Fox News Sunday Anchors Upset About Obama's Job Growth:

yes he did; because both of the other reasons are merely factors of the first one
No, they are factors of AGING, not retirement. Only ONE aging factor is due to retirement. People become disabled at any age including before they reach retirement age. And family caretakers can also be any age.


you poor sad loser. why dont you just grow up and admit you were bested? aging and retirement are locked together in relevance. what have you posted to back up your premise that AGING AND DISABILITY DUE TO AGING, or disability for any reason for that matter, is a factor in lower Labor Force participation???
 
yes he did; because both of the other reasons are merely factors of the first one
No, they are factors of AGING, not retirement. Only ONE aging factor is due to retirement. People become disabled at any age including before they reach retirement age. And family caretakers can also be any age.


you poor sad loser. why dont you just grow up and admit you were bested? aging and retirement are locked together in relevance. what have you posted to back up your premise that AGING AND DISABILITY DUE TO AGING, or disability for any reason for that matter, is a factor in lower Labor Force participation???
That's right, disability due to AGING, not disability due to retirement! Many are disabled BEFORE they reach retirement age. And the third factor is as family members age many need constant caregivers and as a result working age able bodied family members leave the workplace to care for them. While some of these caregivers are retirement age and retire to provide care to a family member, most are younger than retirement age and return to work after the family member they are caring for passes.
 
yes he did; because both of the other reasons are merely factors of the first one
No, they are factors of AGING, not retirement. Only ONE aging factor is due to retirement. People become disabled at any age including before they reach retirement age. And family caretakers can also be any age.


you poor sad loser. why dont you just grow up and admit you were bested? aging and retirement are locked together in relevance. what have you posted to back up your premise that AGING AND DISABILITY DUE TO AGING, or disability for any reason for that matter, is a factor in lower Labor Force participation???
That's right, disability due to AGING, not disability due to retirement! Many are disabled BEFORE they reach retirement age. And the third factor is as family members age many need constant caregivers and as a result working age able bodied family members leave the workplace to care for them. While some of these caregivers are retirement age and retire to provide care to a family member, most are younger than retirement age and return to work after the family member they are caring for passes.



one more time; if you are making a distinction between aging and retirement; and between being disabled, then provide SOMETHING that shows that is a factor in the lower labor market participation. you cant
 
the very same losers insisting "obama's job growth" is real are the very same idiots still whining "the job creators arent creating jobs"

left-wing losers; always trying to have it both ways
 
one more time; if you are making a distinction between aging and retirement; and between being disabled, then provide SOMETHING that shows that is a factor in the lower labor market participation. you cant
Retirees and disabled are counted as not in labor force and therefore reduce the LPR.
DUH!
 
those are three factors of the same issue. they are not seperate reasons.

thanks for playing though......................
Too fucking retarded. :eusa_doh: he did not attribute 100% of the drop to baby boomers retiring.

And that was your claim, as though anybody did.


yes he did; because both of the other reasons are merely factors of the first one

you're such an intellectual midget; not even worthy of my time.

worse than a mental midget though is you just being a coward. you know what he said; all of the three items are related to each other, and that is being of retirement age. none of them explain why WORKING-AGE and ABLE-BODIED workers are dropping out of the Labor market
You're a fucking retard.

Ya see, this is why it's such a shame you struggle so with the English language. As a result, you can't understand what anyone says and you ultimately make a fool of yourself.

Ed gave three examples of folks who left the workforce. Only one of them was of baby boomers retiring. You're so brain-dead that to you, all three examples were baby boomers retiring. :cuckoo:

And of course you see things that aren't there -- you're still trying to show you didn't lie when you inferred that Liberals say the drop in the labor force is due 100% to retiring baby boomers.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top