Found in the Churchill Archive, the Palestinians knew exactly what was going on early on.

[Roudy]

In other words Sephardic, Moroccan, Yemenite nad Ashkenazi Jews were more 'Palestinian' culturally, than the Arab Palestinians who lost almost all connections to their roots and original culture.

These same Mizrahi / Sephardic Jews who are descendants of the ancient Israelites, now comprise a majority of Israelis. The Jews are therfore truly back home, finally.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them. They were amazingly peaceful at the time considering they were facing an existential threat by the Jews supported by the most powerful empire at the time, the British.

REPORT
ON THE STATE OF PALESTINE
DURING FOUR YEARS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED
TO THE MANDATE COMMISSION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
THROUGH
H.E. THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR PALESTINE
BY
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
PALESTINE ARAB CONGRESS

Report on Palestine Administration

Foreword

The Palestine Arab Case against Zionist Aggression has repeatedly been submitted to the League of Nations and to the World Public Opinion in general and that of England in particular, by several deputations that have been delegated for this purpose to the League, to England and to the Lausanne Peace Conference, by the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, who form over 91% of its population; as well as by the different branches of the Palestine Arab Congress in that country and abroad. That case may be summed up in the following:- The injustice of creating a National Home for the Jews in Palestine which is the well-established home of the Palestinian Arabs (Moslems and Christians) and the impracticability of training its inhabitants in self-government and preparing them for independence, which is the principal aim of the mandatory system, as long as the Jewish National Home Policy is in progress.

…

Conclusion

The Palestine Arabs met this oppressive policy with patience. Their opposition has been conducted on constitutional methods. But this attitude of theirs has been both misrepresented by the Government and misunderstood by the Mandatory. The daily slight frictions between Arab and Jew, whose ideas, principles, customs and modes of life take diametrically divergent lines cultivate and solidify hatred between both communities, and there must come a time when it will accumulate to such a degree as to defy all moral or political restraints. It is a gross error to believe that Arab and Jew may come to an understanding if only each of them exchanges his coat of extremism for another of moderation. When the principles underlying two movements do clash, it is futile to expect their meeting halfway. The Zionist Policy is best described by Dr. Eder, ex-chairman of the Zionist Executive in Palestine, when he was asked to do so by the Court of Inquiry for the Jaffa disturbances of May 1921: “There can only be one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the number of that race are sufficiently increased.”

Arab Demand

The Arab demand may be summed up in the following words: The establishment in Palestine of a National Constitutional Government in which the two Communities, Arab and Jewish, will be represented in proportion to their numbers as they existed before the application of the Zionist Policy.

JAMAAL HUSSEINI
General Secretary
Executive Committee of the Palestine Arab Congress.
JERUSALEM. 6th Oct. 1924

Source 2 - Extracts from a report to the League of Nations by the Palestine Arab Congress in October 1924

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them.

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

 

[Hollie]

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them. They were amazingly peaceful at the time considering they were facing an existential threat by the Jews supported by the most powerful empire at the time, the British.

REPORT
ON THE STATE OF PALESTINE
DURING FOUR YEARS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED
TO THE MANDATE COMMISSION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
THROUGH
H.E. THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR PALESTINE
BY
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
PALESTINE ARAB CONGRESS

Report on Palestine Administration

Foreword

The Palestine Arab Case against Zionist Aggression has repeatedly been submitted to the League of Nations and to the World Public Opinion in general and that of England in particular, by several deputations that have been delegated for this purpose to the League, to England and to the Lausanne Peace Conference, by the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, who form over 91% of its population; as well as by the different branches of the Palestine Arab Congress in that country and abroad. That case may be summed up in the following:- The injustice of creating a National Home for the Jews in Palestine which is the well-established home of the Palestinian Arabs (Moslems and Christians) and the impracticability of training its inhabitants in self-government and preparing them for independence, which is the principal aim of the mandatory system, as long as the Jewish National Home Policy is in progress.

…

Conclusion

The Palestine Arabs met this oppressive policy with patience. Their opposition has been conducted on constitutional methods. But this attitude of theirs has been both misrepresented by the Government and misunderstood by the Mandatory. The daily slight frictions between Arab and Jew, whose ideas, principles, customs and modes of life take diametrically divergent lines cultivate and solidify hatred between both communities, and there must come a time when it will accumulate to such a degree as to defy all moral or political restraints. It is a gross error to believe that Arab and Jew may come to an understanding if only each of them exchanges his coat of extremism for another of moderation. When the principles underlying two movements do clash, it is futile to expect their meeting halfway. The Zionist Policy is best described by Dr. Eder, ex-chairman of the Zionist Executive in Palestine, when he was asked to do so by the Court of Inquiry for the Jaffa disturbances of May 1921: “There can only be one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the number of that race are sufficiently increased.”

Arab Demand

The Arab demand may be summed up in the following words: The establishment in Palestine of a National Constitutional Government in which the two Communities, Arab and Jewish, will be represented in proportion to their numbers as they existed before the application of the Zionist Policy.

JAMAAL HUSSEINI
General Secretary
Executive Committee of the Palestine Arab Congress.
JERUSALEM. 6th Oct. 1924

Source 2 - Extracts from a report to the League of Nations by the Palestine Arab Congress in October 1924

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them.

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them. They were amazingly peaceful at the time considering they were facing an existential threat by the Jews supported by the most powerful empire at the time, the British.

REPORT
ON THE STATE OF PALESTINE
DURING FOUR YEARS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED
TO THE MANDATE COMMISSION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
THROUGH
H.E. THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR PALESTINE
BY
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
PALESTINE ARAB CONGRESS

Report on Palestine Administration

Foreword

The Palestine Arab Case against Zionist Aggression has repeatedly been submitted to the League of Nations and to the World Public Opinion in general and that of England in particular, by several deputations that have been delegated for this purpose to the League, to England and to the Lausanne Peace Conference, by the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, who form over 91% of its population; as well as by the different branches of the Palestine Arab Congress in that country and abroad. That case may be summed up in the following:- The injustice of creating a National Home for the Jews in Palestine which is the well-established home of the Palestinian Arabs (Moslems and Christians) and the impracticability of training its inhabitants in self-government and preparing them for independence, which is the principal aim of the mandatory system, as long as the Jewish National Home Policy is in progress.

…

Conclusion

The Palestine Arabs met this oppressive policy with patience. Their opposition has been conducted on constitutional methods. But this attitude of theirs has been both misrepresented by the Government and misunderstood by the Mandatory. The daily slight frictions between Arab and Jew, whose ideas, principles, customs and modes of life take diametrically divergent lines cultivate and solidify hatred between both communities, and there must come a time when it will accumulate to such a degree as to defy all moral or political restraints. It is a gross error to believe that Arab and Jew may come to an understanding if only each of them exchanges his coat of extremism for another of moderation. When the principles underlying two movements do clash, it is futile to expect their meeting halfway. The Zionist Policy is best described by Dr. Eder, ex-chairman of the Zionist Executive in Palestine, when he was asked to do so by the Court of Inquiry for the Jaffa disturbances of May 1921: “There can only be one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the number of that race are sufficiently increased.”

Arab Demand

The Arab demand may be summed up in the following words: The establishment in Palestine of a National Constitutional Government in which the two Communities, Arab and Jewish, will be represented in proportion to their numbers as they existed before the application of the Zionist Policy.

JAMAAL HUSSEINI
General Secretary
Executive Committee of the Palestine Arab Congress.
JERUSALEM. 6th Oct. 1924

Source 2 - Extracts from a report to the League of Nations by the Palestine Arab Congress in October 1924

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them.

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

There was no dhimmi system in Palestine and nobody mentioned wanting one. Even the native Jews did not want a Jewish state.

 

[Hollie]

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them. They were amazingly peaceful at the time considering they were facing an existential threat by the Jews supported by the most powerful empire at the time, the British.

REPORT
ON THE STATE OF PALESTINE
DURING FOUR YEARS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED
TO THE MANDATE COMMISSION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
THROUGH
H.E. THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR PALESTINE
BY
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
PALESTINE ARAB CONGRESS

Report on Palestine Administration

Foreword

The Palestine Arab Case against Zionist Aggression has repeatedly been submitted to the League of Nations and to the World Public Opinion in general and that of England in particular, by several deputations that have been delegated for this purpose to the League, to England and to the Lausanne Peace Conference, by the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, who form over 91% of its population; as well as by the different branches of the Palestine Arab Congress in that country and abroad. That case may be summed up in the following:- The injustice of creating a National Home for the Jews in Palestine which is the well-established home of the Palestinian Arabs (Moslems and Christians) and the impracticability of training its inhabitants in self-government and preparing them for independence, which is the principal aim of the mandatory system, as long as the Jewish National Home Policy is in progress.

…

Conclusion

The Palestine Arabs met this oppressive policy with patience. Their opposition has been conducted on constitutional methods. But this attitude of theirs has been both misrepresented by the Government and misunderstood by the Mandatory. The daily slight frictions between Arab and Jew, whose ideas, principles, customs and modes of life take diametrically divergent lines cultivate and solidify hatred between both communities, and there must come a time when it will accumulate to such a degree as to defy all moral or political restraints. It is a gross error to believe that Arab and Jew may come to an understanding if only each of them exchanges his coat of extremism for another of moderation. When the principles underlying two movements do clash, it is futile to expect their meeting halfway. The Zionist Policy is best described by Dr. Eder, ex-chairman of the Zionist Executive in Palestine, when he was asked to do so by the Court of Inquiry for the Jaffa disturbances of May 1921: “There can only be one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the number of that race are sufficiently increased.”

Arab Demand

The Arab demand may be summed up in the following words: The establishment in Palestine of a National Constitutional Government in which the two Communities, Arab and Jewish, will be represented in proportion to their numbers as they existed before the application of the Zionist Policy.

JAMAAL HUSSEINI
General Secretary
Executive Committee of the Palestine Arab Congress.
JERUSALEM. 6th Oct. 1924

Source 2 - Extracts from a report to the League of Nations by the Palestine Arab Congress in October 1924

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them.

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

There was no dhimmi system in Palestine and nobody mentioned wanting one. Even the native Jews did not want a Jewish state.

Such an angry Islamist. The fact is, islamism has a 1,400 year history of intolerance toward competing religions. Islamism has never provided equal rights to non-muhammedans and has never treated the kuffar as equals with equal rights and privileges.

You can whine all you wish but Jewish immigrants to the area of Pal'istan would have no expectations of any accommodation or acceptance by the Islamist conquerors / settlers.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them. They were amazingly peaceful at the time considering they were facing an existential threat by the Jews supported by the most powerful empire at the time, the British.

REPORT
ON THE STATE OF PALESTINE
DURING FOUR YEARS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED
TO THE MANDATE COMMISSION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
THROUGH
H.E. THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR PALESTINE
BY
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
PALESTINE ARAB CONGRESS

Report on Palestine Administration

Foreword

The Palestine Arab Case against Zionist Aggression has repeatedly been submitted to the League of Nations and to the World Public Opinion in general and that of England in particular, by several deputations that have been delegated for this purpose to the League, to England and to the Lausanne Peace Conference, by the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, who form over 91% of its population; as well as by the different branches of the Palestine Arab Congress in that country and abroad. That case may be summed up in the following:- The injustice of creating a National Home for the Jews in Palestine which is the well-established home of the Palestinian Arabs (Moslems and Christians) and the impracticability of training its inhabitants in self-government and preparing them for independence, which is the principal aim of the mandatory system, as long as the Jewish National Home Policy is in progress.

…

Conclusion

The Palestine Arabs met this oppressive policy with patience. Their opposition has been conducted on constitutional methods. But this attitude of theirs has been both misrepresented by the Government and misunderstood by the Mandatory. The daily slight frictions between Arab and Jew, whose ideas, principles, customs and modes of life take diametrically divergent lines cultivate and solidify hatred between both communities, and there must come a time when it will accumulate to such a degree as to defy all moral or political restraints. It is a gross error to believe that Arab and Jew may come to an understanding if only each of them exchanges his coat of extremism for another of moderation. When the principles underlying two movements do clash, it is futile to expect their meeting halfway. The Zionist Policy is best described by Dr. Eder, ex-chairman of the Zionist Executive in Palestine, when he was asked to do so by the Court of Inquiry for the Jaffa disturbances of May 1921: “There can only be one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the number of that race are sufficiently increased.”

Arab Demand

The Arab demand may be summed up in the following words: The establishment in Palestine of a National Constitutional Government in which the two Communities, Arab and Jewish, will be represented in proportion to their numbers as they existed before the application of the Zionist Policy.

JAMAAL HUSSEINI
General Secretary
Executive Committee of the Palestine Arab Congress.
JERUSALEM. 6th Oct. 1924

Source 2 - Extracts from a report to the League of Nations by the Palestine Arab Congress in October 1924

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them.

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

There was no dhimmi system in Palestine and nobody mentioned wanting one. Even the native Jews did not want a Jewish state.

Such an angry Islamist. The fact is, islamism has a 1,400 year history of intolerance toward competing religions. Islamism has never provided equal rights to non-muhammedans and has never treated the kuffar as equals with equal rights and privileges.

You can whine all you wish but Jewish immigrants to the area of Pal'istan would have no expectations of any accommodation or acceptance by the Islamist conquerors / settlers.

All you have is slime.

 

[Hollie]

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them. They were amazingly peaceful at the time considering they were facing an existential threat by the Jews supported by the most powerful empire at the time, the British.

REPORT
ON THE STATE OF PALESTINE
DURING FOUR YEARS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED
TO THE MANDATE COMMISSION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
THROUGH
H.E. THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR PALESTINE
BY
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
PALESTINE ARAB CONGRESS

Report on Palestine Administration

Foreword

The Palestine Arab Case against Zionist Aggression has repeatedly been submitted to the League of Nations and to the World Public Opinion in general and that of England in particular, by several deputations that have been delegated for this purpose to the League, to England and to the Lausanne Peace Conference, by the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, who form over 91% of its population; as well as by the different branches of the Palestine Arab Congress in that country and abroad. That case may be summed up in the following:- The injustice of creating a National Home for the Jews in Palestine which is the well-established home of the Palestinian Arabs (Moslems and Christians) and the impracticability of training its inhabitants in self-government and preparing them for independence, which is the principal aim of the mandatory system, as long as the Jewish National Home Policy is in progress.

…

Conclusion

The Palestine Arabs met this oppressive policy with patience. Their opposition has been conducted on constitutional methods. But this attitude of theirs has been both misrepresented by the Government and misunderstood by the Mandatory. The daily slight frictions between Arab and Jew, whose ideas, principles, customs and modes of life take diametrically divergent lines cultivate and solidify hatred between both communities, and there must come a time when it will accumulate to such a degree as to defy all moral or political restraints. It is a gross error to believe that Arab and Jew may come to an understanding if only each of them exchanges his coat of extremism for another of moderation. When the principles underlying two movements do clash, it is futile to expect their meeting halfway. The Zionist Policy is best described by Dr. Eder, ex-chairman of the Zionist Executive in Palestine, when he was asked to do so by the Court of Inquiry for the Jaffa disturbances of May 1921: “There can only be one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the number of that race are sufficiently increased.”

Arab Demand

The Arab demand may be summed up in the following words: The establishment in Palestine of a National Constitutional Government in which the two Communities, Arab and Jewish, will be represented in proportion to their numbers as they existed before the application of the Zionist Policy.

JAMAAL HUSSEINI
General Secretary
Executive Committee of the Palestine Arab Congress.
JERUSALEM. 6th Oct. 1924

Source 2 - Extracts from a report to the League of Nations by the Palestine Arab Congress in October 1924

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them.

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

There was no dhimmi system in Palestine and nobody mentioned wanting one. Even the native Jews did not want a Jewish state.

Such an angry Islamist. The fact is, islamism has a 1,400 year history of intolerance toward competing religions. Islamism has never provided equal rights to non-muhammedans and has never treated the kuffar as equals with equal rights and privileges.

You can whine all you wish but Jewish immigrants to the area of Pal'istan would have no expectations of any accommodation or acceptance by the Islamist conquerors / settlers.

All you have is slime.

What you don't have is an ability to reconcile inconvenient truths about fascist Islamist ideology.

Lacking any countering argument, you're left to islamo-hissy fits.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

There was no dhimmi system in Palestine and nobody mentioned wanting one. Even the native Jews did not want a Jewish state.

Such an angry Islamist. The fact is, islamism has a 1,400 year history of intolerance toward competing religions. Islamism has never provided equal rights to non-muhammedans and has never treated the kuffar as equals with equal rights and privileges.

You can whine all you wish but Jewish immigrants to the area of Pal'istan would have no expectations of any accommodation or acceptance by the Islamist conquerors / settlers.

All you have is slime.

What you don't have is an ability to reconcile inconvenient truths about fascist Islamist ideology.

Lacking any countering argument, you're left to islamo-hissy fits.

You are the only one who mentions religion.

 

[Hollie]

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

There was no dhimmi system in Palestine and nobody mentioned wanting one. Even the native Jews did not want a Jewish state.

Such an angry Islamist. The fact is, islamism has a 1,400 year history of intolerance toward competing religions. Islamism has never provided equal rights to non-muhammedans and has never treated the kuffar as equals with equal rights and privileges.

You can whine all you wish but Jewish immigrants to the area of Pal'istan would have no expectations of any accommodation or acceptance by the Islamist conquerors / settlers.

All you have is slime.

What you don't have is an ability to reconcile inconvenient truths about fascist Islamist ideology.

Lacking any countering argument, you're left to islamo-hissy fits.

You are the only one who mentions religion.

Intentionally clueless? It's your Islamist terrorist heroes who feel a need to use their religion in the promotion of their religious fascism.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

There was no dhimmi system in Palestine and nobody mentioned wanting one. Even the native Jews did not want a Jewish state.

Such an angry Islamist. The fact is, islamism has a 1,400 year history of intolerance toward competing religions. Islamism has never provided equal rights to non-muhammedans and has never treated the kuffar as equals with equal rights and privileges.

You can whine all you wish but Jewish immigrants to the area of Pal'istan would have no expectations of any accommodation or acceptance by the Islamist conquerors / settlers.

All you have is slime.

What you don't have is an ability to reconcile inconvenient truths about fascist Islamist ideology.

Lacking any countering argument, you're left to islamo-hissy fits.

You are the only one who mentions religion.

Intentionally clueless? It's your Islamist terrorist heroes who feel a need to use their religion in the promotion of their religious fascism.

Link?

 

[Hollie]

Such an angry Islamist. The fact is, islamism has a 1,400 year history of intolerance toward competing religions. Islamism has never provided equal rights to non-muhammedans and has never treated the kuffar as equals with equal rights and privileges.

You can whine all you wish but Jewish immigrants to the area of Pal'istan would have no expectations of any accommodation or acceptance by the Islamist conquerors / settlers.

All you have is slime.

What you don't have is an ability to reconcile inconvenient truths about fascist Islamist ideology.

Lacking any countering argument, you're left to islamo-hissy fits.

You are the only one who mentions religion.

Intentionally clueless? It's your Islamist terrorist heroes who feel a need to use their religion in the promotion of their religious fascism.

Link?

We can start with your Islamic terrorist heroes in Hamas. You can find the Hamas charter online.

Why don't you read the introduction and, since you're inadequate at actually assembling words into meaningful sentences, find a YouTube video you can post to explain what that means.

 

[P F Tinmore]

All you have is slime.

What you don't have is an ability to reconcile inconvenient truths about fascist Islamist ideology.

Lacking any countering argument, you're left to islamo-hissy fits.

You are the only one who mentions religion.

Intentionally clueless? It's your Islamist terrorist heroes who feel a need to use their religion in the promotion of their religious fascism.

Link?

We can start with your Islamic terrorist heroes in Hamas. You can find the Hamas charter online.

Why don't you read the introduction and, since you're inadequate at actually assembling words into meaningful sentences, find a YouTube video you can post to explain what that means.

I understand the OP. Perhaps you don't.

BTW, this was many decades before Hamas so I fail to see the relevance.

 

[Roudy]

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them. They were amazingly peaceful at the time considering they were facing an existential threat by the Jews supported by the most powerful empire at the time, the British.

REPORT
ON THE STATE OF PALESTINE
DURING FOUR YEARS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED
TO THE MANDATE COMMISSION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
THROUGH
H.E. THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR PALESTINE
BY
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
PALESTINE ARAB CONGRESS

Report on Palestine Administration

Foreword

The Palestine Arab Case against Zionist Aggression has repeatedly been submitted to the League of Nations and to the World Public Opinion in general and that of England in particular, by several deputations that have been delegated for this purpose to the League, to England and to the Lausanne Peace Conference, by the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, who form over 91% of its population; as well as by the different branches of the Palestine Arab Congress in that country and abroad. That case may be summed up in the following:- The injustice of creating a National Home for the Jews in Palestine which is the well-established home of the Palestinian Arabs (Moslems and Christians) and the impracticability of training its inhabitants in self-government and preparing them for independence, which is the principal aim of the mandatory system, as long as the Jewish National Home Policy is in progress.

…

Conclusion

The Palestine Arabs met this oppressive policy with patience. Their opposition has been conducted on constitutional methods. But this attitude of theirs has been both misrepresented by the Government and misunderstood by the Mandatory. The daily slight frictions between Arab and Jew, whose ideas, principles, customs and modes of life take diametrically divergent lines cultivate and solidify hatred between both communities, and there must come a time when it will accumulate to such a degree as to defy all moral or political restraints. It is a gross error to believe that Arab and Jew may come to an understanding if only each of them exchanges his coat of extremism for another of moderation. When the principles underlying two movements do clash, it is futile to expect their meeting halfway. The Zionist Policy is best described by Dr. Eder, ex-chairman of the Zionist Executive in Palestine, when he was asked to do so by the Court of Inquiry for the Jaffa disturbances of May 1921: “There can only be one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the number of that race are sufficiently increased.”

Arab Demand

The Arab demand may be summed up in the following words: The establishment in Palestine of a National Constitutional Government in which the two Communities, Arab and Jewish, will be represented in proportion to their numbers as they existed before the application of the Zionist Policy.

JAMAAL HUSSEINI
General Secretary
Executive Committee of the Palestine Arab Congress.
JERUSALEM. 6th Oct. 1924

Source 2 - Extracts from a report to the League of Nations by the Palestine Arab Congress in October 1924

The Palestinian leadership knew that the Zionists planned to expropriate them.

Indeed, the Zionists and Britain spoke openly about their colonial project. Britain had the Balfour Declaration in its pocket and was shoving the locals aside to cater to the Zionists. The Zionists were importing settlers by the boatload.

These settlers were not immigrants as they did not live with the locals but in separate colonies. There was no intention of living with the local population or mixing with the existing culture. They remained foreigners in Palestine.

Indeed, how does anyone "live with the locals" (Islamic fascists) when those locals had a 1,400 year history of institutionalized bigotry and subjugation of the minority population under dhimmitude.

Indeed, the muhammedan conquest of the area was about Islamist colonization and settlement

Notice, everytime he wants to spew his bullshit, he starts with "Indeed....blah blah blah..."