Fox bureau chief told reporters to be 'skeptical' on global warming, Libs flip out!

Discussion in 'Media' started by teapartysamurai, Dec 16, 2010.

  1. teapartysamurai
    Offline

    teapartysamurai Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    18,916
    Thanks Received:
    2,282
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,889
    Mark Tapscott: Oh the horror! Fox bureau chief told reporters to be 'skeptical' | Washington Examiner

    Now it's kind of obvious WHY liberals get this way about global warming. Because it's NOT about the climate. It's about their socialist dream of wealth distribution. Even the UN has admitted that.

    And they know global warming is a house of cards that won't stand up under examination. That's why Al Gore runs from any hint of a real debate and global warming whackos call anyone who brings up actual data a "denier."

    They know house of cards is built on a house of lies as well. The only way to continue pushing this fraud is to intimidate and shut up anyone questioning this fraud with the facts.

    But be skeptical is some kind of treason? I thought reporters were supposed to be skeptical. Not according to liberals. You are supposed to take the liberal agenda without question.

    When liberals go NUTS about simple questions being asked, then you know THEY know what they stand on is a house of cards. In other words, they know, even themselves, global warming, is a fraud!

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:








     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    I wonder why they don't get upset when ABC news runs the CDC report about food borne illness and neglects to mention the numbers are a sharp decline from the estimates used to justify the Food Safety bill, and then imply that if the bill wasn't stalled in Congress things would be better.
     
  3. waltky
    Offline

    waltky Wise ol' monkey Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    20,898
    Thanks Received:
    1,792
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Okolona, KY
    Ratings:
    +3,887
    Granny wantin' to know if dat means more Hispexicans gonna be movin' up here?...
    :confused:
    ‘Environmental refugees’ expected
    WASHINGTON Wed, Feb 23, 2011 - Fifty million “environmental refugees” will flood into the global north by 2020, fleeing food shortages sparked by climate change, experts warned at a major science conference that ended on Monday.
     
  4. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    Someone should tell the Libs, it is a Reporters Job to be skeptical all the time.

    DUH!
     
  5. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,574
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,676
    Sure they need to be skeptical, but why did FOX need to tell them to be skeptical on a particular subject? That's the point. They've turned a journalistic axiom into a politcal stance on a particular issue. They stepped in the sh_t by making the skepticism specific. That's not journalism, that's advocacy.
     
  6. Dr.Drock
    Offline

    Dr.Drock Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    9,680
    Thanks Received:
    940
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +940
    Global warming liberals don't want geologists or other scientists asking questions about global warming.

    Republican loving conservatives don't want engineers or architects asking questions about 9/11.

    Nobody in the world wants anyone to question or debate anything that has anything to do with their religion.

    This sounds pretty status quo to me.
     
  7. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,574
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,676
    If Global Warming is a religion, where's my tax break?!?! :mad:
     
  8. Dr.Drock
    Offline

    Dr.Drock Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    9,680
    Thanks Received:
    940
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +940
    Lol well done

    But i didn't say it was a religion just to clarify. People don't want certain views questioned or they'll pull the emotion card. Exchanging intellect for emotion in any debate is silly to me.
     
  9. R.D.
    Offline

    R.D. Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,445
    Thanks Received:
    2,374
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,375
    Because as early as the 80's the politics of global warming has been fodder for the left
    Are you really going to pretend this statement is off base?
    “Given the controversy over the veracity of climate change data, we should refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question. It is not our place as journalists to assert such notions as facts, especially as this debate intensifies.”
     
  10. The Joe
    Offline

    The Joe Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    88
    Thanks Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Omaha
    Ratings:
    +14

    What's well done? You're both ignorant. What do you call a tax credit for buying a hybrid automobile? A tax break. Let me know if you guys need more examples of tax breaks for the religion of marxism.
     

Share This Page