Former Canadien Minister Of Defense Warns Of UFOs And An Intergalactic War

[HUGGY]

We've been ringing the dinner bell ever since the invention of the radio. We have provided very nice pictures for the menu since television.

No alien species is going to "visit" our planet to do good for humans.

Every living species on our planet is predatory. Everything kills something to survive.

SOOOooo... we have to ask ourselves "what do we have in abundance that is rare in the universe?"

Pure liquid water and oxygen.... Oh ya and us.

The dumbest thing we ever did as a species was send out that spacecraft that attempts to transmit our location and menu fixins to any alien species that would care to come by for a snack.

We are stupid. We are surely eventually doomed. There is no saving any species including predators like us that do not keep in mind that there are more capable predators out there somewhere.

 

[Politico]

so you believe that these astronauts and defence minsters have all lost their minds and share the same delusions ?

If these guys were defense ministers they would have all the documentation to show us.

 

[Liability]

I would like to believe in UFOs. But the odds of any extra terrestrial race evolving quickly enough to produce the kind of intelligence and knowledge of science and technology that would permit interstellar flight at all, much less then having the ability to find US in our small sun-system on one small arm of one large galaxy in a universe vastly filled with galaxies are kind of BEYOND merely astronomical.

Possible?

Yes.

Likely?

Not even remotely.

 

[eots]

so you believe that these astronauts and defence minsters have all lost their minds and share the same delusions ?

If these guys were defense ministers they would have all the documentation to show us.

LOL...So now the conspiracy is these men are imposters ? ..they have both been on CNN and FOX..you think someone might of fact checked their credentials..no ? it is a easy Google search to determined they are in fact defence ministers and the Cooper and Edgar really need no introduction. I am trying to make sense of this myself but I find the explanations of imposters or some wave of mental illness that effects astronauts and defence minsters as highly improbable explanation

 

[Politico]

What are you on about? No one said they aren't who they are.

 

[Liability]

The Drake equation states that:

where:

N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;

and

R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fℓ = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time for which such civilizations release detectable signals into space[5]

-- icky Wiki: Drake equation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The so-called DRAKE Equation is a method some people use to "estimate to estimate the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy." -- id.

And THAT is all premised on guess-timation, but it doesn't even address the enormities of space BEYOND the Milky Way galaxy, the problem of interstellar travel and the remoteness of the odds of any of those beings finding us or even knowing about us.

 

[eots]

What are you on about? No one said they aren't who they are.

Politico
If these guys were defense ministers they would have all the documentation to show us.

????...It's a terrible thing when the mind goes...

 

[Liability]

What are you on about? No one said they aren't who they are.

Politico
If these guys were defense ministers they would have all the documentation to show us.

????...It's a terrible thing when the mind goes...

No no, id-eots. Your mind went long ago.

You just misunderstood what he was saying.

He did not intend to be read as challenging whether they had ever been defense ministers etc.

He was conditioning their statements on the proposition that AS defense ministers they should be expected to have had some proof of their claims, now.

 

[eots]

What are you on about? No one said they aren't who they are.

Politico
If these guys were defense ministers they would have all the documentation to show us.

????...It's a terrible thing when the mind goes...

No no, id-eots. Your mind went long ago.

You just misunderstood what he was saying.

He did not intend to be read as challenging whether they had ever been defense ministers etc.

He was conditioning their statements on the proposition that AS defense ministers they should be expected to have had some proof of their claims, now.

If these guys were defense ministers...

 

[Liability]

????...It's a terrible thing when the mind goes...

No no, id-eots. Your mind went long ago.

You just misunderstood what he was saying.

He did not intend to be read as challenging whether they had ever been defense ministers etc.

He was conditioning their statements on the proposition that AS defense ministers they should be expected to have had some proof of their claims, now.

If these guys were defense ministers...

"If plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen, then we ought to be able to see evidence of life on another planet by reading its atmosphere."

That is NOT a challenge to the proposition that plants breathe CO2 and excrete O2, you hapless nimrod.

 

[Politico]

And therein lies the root of conspiracy theories. They claim the people in government are hiding stuff. When those people actually come forward if you ask them to provide proof of the actions they admit to being involved in you are criticized and they latch onto an irrelevant point as a distraction as is happening right now. So to nip that in the bud. If someone is a defence minister or president or whomever and is directing an operation they would have access to and be able to show us all the proof.

 

[eots]

No no, id-eots. Your mind went long ago.

You just misunderstood what he was saying.

He did not intend to be read as challenging whether they had ever been defense ministers etc.

He was conditioning their statements on the proposition that AS defense ministers they should be expected to have had some proof of their claims, now.

If these guys were defense ministers...

"If plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen, then we ought to be able to see evidence of life on another planet by reading its atmosphere."

That is NOT a challenge to the proposition that plants breathe CO2 and excrete O2, you hapless nimrod.

Correction ..as plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen...FYI as and if are different words with different meanings

 

[Liability]

If these guys were defense ministers...

"If plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen, then we ought to be able to see evidence of life on another planet by reading its atmosphere."

That is NOT a challenge to the proposition that plants breathe CO2 and excrete O2, you hapless nimrod.

Correction as plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen...FYI as and if are different words with different meanings

You just unwittingly acknowledged that you are ignorant of basic idiomatic phrases.

Lots of the things you post are unwitting acknowledgements of your ignorance.

 

[eots]

"If plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen, then we ought to be able to see evidence of life on another planet by reading its atmosphere."

That is NOT a challenge to the proposition that plants breathe CO2 and excrete O2, you hapless nimrod.

Correction as plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen...FYI as and if are different words with different meanings

You just unwittingly acknowledged that you are ignorant of basic idiomatic phrases.

Lots of the things you post are unwitting acknowledgements of your ignorance.

Nonsense..you corrected the statement by replacing if with as .using as makes
the statement much more precise...and you know it

 

[Liability]

Correction as plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen...FYI as and if are different words with different meanings

You just unwittingly acknowledged that you are ignorant of basic idiomatic phrases.

Lots of the things you post are unwitting acknowledgements of your ignorance.

Nonsense..you corrected the statement by replacing if with as .using as makes
the statement much more precise...and you know it

Nonsense is your native tongue.

The revealed FACT is that you lack the grasp of a common idiomatic phrase.

Keep whining though. That would be all unusual and shit.

 

[Liability]

If id-eots is blathering then his posts will reveal his underlying ignorance.

Note that conditional hypothetical is NOT a claim that you are NOT blathering, id-eots.

It is merely the first premise of a syllogism.

Indeed, it is ultimately going to be RELIED upon, not denied.

Let's take a closer look, shall we? Yes. We shall.

If id-eots is blathering, then his posts will reveal his underlying ignorance.

id-eots is blathering.
_______________________________________________​

∴ id-eots' posts have revealed his underlying ignorance.​

 

[HenryBHough]

Clear that this moonbat has plans to emigrate to California and run for governor.

 

[eots]

If id-eots is blathering then his posts will reveal his underlying ignorance.

Note that conditional hypothetical is NOT a claim that you are NOT blathering, id-eots.

It is merely the first premise of a syllogism.

Indeed, it is ultimately going to be RELIED upon, not denied.

Let's take a closer look, shall we? Yes. We shall.

If id-eots is blathering, then his posts will reveal his underlying ignorance.

id-eots is blathering.
_______________________________________________​

∴ id-eots' posts have revealed his underlying ignorance.​

Keep grasping for straws..flail on

 

[HUGGY]

If these guys were defense ministers...

"If plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen, then we ought to be able to see evidence of life on another planet by reading its atmosphere."

That is NOT a challenge to the proposition that plants breathe CO2 and excrete O2, you hapless nimrod.

Correction ..as plants breathe carbon dioxide and excrete oxygen...FYI as and if are different words with different meanings

A lot happened before there were "plants" in the current form. This planet had an atmosphere that didn't permit life on land in any form as we know it for more than half of it's existence. Life and the resulting changing of our atmosphere started in the ocean.

Without liquid water, that nobody is absolutely sure how it got here, in the quantities we enjoy there would be no life on earth.

 

[eots]

Clear that this moonbat has plans to emigrate to California and run for governor.

Here is another one...and to which moonbat are you referring and how does your statement address the rest of the gentlemen in question ?