FOX decides name-recognition should be criteria for debate. maybe Bieber should run.

[dcraelin]

so because Bush has had a couple of fuck-up relatives in the presidency...he deserves a place on the debate stage....good idea FOX

 

[konradv]

Why shouldn't he be included? He's leading in the recent poll composite.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

 

[Pogo]

so because Bush has had a couple of fuck-up relatives in the presidency...he deserves a place on the debate stage....good idea FOX

....... Link?

 

[occupied]

Jeb Bush is the crown prince of GOP/MIC establishment, Get used to seeing his face.

 

[blackhawk]

I believe they are deciding on who should be in the debate based on their poll numbers seems reasonable enough. For those who disagree with this method how would you decide which candidates to put in the debate? Since your worried about debates how are Democrats going have them with only one legitimate candidate?

 

[whitehall]

Maybe they should invite George Stephonopolis to be the moderator if that would keep the progs from rioting.

 

[Katzndogz]

I believe they are deciding on who should be in the debate based on their poll numbers seems reasonable enough. For those who disagree with this method how would you decide which candidates to put in the debate? Since your worried about debates how are Democrats going have them with only one legitimate candidate?

obama would make the decision and personally appoint who he wants to debate.

 

[occupied]

I believe they are deciding on who should be in the debate based on their poll numbers seems reasonable enough. For those who disagree with this method how would you decide which candidates to put in the debate? Since your worried about debates how are Democrats going have them with only one legitimate candidate?

I hate it that democrats have only one "legitimate" candidate.

 

[Mac1958]

Why shouldn't he be included? He's leading in the recent poll composite.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

Kasich is easily one of the better, more qualified candidates, yet he's 11th in that data.

This is gonna be a mess.

.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Why shouldn't he be included? He's leading in the recent poll composite.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

Kasich is easily one of the better, more qualified candidates, yet he's 11th in that data.

This is gonna be a mess.

.

However, this may change...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Foxitis thread.

Seek help there is a cure

 

[konradv]

Foxitis thread. Seek help there is a cure

Do you even bother to read threads before you comment? Except for the subject line, it isn't about FOX at all!

 

[blackhawk]

Foxitis thread. Seek help there is a cure

Do you even bother to read threads before you comment? Except for the subject line, it isn't about FOX at all!

So if it's not about FOX what then? The only other thing I can see is the newest version of Bush Derangement Syndrome which is starting sooner than expected if the left is griping about Jeb being in a debate.

 

[konradv]

Do you even bother to read threads before you comment? Except for the subject line, it isn't about FOX at all!

So if it's not about FOX what then? The only other thing I can see is the newest version of Bush Derangement Syndrome which is starting sooner than expected if the left is griping about Jeb being in a debate.

I don't see that either. Trying reading FOR meaning, NOT reading meaning into the posts. It's not really that difficult, if you try to get over your own derangement.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

so because Bush has had a couple of fuck-up relatives in the presidency...he deserves a place on the debate stage....good idea FOX

Not doubting you. The media says plenty of things. But source your OP's, dude.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I believe they are deciding on who should be in the debate based on their poll numbers seems reasonable enough. For those who disagree with this method how would you decide which candidates to put in the debate? Since your worried about debates how are Democrats going have them with only one legitimate candidate?

I think the GOP nominees should get into a mud pit and wrestle. The last 10 standing get to stumble over whether or not they believe in evolution on Faux News during the "debate."

 

[blackhawk]

Do you even bother to read threads before you comment? Except for the subject line, it isn't about FOX at all!

So if it's not about FOX what then? The only other thing I can see is the newest version of Bush Derangement Syndrome which is starting sooner than expected if the left is griping about Jeb being in a debate.

I don't see that either. Trying reading FOR meaning, NOT reading meaning into the posts. It's not really that difficult, if you try to get over your own derangement.

Try answering the question instead of deflecting it's really not that difficult unless all you want to do is flap your gums.

 

[dcraelin]

Why shouldn't he be included? He's leading in the recent poll composite.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

the only reaso hes leading is name recognition...thats the point

 

[dcraelin]

so because Bush has had a couple of fuck-up relatives in the presidency...he deserves a place on the debate stage....good idea FOX

....... Link?

LINK?!!!!...its obvious on its face

 

[dcraelin]

I believe they are deciding on who should be in the debate based on their poll numbers seems reasonable enough. For those who disagree with this method how would you decide which candidates to put in the debate? Since your worried about debates how are Democrats going have them with only one legitimate candidate?

You have a bit of a point, but I've heard of some 19 that are somewhat prominent...Fiorina and Trump in business only I guess....Carson? in medical field ...but at least at first have them all


It looks like might have 4 democrats, like to see them all in a debate.