Franklin And His BFF, Joe Stalin

[regent]

7. Wait....did I say that Franklin Roosevelt made the sociopathic homicidal maniac, Joseph Stalin, his key political and military adviser???


Absolutely!


How else to explain Roosevelt's allowing Stalin to dictate who should work in his administration??


Get this:
a. "Not only did FDR overlook the external evidence; FDR ignored the counsel of key experts at the State Department, which, at the time, was home...to an educated and experienced cadre of anti-Communists....who would be neutralized and purged....
n 1937...the Russian research library at the State Department was broken up, the files on Communists, foreign and domestic, ordered destroyed.
The second, in 1943. Both purges took place under Soviet pressure and even direction as when in March 1943 Foreign Minister Litvinov, incredibly, handed over a list of American diplomats the Soviets wanted fired....a "guilt offering to Stalin from Roosevelt"...
West, "American Betrayal," p.193.


b. . Roosevelt purged anti-communist Foreign Service officers when given a "list of officials who were supposedly undermining American relations with Russia" by Soviet Foreign Minister Litvinov. The purges began in 1937, and, ironic, Litvinov was dragged out of his position and replaced with Molotov, by Stalin, because Litvinov was Jewish, and Stalin had treaties with Hitler. The purges were at the behest of Harry Hopkins.
Weil, " A pretty good club: The founding fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service," p. 91-92



Oh...did I mention that Harry Hopkins was both Roosevelt's live-in adviser, and Stalin's spy?

You must get this information to the history departments of all the major universities in the nation. Please do not delay any longer; the top rated American historians are still rating FDR as one of America's best three presidents. Have the communists cut off your communication with these historians or what is going on. This is indeed scary.

 

[JoeB131]

Someone did this experiment where they took a woman, locked her in a house all day and made her listen to Hate Radio. The results were not pretty.

"FDR was a Communist!!!!:"

"Evolution is a LIE!!!"

 

[PoliticalChic]

Instead, we had a President who supported Stalin and gave communism carte blanche in this country.

You seem unaware of that.

I am aware of that falsehood.

You clearly prefer that more Americans died in Europe- or perhaps that the Germans conquered all of Europe- rather than making an ally of convenience with the Soviet Union.

And FDR never gave 'carte blanche' to communism in the U.S.- just an idiotic claim.

You're clearly a fool.

1. I provided a sourced post supporting my contentions.

2. The aims of the CPUSA circa 1955 are almost identical to those of the current Democrat Party.



Yours is the response so typical of the government school grad.
And, no doubt, a reliable Democrat voter.

You're clearly a tool.

You have provided a bunch of stuff.

And your biased opinion.

If FDR had not aided the Soviets in 1941, it is more than likely either we never invaded Western Europe and the Third Reich continues until we start dropping atomic bombs on it- or they on us- or if we did invade, we lose thousands of more troops.

Your attempt at revisionist history is well noted.

Funny that you refer to 'revisionist history' when all you have is "it is more than likely."

Dunce, go back and read about the battle of Stalingrad, and Kursk.

Never a surprise, when the truth about FDR/Stalin/ communism is produced, you low-lives resort to claims that the one providing the truth wanted American soldiers dead.

Especially in light of the fact that Roosevelt extended the war by over two years, resulting in the commensurate deaths of Americans.

LOL- Roosevelt extended the war by 'over two years'? Seriously.....so you think that Roosevelt could have ended the War in Europe by May 1943? A year and a half after the United States entered the war?

Well that is a whopper.

I have read far more about the Battle of Stalingrad and Kursk than you are likely to ever stumble across.

How do you think the Soviets managed to move all of those tanks to Kursk?

American locomotives.

And that is not a slight on the brave Russians who fought- but American Lend Lease kept the Soviet Union alive while it ramped up production on T-34's and KV's- and supplied the trucks they used- and most importantly of all the rolling stock that moved the equipment from the factories to the front.

The USSR was highly dependent on rail transportation, but the war practically shut down rail equipment production: only about 92 locomotives were produced. 2,000 locomotives and 11,000 railcars were supplied under Lend-Lease. Likewise, the Soviet air force received 18,700 aircraft, which amounted to about 14% of Soviet aircraft production (19% for military aircraft).[19]

Although most Red Army tank units were equipped with Soviet-built tanks, their logistical support was provided by hundreds of thousands of U.S.-made trucks. Indeed by 1945 nearly two-thirds of the truck strength of the Red Army was U.S.-built. Trucks such as the Dodge 3/4 ton andStudebaker 2½ ton were easily the best trucks available in their class on either side on the Eastern Front. American shipments of telephone cable, aluminum, canned rations, and clothing were also critical.[20]

The Western Allies recognized that the USSR was vital to be fighting against the Nazi's.

You just want to do some Monday morning quarterbacking on how you think they should have done it- 60 years ago.

"LOL- Roosevelt extended the war by 'over two years'? Seriously..."

That' right, dolt.

Stalin told him to refuse to allow communication with the anti-Nazi German resistance, and that's exactly what happened.

What was the effect of Stalin's demand that no surrender by Germany be allowed?

1. First, the Allied command was not allowed to support or associate itself with the anti-Nazi resistance. Following the Soviet orders, only unconditional surrender would be considered....an order which prolonged the war by as much as a year: the army which would have overthrown Hitler and surrendered to the Allies would not be allowed to expect any hand in determining conditions of their post-war treatment.



a. "A SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force)directive prohibited activities aimed at promoting German revolt against the Nazi regime.
The Allied doctrine of unconditional surrender meant that "... those Germans — and particularly those German generals — who might have been ready to throw Hitler over, and were able to do so, were discouraged from making the attempt by their inability to extract from the Allies any sort of assurance that such action would improve the treatment meted out to their country."
German Resistance to Nazism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. The only national resistance not supported by the Allies under FDR was that of Germany....as per Stalin's instructions.
On May 10, 1945, shortly after the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany, General Dwight Eisenhower saluted and gave credit to Europe's resistance forces. He mentioned them by name,as follows: France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and Norway. 'You fought on,' he said in a speech carried by the BBC, "regardless of the disappointments you suffered and the danger you have undergone."
NYTimes, May 11, 1945, "Eisenhower Praises Anti-Nazi Resistance."

a. Who is missing from Eisenhower's list of national anti-Nazi resistance?

That's right: German anti-Nazis, of whom thousands were executed by the Reich.
"The History of the German Resistance, 1933-1945, Third Edition," by Peter Hoffman


Think it was an oversight on his part.....or was he just following orders?

Now...who could possibly give Supreme Commander orders?


Who?



3. Need more proof that you're a moron?

Sure.

Research Admiral Wm. Canaris.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war.
Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin - New York Times



Still waiting for you to show how Nazis and Soviets were 'literally opposite.'


Taking the time to change feet in your mouth?

Your link, Loser:
"Q&A Related to "Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People?"
Why did joesph Stalin kill so many people?

No one knows for sure, but he probably wanted to maintain stability and rid the country of possible threats, so that he would stay in power. Why did joesph Stalin ki

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Why did Stalin kill so many people?

"It is not true. The myth of mass killings in the Soviet Union (except for two years in the late 1930s) is all a pack of lies from Anti-Communist agitators. In fact only some 700,000 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=200801...

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

How many people did Stalin kill?

"There is an important distinction between how many people were killed directly, such as Stalin ordering their deaths - and how many people died as a direct consequence of his foolish How X Questions - Quora" Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

Now that makes a lot of fucking sense! LOL!

I sense your cry for help...but, sorry....nothing I can do to ameliorate your lack of discernment.

You wouldn't know a fact if one slapped you in the face.

Brilliant reposte!

You're firing on both neurons!

 

[PoliticalChic]

This thread does require the S.O.S. warning, It's redundant reiteration of fiction is just another example of the Same Old Spam...

Well ....then how about you show it to be 'fiction'?


Pick any item you can rebut.

Any.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"– 28,000,000 Soviets died—6700% more. In other words, 67 Soviets died for every 1 American."

But, you dope....it wasn't Hitler who killed most of them!
It was Franklin Roosevelt's BFF....Joseph Stalin.


World War II left over 27 million Soviet citizens dead....but only a fraction of them were killed by the Germans. Yet throughout the West. 'war crimes' is a phrase only attacked to the Nazis. When the Red Army marched, an NKVD army marched behind, with its own tanks, machine guns, firing forward....never allowing retreat. More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army.
"The Secret Betrayal"by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.



You are exactly what the Left wants, ignorance, and a reliable Democrat voter.

While you swallow every load Monarchists offer and then ask for second? How many of those thousands of recruits were right wing Nazis living in Ukraine?

"A committed monarchist, Tolstoy is Chancellor of the International Monarchist League. He was also Chairman of the London-based Russian Monarchist League, and chaired their annual dinner on 6 March 1986, when the Guest-of-Honour was the MPJohn Biggs-Davison. He was also in the chair for their Summer Dinner on 4 June 1987, at the Oxford and Cambridge Club in Pall Mall. Tolstoy was a founding committee member (January 1989) of the now established War and Peace Ball, held annually in London, which raises funds for White Russian charities."

Nikolai Tolstoy - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war.
Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin - New York Times



Still waiting for you to show how Nazis and Soviets were 'literally opposite.'


Taking the time to change feet in your mouth?

Your link, Loser:
"Q&A Related to "Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People?"
Why did joesph Stalin kill so many people?

No one knows for sure, but he probably wanted to maintain stability and rid the country of possible threats, so that he would stay in power. Why did joesph Stalin ki

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Why did Stalin kill so many people?

"It is not true. The myth of mass killings in the Soviet Union (except for two years in the late 1930s) is all a pack of lies from Anti-Communist agitators. In fact only some 700,000 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=200801...

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

How many people did Stalin kill?

"There is an important distinction between how many people were killed directly, such as Stalin ordering their deaths - and how many people died as a direct consequence of his foolish How X Questions - Quora" Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.


Nice spin...but the fact remains that it was Stalin, not Hitler who did the killing.

That is contrary to your earlier post, which implied that Stalin's losses were due to the Nazis.

Point for me....you.... "l'oeuf"

I'll make it simple enough for a conservative to follow: Hitler's invasion of Russia resulted an amount of loss equivalent the complete destruction of all the US east of Chicago. Those losses only happened because your side invaded Russia.

Yours is the sort of post one can expect from the loser in a debate.

My side is America.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Wait....did I say that Franklin Roosevelt made the sociopathic homicidal maniac, Joseph Stalin, his key political and military adviser???


Absolutely!


How else to explain Roosevelt's allowing Stalin to dictate who should work in his administration??


Get this:
a. "Not only did FDR overlook the external evidence; FDR ignored the counsel of key experts at the State Department, which, at the time, was home...to an educated and experienced cadre of anti-Communists....who would be neutralized and purged....
n 1937...the Russian research library at the State Department was broken up, the files on Communists, foreign and domestic, ordered destroyed.
The second, in 1943. Both purges took place under Soviet pressure and even direction as when in March 1943 Foreign Minister Litvinov, incredibly, handed over a list of American diplomats the Soviets wanted fired....a "guilt offering to Stalin from Roosevelt"...
West, "American Betrayal," p.193.


b. . Roosevelt purged anti-communist Foreign Service officers when given a "list of officials who were supposedly undermining American relations with Russia" by Soviet Foreign Minister Litvinov. The purges began in 1937, and, ironic, Litvinov was dragged out of his position and replaced with Molotov, by Stalin, because Litvinov was Jewish, and Stalin had treaties with Hitler. The purges were at the behest of Harry Hopkins.
Weil, " A pretty good club: The founding fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service," p. 91-92



Oh...did I mention that Harry Hopkins was both Roosevelt's live-in adviser, and Stalin's spy?

You must get this information to the history departments of all the major universities in the nation. Please do not delay any longer; the top rated American historians are still rating FDR as one of America's best three presidents. Have the communists cut off your communication with these historians or what is going on. This is indeed scary.

So.....nothing in my posts that you can deny....

...thus, a feeble attempt at 'humor.'

 

[JoeB131]

Stalin told him to refuse to allow communication with the anti-Nazi German resistance, and that's exactly what happened.

Oh, not this again.

The problem was, there really wasn't an "anti-Nazi resistance". There were army officers who tried to pull a coup when Germany was clearly losing, but the fact is, all these guys were fine with the war when Germany was winning.

None of the Allied leaders wanted to talk to these guys because the last thing they wanted was future German leaders doing what Hitler did after World War One, pass off a "Stabbed in the Back Legend" of a Germany that was winning the war until someone stabbed them in the back.

Germany had to be defeated and it had to be VERY CLEAR to them they had been defeated.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Someone did this experiment where they took a woman, locked her in a house all day and made her listen to Hate Radio. The results were not pretty.

"FDR was a Communist!!!!:"

"Evolution is a LIE!!!"

So.....nothing in my posts that you can deny....

...thus, a feeble attempt at 'humor.'


More proof that history if far from your strong suit.

 

[JoeB131]

So.....nothing in my posts that you can deny....

...thus, a feeble attempt at 'humor.'


More proof that history if far from your strong suit.

Naw, it's just you really can't fix crazy.

Birthers, 9/11 truthers, UFO Conspiracy nuts. No matter how many times you prove to them that there was a birth certificate, there really were planes crashing into the buildings, or it was really a weather balloon, they will insist otherwise.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So.....nothing in my posts that you can deny....

...thus, a feeble attempt at 'humor.'


More proof that history if far from your strong suit.

Naw, it's just you really can't fix crazy.

Birthers, 9/11 truthers, UFO Conspiracy nuts. No matter how many times you prove to them that there was a birth certificate, there really were planes crashing into the buildings, or it was really a weather balloon, they will insist otherwise.

You're funny as fast as your chubby little feet can take you away from any of the thread's substance.

Now....why is that?


'Cause you just don't know any history?

 

[JoeB131]

You're funny as fast as your chubby little feet can take you away from any of the thread's substance.

Now....why is that?


'Cause you just don't know any history?

No, becuase this is about the tenth thread you've started on this batshit crazy theme, and when people point out that the USSR really did most of the fighting in World War II or that no one was really interested in negotiating with the people who had spent years helping Hitler, you just keep repeating stuff that would get you laughed out of any university where they don't talk about talking snakes.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Stalin told him to refuse to allow communication with the anti-Nazi German resistance, and that's exactly what happened.

Oh, not this again.

The problem was, there really wasn't an "anti-Nazi resistance". There were army officers who tried to pull a coup when Germany was clearly losing, but the fact is, all these guys were fine with the war when Germany was winning.

None of the Allied leaders wanted to talk to these guys because the last thing they wanted was future German leaders doing what Hitler did after World War One, pass off a "Stabbed in the Back Legend" of a Germany that was winning the war until someone stabbed them in the back.

Germany had to be defeated and it had to be VERY CLEAR to them they had been defeated.

They were clearly defeated, they would have gladly surrendered to the US and Brits. Patton would have been in Berlin well ahead of the Soviets had not FDR sold out Eastern Europe to his Master, "Uncle Joe"

 

[JoeB131]

They were clearly defeated, they would have gladly surrendered to the US and Brits. Patton would have been in Berlin well ahead of the Soviets had not FDR sold out Eastern Europe to his Master, "Uncle Joe"

The Russians had three times as many troops engaged in the East than the allies had engaged in the west.

And if the Germans were so keen on surrendering to the US and Brits, why was the last gamble assault on the western front (The battle of the bulge?)

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're funny as fast as your chubby little feet can take you away from any of the thread's substance.

Now....why is that?


'Cause you just don't know any history?

No, becuase this is about the tenth thread you've started on this batshit crazy theme, and when people point out that the USSR really did most of the fighting in World War II or that no one was really interested in negotiating with the people who had spent years helping Hitler, you just keep repeating stuff that would get you laughed out of any university where they don't talk about talking snakes.

1. So...now you're not denying that the Allies could have ended the war earlier by aligning with anti-Nazi German resistance.

Good start.

Start asking yourself why they wouldn't.


2. USSR fought because Hitler turned on his long term ally, Stalin.
That has nothing to do with the fact that well before the war, FDR allied himself with a genocidal maniac.

3. The only ones who pretend to 'laugh at' the facts presented are those afraid of the truth....raise your paw.

And...I noticed the nth time you've tried to change the subject to some of your usual mumbo jumbo.
It really is all you've got.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They were clearly defeated, they would have gladly surrendered to the US and Brits. Patton would have been in Berlin well ahead of the Soviets had not FDR sold out Eastern Europe to his Master, "Uncle Joe"

The Russians had three times as many troops engaged in the East than the allies had engaged in the west.

And if the Germans were so keen on surrendering to the US and Brits, why was the last gamble assault on the western front (The battle of the bulge?)

Seems you believe that the Russians attacked the Germans.

Dope.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They were clearly defeated, they would have gladly surrendered to the US and Brits. Patton would have been in Berlin well ahead of the Soviets had not FDR sold out Eastern Europe to his Master, "Uncle Joe"

The Russians had three times as many troops engaged in the East than the allies had engaged in the west.

And if the Germans were so keen on surrendering to the US and Brits, why was the last gamble assault on the western front (The battle of the bulge?)

So they could defeat the west and direct all their efforts against your home team. Had they succeeded they would have gained the time necessary to build their jet fighters which would have swept the Soviet air force away and left them clear to obliterate Russian armor. Sort of what would have happened had the USA engaged your home team

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

 

[georgephillip]

While you swallow every load Monarchists offer and then ask for second? How many of those thousands of recruits were right wing Nazis living in Ukraine?

"A committed monarchist, Tolstoy is Chancellor of the International Monarchist League. He was also Chairman of the London-based Russian Monarchist League, and chaired their annual dinner on 6 March 1986, when the Guest-of-Honour was the MPJohn Biggs-Davison. He was also in the chair for their Summer Dinner on 4 June 1987, at the Oxford and Cambridge Club in Pall Mall. Tolstoy was a founding committee member (January 1989) of the now established War and Peace Ball, held annually in London, which raises funds for White Russian charities."

Nikolai Tolstoy - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war.
Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin - New York Times



Still waiting for you to show how Nazis and Soviets were 'literally opposite.'


Taking the time to change feet in your mouth?

Your link, Loser:
"Q&A Related to "Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People?"
Why did joesph Stalin kill so many people?

No one knows for sure, but he probably wanted to maintain stability and rid the country of possible threats, so that he would stay in power. Why did joesph Stalin ki

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Why did Stalin kill so many people?

"It is not true. The myth of mass killings in the Soviet Union (except for two years in the late 1930s) is all a pack of lies from Anti-Communist agitators. In fact only some 700,000 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=200801...

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

How many people did Stalin kill?

"There is an important distinction between how many people were killed directly, such as Stalin ordering their deaths - and how many people died as a direct consequence of his foolish How X Questions - Quora" Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.


Nice spin...but the fact remains that it was Stalin, not Hitler who did the killing.

That is contrary to your earlier post, which implied that Stalin's losses were due to the Nazis.

Point for me....you.... "l'oeuf"

I'll make it simple enough for a conservative to follow: Hitler's invasion of Russia resulted an amount of loss equivalent the complete destruction of all the US east of Chicago. Those losses only happened because your side invaded Russia.

Yours is the sort of post one can expect from the loser in a debate.

My side is America.

Your side supports the fascists who prosper from war regardless of which side "wins." The simple logic here reveals Stalin tore the guts out of your beloved Nazis by defeating 200 German divisions while the US/UK defeated 10. Can you manage that math?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war.
Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin - New York Times



Still waiting for you to show how Nazis and Soviets were 'literally opposite.'


Taking the time to change feet in your mouth?

Your link, Loser:
"Q&A Related to "Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People?"
Why did joesph Stalin kill so many people?

No one knows for sure, but he probably wanted to maintain stability and rid the country of possible threats, so that he would stay in power. Why did joesph Stalin ki

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Why did Stalin kill so many people?

"It is not true. The myth of mass killings in the Soviet Union (except for two years in the late 1930s) is all a pack of lies from Anti-Communist agitators. In fact only some 700,000 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=200801...

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

How many people did Stalin kill?

"There is an important distinction between how many people were killed directly, such as Stalin ordering their deaths - and how many people died as a direct consequence of his foolish How X Questions - Quora" Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.


Nice spin...but the fact remains that it was Stalin, not Hitler who did the killing.

That is contrary to your earlier post, which implied that Stalin's losses were due to the Nazis.

Point for me....you.... "l'oeuf"

I'll make it simple enough for a conservative to follow: Hitler's invasion of Russia resulted an amount of loss equivalent the complete destruction of all the US east of Chicago. Those losses only happened because your side invaded Russia.

Yours is the sort of post one can expect from the loser in a debate.

My side is America.

Your side supports the fascists who prosper from war regardless of which side "wins." The simple logic here reveals Stalin tore the guts out of your beloved Nazis by defeating 200 German divisions while the US/UK defeated 10. Can you manage that math?

"Your side supports the fascists..."



I ripped you a new one yesterday, in post #19- after you showed what a moron you are by claiming that the Nazis and Communists were 'literally the opposite.'


Now you're lying, claiming that I support fascists....


Time to destroy you again:

You weak-minded dolt.

Let's try an educated response instead.

Nazis or Communists:

1. Followed from Karl Marx's doctrines

2. Totalitarian big government

3. Command and Control economy

4. Practiced genocide.

5. Based on socialism

6. Imperialist

7. Anti-Semitic

8. Atheistic


Which one for each?????

Which???

The correct answer: for each of the above, BOTH


And you said they were "literally opposites"????

You ass.



OK...one difference: only one had FDR as BFF


Of course, fascists are right there on the political spectrum with Nazis and Communists....you imbecile.


Here's what I support:

1. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

 

[georgephillip]

Your link, Loser:
"Q&A Related to "Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People?"
Why did joesph Stalin kill so many people?

No one knows for sure, but he probably wanted to maintain stability and rid the country of possible threats, so that he would stay in power. Why did joesph Stalin ki

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Why did Stalin kill so many people?

"It is not true. The myth of mass killings in the Soviet Union (except for two years in the late 1930s) is all a pack of lies from Anti-Communist agitators. In fact only some 700,000 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=200801...

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

How many people did Stalin kill?

"There is an important distinction between how many people were killed directly, such as Stalin ordering their deaths - and how many people died as a direct consequence of his foolish How X Questions - Quora" Why Did Stalin Kill His Own People - Ask.com

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.


Nice spin...but the fact remains that it was Stalin, not Hitler who did the killing.

That is contrary to your earlier post, which implied that Stalin's losses were due to the Nazis.

Point for me....you.... "l'oeuf"

I'll make it simple enough for a conservative to follow: Hitler's invasion of Russia resulted an amount of loss equivalent the complete destruction of all the US east of Chicago. Those losses only happened because your side invaded Russia.

Yours is the sort of post one can expect from the loser in a debate.

My side is America.

Your side supports the fascists who prosper from war regardless of which side "wins." The simple logic here reveals Stalin tore the guts out of your beloved Nazis by defeating 200 German divisions while the US/UK defeated 10. Can you manage that math?

"Your side supports the fascists..."



I ripped you a new one yesterday, in post #19- after you showed what a moron you are by claiming that the Nazis and Communists were 'literally the opposite.'


Now you're lying, claiming that I support fascists....


Time to destroy you again:

You weak-minded dolt.

Let's try an educated response instead.

Nazis or Communists:

1. Followed from Karl Marx's doctrines

2. Totalitarian big government

3. Command and Control economy

4. Practiced genocide.

5. Based on socialism

6. Imperialist

7. Anti-Semitic

8. Atheistic


Which one for each?????

Which???

The correct answer: for each of the above, BOTH


And you said they were "literally opposites"????

You ass.



OK...one difference: only one had FDR as BFF


Of course, fascists are right there on the political spectrum with Nazis and Communists....you imbecile.


Here's what I support:

1. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Starting at the top, you're claiming Hitler and Stalin were both followers of Marx?
"Historians and biographers note some difficulty in identifying Adolf Hitler's political views.

"His writings and methods were often adapted to need and circumstance, although there were some steady themes, including antisemitism, anti-communism, anti-parliamentarianism, German expansionism, belief in the superiority of an 'Aryan race' and an extreme form of German nationalism.

"Hitler personally claimed he was fighting against Jewish Marxism.

Political views of Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Rip on, Aufseherinnen!