Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
If you believe that the cable news landscape is symptomatic of our two-party political system, then you also probably, and predictably, saw a different tone in last nights election results. Fox News presented its coverage with a patina of celebration, while MSNBCs took a more gloom and doom approach. But there was one important distinction between the two outlets: Fox News offered a far more balanced set of analysts for the election coverage than did MSNBC. Almost all of the results from yesterdays midterm elections are in, and there is little question that the GOP has good reason to celebrate the returns. The U.S. House of Representatives has returned to Republican leadership and though its premature to definitively say as much, many have seen this as a referendum on the Obama administration.
Fox News key decision in their approach to covering the election last night was putting their heaviest hitters on the bench, choosing their up-and-comers Megyn Kelly and Bret Baier to serve as hosts of their coverage, an overt effort to have their news anchors cover the election results instead of their opinion hosts (as opposed to MSNBC.)
But not everyone saw it that way. Writing for the Washington Post, Dana Milbank was rather harsh in his critique, writing:
Fox News Fair And Balanced | MSNBC Political coverage | Mediaite