The latest word from Liberaldom is: Americans must finally have a dialogue about gun violence. As far as I know Democrats have been talking about it since JFK, RFK, and MLK were assassinated. No matter. Ill take their recent calls for dialogue to mean they want to hear from me, too. So here goes.
Were I to list all of the articles Ive read about gun control in the past fifty years you wont find one elected Democrat calling for repealing the Second Amendment. In fact, if you analyze their double-talk you will see they say they love the Second Amendment they just want to find a way to overturn it without repealing it.
What is new about the tragedy in Connecticut?
For one thing that sack of spit in the White House saw the murders of 20 young children as an opportunity to breathe new life into his failed attempt to set himself up as the nations spiritual leader. More to the point, Hussein & Company think those murdered children provided the momentum to make Communist morality the nations morality; i.e., disarm law-abiding Americans so Socialists can dictate all behavior without looking down the barrel of a rifle.
Heres the problem. The full weight of the government cannot protect anyone from an emotional cripple or a sick mind; so how are Americans going to protect themselves from a plethora of sick minds in government? Lets elaborate on that one a bit.
Media stooges would have Americans believe they cannot protect themselves from a government determined to gather up the guns anyway. Thats not true for several reasons.
1. Freedom-loving gun-owning Americans far outnumber government forces. The government can probably get away with confiscating a few guns one at a time until individual Americans see the threat to themselves and come together defending one other.
2. People living in brutal dictatorships manage to overthrow their governments; so there is not a chance any government can enslave a well-armed population willing to fight for itself.
3. Some Americans believe they need guns to protect against criminals. Many others believe they need guns to protect themselves from government which is what the Founding Fathers intended. There is truth in both beliefs. There is also a powerful unspoken reason for gun ownership. You might die fighting criminals, or die fighting to keep your freedoms, but you wont die a victim.
4. The government can only confiscate those guns it knows about. I guarantee this latest push for gun control will settle down on registration. Democrats already said they want assault rifles registered if not banned. The confusion is compounded when folks like Bill OReilly and Charles Krauthammer say they do NOT want to mess with the Second Amendment then in the next breath say they want assault rifles registered with the FBI. The video even shows a drawing of an assault rifle for effect:
As far as Im concerned law-abiding Americans can own bazookas without registering them. I rest my case on this alone: Had the Founders thought about Americans registering their guns Im positive they would have said something about it after they stopped laughing.
Gun control racism
Blacks are using guns to kill a lot of blacks, yet the only time Democrat gun control mavens come out of the woodwork en masse is when whites get shot. That means one of two things.
1. Whites need more saving than blacks.
2. Hussein & Company do not want to disarm blacks.
I lean towards #2 because Hussein is, and always has been, a true believer in black liberation theology with a strong dose of pure communism mixed in. His background and associations make me doubt he shed genuine tears over the deaths of white children. My guess is that he is only sorry Adam Lanza was white. According to black supremacists blacks who preach the extermination of the white race would have been proud of a black man killing 20 white children.
Irrespective of the clever sophistry black Christian leaders preach from their pulpits, and their tax dollar chairs in the academy, black liberation means blacks exterminating or enslaving the white race. Black liberation does not mean a physical separation from the people blacks hate. The way Communists worked it out killing or enslaving whites is the only Christian way to liberate blacks. If screwball thinking like that does not give you a migraine nothing will.
In the same vein Ive always thought blacks harbor an intense hatred of Jews because Moses never told the Egyptians they all have to live together. Hell, Moses could not get the Jews out of Egypt fast enough. Conversely, the Hebrew Slave Chorus from Verdis Nabucco long for a return to their homeland; something I never heard from black liberation advocates.
Parenthetically, Ive posted this Youtube in other threads. Im posting it here because I cannot shake the feeling that blacks and whites see liberty differently:
Ill close with a warning to all gun owners. If you belong to the NRA, or to the Gun Owners of America, or to a local gun club, the government already has your name and address. If your name is on a list of gun owners of any kind the government has that list. Whether or not the government knows how many guns you own is incidental.
Were I to list all of the articles Ive read about gun control in the past fifty years you wont find one elected Democrat calling for repealing the Second Amendment. In fact, if you analyze their double-talk you will see they say they love the Second Amendment they just want to find a way to overturn it without repealing it.
What is new about the tragedy in Connecticut?
For one thing that sack of spit in the White House saw the murders of 20 young children as an opportunity to breathe new life into his failed attempt to set himself up as the nations spiritual leader. More to the point, Hussein & Company think those murdered children provided the momentum to make Communist morality the nations morality; i.e., disarm law-abiding Americans so Socialists can dictate all behavior without looking down the barrel of a rifle.
Heres the problem. The full weight of the government cannot protect anyone from an emotional cripple or a sick mind; so how are Americans going to protect themselves from a plethora of sick minds in government? Lets elaborate on that one a bit.
Media stooges would have Americans believe they cannot protect themselves from a government determined to gather up the guns anyway. Thats not true for several reasons.
1. Freedom-loving gun-owning Americans far outnumber government forces. The government can probably get away with confiscating a few guns one at a time until individual Americans see the threat to themselves and come together defending one other.
2. People living in brutal dictatorships manage to overthrow their governments; so there is not a chance any government can enslave a well-armed population willing to fight for itself.
3. Some Americans believe they need guns to protect against criminals. Many others believe they need guns to protect themselves from government which is what the Founding Fathers intended. There is truth in both beliefs. There is also a powerful unspoken reason for gun ownership. You might die fighting criminals, or die fighting to keep your freedoms, but you wont die a victim.
4. The government can only confiscate those guns it knows about. I guarantee this latest push for gun control will settle down on registration. Democrats already said they want assault rifles registered if not banned. The confusion is compounded when folks like Bill OReilly and Charles Krauthammer say they do NOT want to mess with the Second Amendment then in the next breath say they want assault rifles registered with the FBI. The video even shows a drawing of an assault rifle for effect:
As far as Im concerned law-abiding Americans can own bazookas without registering them. I rest my case on this alone: Had the Founders thought about Americans registering their guns Im positive they would have said something about it after they stopped laughing.
Gun control racism
Blacks are using guns to kill a lot of blacks, yet the only time Democrat gun control mavens come out of the woodwork en masse is when whites get shot. That means one of two things.
1. Whites need more saving than blacks.
2. Hussein & Company do not want to disarm blacks.
I lean towards #2 because Hussein is, and always has been, a true believer in black liberation theology with a strong dose of pure communism mixed in. His background and associations make me doubt he shed genuine tears over the deaths of white children. My guess is that he is only sorry Adam Lanza was white. According to black supremacists blacks who preach the extermination of the white race would have been proud of a black man killing 20 white children.
Irrespective of the clever sophistry black Christian leaders preach from their pulpits, and their tax dollar chairs in the academy, black liberation means blacks exterminating or enslaving the white race. Black liberation does not mean a physical separation from the people blacks hate. The way Communists worked it out killing or enslaving whites is the only Christian way to liberate blacks. If screwball thinking like that does not give you a migraine nothing will.
In the same vein Ive always thought blacks harbor an intense hatred of Jews because Moses never told the Egyptians they all have to live together. Hell, Moses could not get the Jews out of Egypt fast enough. Conversely, the Hebrew Slave Chorus from Verdis Nabucco long for a return to their homeland; something I never heard from black liberation advocates.
Parenthetically, Ive posted this Youtube in other threads. Im posting it here because I cannot shake the feeling that blacks and whites see liberty differently:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=kTo0Inuvlxk]Nana Mouskouri - Song for Liberty - YouTube[/ame]
Ill close with a warning to all gun owners. If you belong to the NRA, or to the Gun Owners of America, or to a local gun club, the government already has your name and address. If your name is on a list of gun owners of any kind the government has that list. Whether or not the government knows how many guns you own is incidental.
