the conflict in Iraq since 2003 (beginning with the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and continuing with the ensuing occupation of Iraq, as well as the activities of the various armed groups operating in the country) have come in many forms, and the accuracy of the information available on different types of Iraq War casualties varies greatly.
The table below summarizes various estimates of the Iraqi casualty figures.
Source Casualties Time period
Iraq Family Health Survey 151,000 violent deaths March 2003 to June 2006
Lancet survey 601,027 violent deaths out of 654,965 excess deaths March 2003 to June 2006
Opinion Research Business survey 1,033,000 deaths as a result of the conflict March 2003 to August 2007
Associated Press 110,600 deaths March 2003 to April 2009
Iraq Body Count project 105,052114,731 civilian deaths as a result of the conflict. Over 162,000 civilian and combatant deaths[1][2] March 2003 to January 2012
WikiLeaks. Classified Iraq war logs[1][3][4][5] 109,032 deaths including 66,081 civilian deaths.[6][7] January 2004 to December 2009"
Casualties of the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How do you account for the wide disparity in the figures and whose are credible?
BTW, many of the casualties were combatants and many more were the result of tribal squables.
Does it mean that hamas isn't trying?Guess what folks, the US military has killed WAY more innocent civilians in the past 10 years then Hamas EVER will.