Former prosecutor explains how 9/11 changed the world

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Angelo, Jan 19, 2019.

  1. Skylar
    Offline

    Skylar Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    35,598
    Thanks Received:
    4,686
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +14,569
    Can you back ANY of that with facts? Or is this just your standard tactic of trying to justify a batshit conspiracy you can't possibly back with facts with ANOTHER batshit conspiracy you can't possibly back with facts?

    What's your evidence that Gore was 'paid off' not to fight the decision?
     
  2. Angelo
    Online

    Angelo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2019
    Messages:
    11,137
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    _Arkansas~_The Natural State_
    Ratings:
    +6,178
    He would have very likely won.
    And could have sued Florida for stopping the recount at the very least.
    He was paid. It happens.
     
  3. Angelo
    Online

    Angelo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2019
    Messages:
    11,137
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    _Arkansas~_The Natural State_
    Ratings:
    +6,178
    9/11 may have still happened under Gore/ Lieberman though.
    [​IMG]
     
  4. Skylar
    Offline

    Skylar Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    35,598
    Thanks Received:
    4,686
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +14,569
    Says who?

    Again, you keep citing your imagination as a legal standard.

    Who, pray tell, would Gore have appealed the Supreme Court's decision?

    That makes no sense at all. Gore lost the initial count in Florida. Why would Gore then sue to stop a recount that could have shown Gore actually won the vote in Florida?

    In Bush V. Gore, Bush was suing to stop the recount, Gore was suing to keep it going.

    Remember, you have no idea what you're talking about.

    And by 'it happens', you mean you imagined it.

    See, Angelo......you can't tell the difference between something actually happening, and you merely imagining it. As you keep presenting your imagination as actual events.

    Which might explain why your claims so consistently fail to convince reasonable people.
     
  5. Angelo
    Online

    Angelo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2019
    Messages:
    11,137
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    _Arkansas~_The Natural State_
    Ratings:
    +6,178
    Stop misquoting me and spinning everything I say.
     
  6. Skylar
    Offline

    Skylar Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    35,598
    Thanks Received:
    4,686
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +14,569
    It was the Supreme Court that stopped the recount in Bush V. Gore.

    Who then was Gore supposed to appeal the Supreme Court's decision to? You can't even describe the *process* by which your batshit works. Let alone the evidence of it.

    And again, what is your evidence that Gore was paid off? There's you TYPING the claim and....nothing. Just you, citing you, backed by nothing.

    Do you ever tire of just making shit up?
     

Share This Page