Freedom in Iran, a realization of Bush's plan for the Middle East

Ignoring international law, Britain and the US opted for the high-risk strategy of regime change in order to pre-empt a volatile enemy in the Middle East. It was not Iraq, however, that was in the firing line but Iran, and the aftershocks are still being felt.

Fifty years ago this week, the CIA and the British SIS orchestrated a coup d'etat that toppled the democratically elected government of Mohammad Mossadegh. The prime minister and his nationalist supporters in parliament roused Britain's ire when they nationalised the oil industry in 1951, which had previously been exclusively controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Mossadegh argued that Iran should begin profiting from its vast oil reserves.

Britain accused him of violating the company's legal rights and orchestrated a worldwide boycott of Iran's oil that plunged the country into financial crisis. The British government tried to enlist the Americans in planning a coup, an idea originally rebuffed by President Truman. But when Dwight Eisenhower took over the White House, cold war ideologues - determined to prevent the possibility of a Soviet takeover - ordered the CIA to embark on its first covert operation against a foreign government.

A new book about the coup, All the Shah's Men, which is based on recently released CIA documents, describes how the CIA - with British assistance - undermined Mossadegh's government by bribing influential figures, planting false reports in newspapers and provoking street violence. Led by an agent named Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of President Theodore Roosevelt, the CIA leaned on a young, insecure Shah to issue a decree dismissing Mossadegh as prime minister. By the end of Operation Ajax, some 300 people had died in firefights in the streets of Tehran.

The crushing of Iran's first democratic government ushered in more than two decades of dictatorship under the Shah, who relied heavily on US aid and arms. The anti-American backlash that toppled the Shah in 1979 shook the whole region and helped spread Islamic militancy, with Iran's new hardline theocracy declaring undying hostility to the US.

Dan De Luce: The spectre of Operation Ajax | Politics | The Guardian
 
The CIA history of operation TPAJAX excerpted below was first disclosed by James Risen of The New York Times in its editions of April 16 and June 18, 2000, and posted in this form on its website at:

New York Times Special Report: The C.I.A. in Iran

This extremely important document is one of the last major pieces of the puzzle explaining American and British roles in the August 1953 coup against Iranian Premier Mohammad Mossadeq. Written in March 1954 by Donald Wilber, one of the operation’s chief planners, the 200-page document is essentially an after-action report, apparently based in part on agency cable traffic and Wilber’s interviews with agents who had been on the ground in Iran as the operation lurched to its conclusion.

Long-sought by historians, the Wilber history is all the more valuable because it is one of the relatively few documents that still exists after an unknown quantity of materials was destroyed by CIA operatives – reportedly “routinely” – in the 1960s, according to former CIA Director James Woolsey. However, according to an investigation by the National Archives and Records Administration, released in March 2000, “no schedules in effect during the period 1959-1963 provided for the disposal of records related to covert actions and, therefore, the destruction of records related to Iran was unauthorized.” (p. 22) The CIA now says that about 1,000 pages of documentation remain locked in agency vaults.

WebCite query result
 
Do you have any evidence besides wikipedia?

"Evidence" of what? The fact that the CIA played a major role in the 1953 removal of prime minister Mohammad Mossadeq and parliamentary democracy in Iran is a historical reality; I'm not familiar with anyone that denies its occurrence. As put in this book review on the CIA's website:

[T]he CIA carried out its first successful regime-change operation over half a century ago. The target was not an oppressive Soviet puppet but a democratically elected government whose populist ideology and nationalist fervor threatened Western economic and geopolitical interests. The CIA's covert intervention—codenamed TPAJAX—preserved the Shah's power and protected Western control of a hugely lucrative oil infrastructure. It also transformed a turbulent constitutional monarchy into an absolutist kingship and induced a succession of unintended consequences at least as far ahead as the Islamic revolution of 1979

Similar anti-democratic regime changes backed by the CIA were those of presidents Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala and Salvador Allende in Chile, just to name two that immediately jump to mind. I wouldn't have been surprised if Hugo Chavez had been in the bulls-eye of the Bush regime for a time either.
 
only if you really want to twist it
which it is clear you do
You claimed that our actions were limited to "advising." I demonstrated that you were incorrect. I have not twisted anything.

and again, the Shah was ALREADY SHAH
Power became far more concentrated in his hands as a result of the coup. He was, as I said, a puppet monarch.
and thats all it was, asshole
 
Do you have any evidence besides wikipedia?

"Evidence" of what? The fact that the CIA played a major role in the 1953 removal of prime minister Mohammad Mossadeq and parliamentary democracy in Iran is a historical reality; I'm not familiar with anyone that denies its occurrence. As put in this book review on the CIA's website:

[T]he CIA carried out its first successful regime-change operation over half a century ago. The target was not an oppressive Soviet puppet but a democratically elected government whose populist ideology and nationalist fervor threatened Western economic and geopolitical interests. The CIA's covert intervention—codenamed TPAJAX—preserved the Shah's power and protected Western control of a hugely lucrative oil infrastructure. It also transformed a turbulent constitutional monarchy into an absolutist kingship and induced a succession of unintended consequences at least as far ahead as the Islamic revolution of 1979

Similar anti-democratic regime changes backed by the CIA were those of presidents Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala and Salvador Allende in Chile, just to name two that immediately jump to mind. I wouldn't have been surprised if Hugo Chavez had been in the bulls-eye of the Bush regime for a time either.

Not saying those things are false; only that wikipedia is a joke and shouldn't be used as evidence.
 
Not saying those things are false; only that wikipedia is a joke and shouldn't be used as evidence.

I realize that Wikipedia-bashing is somewhat of a popular trend, but most pages on important topic are rigorously organized with appropriate citations simply as a result of numerous editors constantly monitoring the pages to maintain objectivity and factual accuracy. I'm not suggesting that you simply accept the words of Wikipedia, but it would obviously be reasonable to consult the cited sources.
 

Forum List

Back
Top