Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In a lawsuit (PDF) filed in a California court this week, Vera argues O'Keefe and Giles broke the law when they taped their conversation inside the ACORN office. California is one of about a dozen states where conversations can only be recorded if all parties to it agree. Vera is seeking $75,000, plus unspecified "special damages."
In a lawsuit (PDF) filed in a California court this week, Vera argues O'Keefe and Giles broke the law when they taped their conversation inside the ACORN office. California is one of about a dozen states where conversations can only be recorded if all parties to it agree. Vera is seeking $75,000, plus unspecified "special damages."
Former ACORN Employee Sues O'Keefe and Giles | Crooks and Liars
I can't see how any of that overshadows the fact that some Acorn employees were giving advice on how to run an underage prostitution ring and avoid the IRS. All the rest is just a smokescreen to divert attention away from a govt funded (you and I) organization doing wrong.
What the fuck are you talking about? He called the cops on two criminals. He REPORTED THEM TO THE COPS ...
Stupid.
Nice language. Really good communication skills. You must be very young as swearing does not make your point, rather it shows a level of immaturity. Name calling is not a debating technique.
Then I'm going to Sue Michael Moore for his "Overly Edited" Tapes..
Then again all the money he got from Halliburton he probably used it on Lawyers.
Yep, he was caught on tape trying to stop the importation of underage sex slaves and trying to gain information to share with the police, whom he called after o' queef left the building
Yep, he was caught on tape trying to stop the importation of underage sex slaves and trying to gain information to share with the police, whom he called after o' queef left the building
Will this be reported by FoxNews?
I ask this again, how do unemployed republicans feel being called bums, spoiled, hobos, etc?
seriously how can they go and vote for a person who called them a bum for not working. I really wish someone would address this. I got one response once, and some idiot said it was one guy who called them that. Well, thats not true.
well go and find an unemployed Republican and ask him or her....
I dont associate with them.
It would be great if they picked out prominent members of the Republican Party and sued them for "slander". Maybe go after FOX?
Well see how this plays out. Who knows? This could be a real issue in November.
We already know what the Republican leadership thinks about the unemployed and the poor (hobos, bums, spoiled, animals who breed, dumpster divers).
Look at what they did to an organization that helps the poor and middle class.
Imagine Republicans helping the "middle class". I can't. It's not possible.
You really should watch more news programs. Seriously. It would make you extremely happy because what you want to see happens all the time.
Republicans helping the middle class? You're not serious. The Republican leadership can hardly say the words "middle class".
I think it's "Agoraphobiaton". Inhabited by strange little people who never interact with the real world, who have oddly protective mothers and have at some point in their lives spent 3 consecutive years in someone's basement.
You really should watch more news programs. Seriously. It would make you extremely happy because what you want to see happens all the time.
Republicans helping the middle class? You're not serious. The Republican leadership can hardly say the words "middle class".
What alternate universe do you live in? I know it's the same one TM is in, but I'd like to find it.
I think it's "Agoraphobiaton". Inhabited by strange little people who never interact with the real world, who have oddly protective mothers and have at some point in their lives spent 3 consecutive years in someone's basement.
What the fuck are you talking about? He called the cops on two criminals. He REPORTED THEM TO THE COPS ...
Stupid.
Nice language. Really good communication skills. You must be very young as swearing does not make your point, rather it shows a level of immaturity. Name calling is not a debating technique.
We got people of all ages and maturiy levels here dropping all sorts of f-bombs. You might want to get used to it.
What the fuck are you talking about? He called the cops on two criminals. He REPORTED THEM TO THE COPS ...
Stupid.
Nice language. Really good communication skills. You must be very young as swearing does not make your point, rather it shows a level of immaturity. Name calling is not a debating technique.
You must be young and I say that because you really tried to divert from the point. That guy did exactly what he was supposed to do, he called the police.
This "pimp" who was lauded by Fox over and over and over again turned out to be the criminal here. He lied continually and Fox ate it up.
That man reported him to the police and because of fox, he was fired because Fox lied along with Okeefe.
Your solution, it seems, is to pick anything other than the fact he pointed out (that the man in question ccontacted the police) to avoid addressing that point.Nice language. Really good communication skills. You must be very young as swearing does not make your point, rather it shows a level of immaturity. Name calling is not a debating technique.
We got people of all ages and maturiy levels here dropping all sorts of f-bombs. You might want to get used to it.
I don't have to get used to anything. I prefer having intelligent debates. Name calling and swearing don neither. My solution will be to block immature posters as I have no desire to "debate" on their level.
Your solution, it seems, is to pick anything other than the fact he pointed out (that the man in question ccontacted the police) to avoid addressing that point.We got people of all ages and maturiy levels here dropping all sorts of f-bombs. You might want to get used to it.
I don't have to get used to anything. I prefer having intelligent debates. Name calling and swearing don neither. My solution will be to block immature posters as I have no desire to "debate" on their level.
It makes you look like both a fool and a punk.
Your solution, it seems, is to pick anything other than the fact he pointed out (that the man in question ccontacted the police) to avoid addressing that point.I don't have to get used to anything. I prefer having intelligent debates. Name calling and swearing don neither. My solution will be to block immature posters as I have no desire to "debate" on their level.
It makes you look like both a fool and a punk.
Ahh another name caller with keyboard courage. Your types are very bold while having the anonymity of the internet. I gave up name calling after high school but if that is your debating technique, you will be blocked along with the other immature posters. I want to have a mature debate, not one filled with name calling and swearing. That is my choice as you have yours.
The fact is, if you read my response, I agreed Okeffe broke the law. My argument is which was worse, advise regarding an underage prostitution ring or a guy dressed as a pimp illegally taping that advice.
