Foreign Policy Debate: Israel, an Ally or an Enemy?

Israel: Ally, Enemy, or In-Between? (Please read full choidescriptions before voting)

  • Israel First!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Israel controls America, and America likes it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Israel is America's greatest ally

    Votes: 4 33.3%
  • Israel is a foreign nation

    Votes: 5 41.7%
  • Israel controls America, and America does not like it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 25.0%

  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .

arKangel

Member
Aug 9, 2009
427
30
16
Midwest
Considering that the "foreign policy" debate is coming up, there is little doubt that both candidates will bend over backwards to show their undying loyalty to Israel. This seems like a good time to weigh how the relationship between the U.S. and Israel resonates with members of this board.

This poll is designed to give the zio-nutters their say, as well as reasonable Americans.

Diplomatic Language Blunders
Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that... I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
- [Israeli]PM Ariel Sharon


Israel First!
American goyim are Israeli cattle! It is an honor for American children to die for Israel!
!!! Ruwa` !!! Milchamah !!!
!!! Holy war for Israel !!!

Israel controls America, and America likes it!
America, and the world, owes Israel anything they want. Israeli's are the most peaceful people ever, and that is why everyone persecutes them. They are infallible and have the right to any and all lands; America knows this because it's in the bible. Anyone who criticizes or even slightly offends Israel should be prosecuted as a hate-criminal-terrorist and be crucified.

Israel is America's greatest ally.
Israeli socialist policies, state funded abortion, encouragement of homosexuals, large atheist population, and public denigration of Christ are perfectly aligned with American values. Aside from providing the U.S. with "intelligence" of countries they want attacked, Israel has also __? fill in the blank ?__ for America. (Please provide an example of something, anything, that Israel has ever actually done for the U.S.)

Israel is a foreign nation.
America has come dangerously close to ignoring the founding father's wisdom by becoming entangled in an alliance with Israel. The claims that Israel has usurped the U.S. government are possibly exaggerated. America should come first; the U.S. cannot afford any more war. Considering America's economic situation, the United States should seriously consider cutting off all foreign aid, including Israel. Israel should be considered equal to any other foreign nation when it comes to the need for American leftovers.

Israel controls America, and America does not like it!
Israel has stolen American nuclear technology, hypocritically calling for international monitoring of nuclear technology for everyone but themselves. AIPAC has fully infiltrated the American government, costing the U.S. billions in lopsided "foreign aid" and endless wars. America should cease foreign aid to all countries, especially Israel. American politicians who kowtow to foreign interests, such as AIPAC stooges in congress, should be prosecuted for treason.

Other
There is an aspect of Israel’s relationship with America not covered in this poll.

This is an anonymous poll, though I will share my vote: "Israel is a foreign nation".
 
Israel is Santayana's definition of a fanatic in Sovereign Form.

One who redoubles is effort while losing site of his objective.

The purpose of Israel was to give the world's Jewry a nation of their own. "A land without a people for a people without a land" as they said.

Except there were people already living there.

Today, Israel is living under daily attack, and most of the world's Jews would probably rather live in a nice "goyim" country with respect for freedom of religion. However, the Zionists do have their new friends, Funditarded Christians who want there to be an Israel so Jesus can come back.
 
Israel is Santayana's definition of a fanatic in Sovereign Form.

One who redoubles is effort while losing site of his objective.

The purpose of Israel was to give the world's Jewry a nation of their own. "A land without a people for a people without a land" as they said.

Except there were people already living there.

Today, Israel is living under daily attack, and most of the world's Jews would probably rather live in a nice "goyim" country with respect for freedom of religion. However, the Zionists do have their new friends, Funditarded Christians who want there to be an Israel so Jesus can come back.

So where do these statements stand in the context of America's foreign policy relationship with Israel?

Is America ruled by Israel as Ariel Sharon suggests?
Should America blindly support Israel?
Should Israel be a deciding factor in an American election?
 
Israel is Santayana's definition of a fanatic in Sovereign Form.

One who redoubles is effort while losing site of his objective.

The purpose of Israel was to give the world's Jewry a nation of their own. "A land without a people for a people without a land" as they said.

Except there were people already living there.

Today, Israel is living under daily attack, and most of the world's Jews would probably rather live in a nice "goyim" country with respect for freedom of religion. However, the Zionists do have their new friends, Funditarded Christians who want there to be an Israel so Jesus can come back.

Says the anti-semite.
 
Israel is Santayana's definition of a fanatic in Sovereign Form.

One who redoubles is effort while losing site of his objective.

The purpose of Israel was to give the world's Jewry a nation of their own. "A land without a people for a people without a land" as they said.

Except there were people already living there.

Today, Israel is living under daily attack, and most of the world's Jews would probably rather live in a nice "goyim" country with respect for freedom of religion. However, the Zionists do have their new friends, Funditarded Christians who want there to be an Israel so Jesus can come back.

Says the anti-semite.

Guy, the Arabs are as "Semitic" as the Israelis are... maybe more so....

Doesn't take away from my point your limited mind was unable to answer.
 
Israel is Santayana's definition of a fanatic in Sovereign Form.

One who redoubles is effort while losing site of his objective.

The purpose of Israel was to give the world's Jewry a nation of their own. "A land without a people for a people without a land" as they said.

Except there were people already living there.

Today, Israel is living under daily attack, and most of the world's Jews would probably rather live in a nice "goyim" country with respect for freedom of religion. However, the Zionists do have their new friends, Funditarded Christians who want there to be an Israel so Jesus can come back.

So where do these statements stand in the context of America's foreign policy relationship with Israel?

Is America ruled by Israel as Ariel Sharon suggests?
Should America blindly support Israel?
Should Israel be a deciding factor in an American election?

Since neither party is willing to stand up to Israel, I don't think it makes a wit of difference.

Israel spends a lot of money burnishing its image in the US...
 
Israel is Santayana's definition of a fanatic in Sovereign Form.

One who redoubles is effort while losing site of his objective.

The purpose of Israel was to give the world's Jewry a nation of their own. "A land without a people for a people without a land" as they said.

Except there were people already living there.

Today, Israel is living under daily attack, and most of the world's Jews would probably rather live in a nice "goyim" country with respect for freedom of religion. However, the Zionists do have their new friends, Funditarded Christians who want there to be an Israel so Jesus can come back.

Says the anti-semite.

Guy, the Arabs are as "Semitic" as the Israelis are... maybe more so....

Doesn't take away from my point your limited mind was unable to answer.

You're the one that's using the red herring. Your hate shapes your opinion.
 
Last edited:
f16i1.jpg
 
I hope you are not trying to pass this off as an unbiased poll. I could hardly think of a way to make your descriptions of the choices any more biased.
 
Since neither party is willing to stand up to Israel, I don't think it makes a wit of difference.

Israel spends a lot of money burnishing its image in the US...

I could agree with that.

Do you think America is completely subverted by Israel?
Or does America stand a chance to redeem itself?
 
The fact that the US is a melting pot, give us a unique take on foreign relations. We have Israeli-Americans and we have Palastinian-Americans. For Israel and Palastine to ask us to chose one over the other shows their complete lack of repect for our beliefs. I would like to see us cut off all aid to the entire middle east, to include military aid of any kind. Not one fucking bullet. Tell them all we need that money at home for the moment, if they truly are our friends and allies they'll understand if not fuck em.
 
I hope you are not trying to pass this off as an unbiased poll. I could hardly think of a way to make your descriptions of the choices any more biased.

Feel free to explain the bias.

Is the zio-nutter point of view not adequately presented?
 
Since neither party is willing to stand up to Israel, I don't think it makes a wit of difference.

Israel spends a lot of money burnishing its image in the US...

I could agree with that.

Do you think America is completely subverted by Israel?
Or does America stand a chance to redeem itself?

I think it's a dumb policy that is supported by a special interest group.

I feel the same way about keeping trade sanctions on Cuba 50 years later, because the Cuban Exile community in Florida has such a gripe on our politicians 'nads. Castro would have been gone with the rest of the Communists if there were normal trade with the US.
 
What a Retarded, Loaded Poll.
{vulgarity and insults}

A wide range of options representing points of view are available...
...from the zio-nutter to the reasonable American.

How could it be "loaded"?

Was there a point of view overlooked?
Please share.
 
Obviously this debate will have a good share of Israeli ass kissing. And nobody can change that except the American people.
 

Forum List

Back
Top