Ford announces 662HP Mustang that goes 200 mph - Why aren't libs screaming?

[Charles_Main]

Answer to question one....No it would COST more money. Shipping time frames would have to be increased because at those slow speeds it would take longer to get products to market and because of the additional hours, labor costs would increase.
Second part of the answer. No one would abide by a 45 mph speed limit and there isn't enough money to hire the law enforcement people to make sure drivers did obey...
Response to school shooter statement.....You're fucking kidding, aren't you?

Shipping costs??? HAHAHA. Yeah they might increase a little but think of all the billions of dollars saved by reduced medical bills and property damage. If a 45 mph speed limit means just a million fewer cars totalled on the highways each year, that means a savings of around $40 billion right there!!!.

And yes, we could get compliance. Speeding is a crime openly committed. It's easy to catch speeders and if we hit them with stiff penalties, they'd obey the law. If anyone caught doing over 60 was hit with a 3 month license suspension, they'd comply. THINK

45? lol you are crazy. You clearly have never had a job that required a long commute or lots of traveling on the Job.

 

[Charles_Main]

[ When it was announced the federal government was going to end the National 55 MPH limit, I watched a spokeswoman from some safety advocacy group advocate LOWERING speed limits to 45mph nationwide.
.

Well - what's wrong with a 45 mph speed limit? It would unquestionably save thousands more lives and billions of $.

Using your idiotic Logic we would end up with no driving allowed at all. After all 35 is safer than 45, and 25 is even safer, but what is safest of all is not driving at all.

I'm sorry but I am a free, Adult Human Being, I don't need my government controlling every little detail, and trying to make sure nobody ever gets hurt...ever. lol

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Using your idiotic Logic we would end up with no driving allowed at all. After all 35 is safer than 45, and 25 is even safer, but what is safest of all is not driving at all.

Using you logic we would end up with no speed limits at all. If 70 is Ok why not 90 or 120 etc. You libertarians think there should be no speed limits even in school zones.

 

[Unkotare]

Answer to question one....No it would COST more money. Shipping time frames would have to be increased because at those slow speeds it would take longer to get products to market and because of the additional hours, labor costs would increase.
Second part of the answer. No one would abide by a 45 mph speed limit and there isn't enough money to hire the law enforcement people to make sure drivers did obey...
Response to school shooter statement.....You're fucking kidding, aren't you?

Shipping costs??? HAHAHA. Yeah they might increase a little but think of all the billions of dollars saved by reduced medical bills and property damage. If a 45 mph speed limit means just a million fewer cars totalled on the highways each year, that means a savings of around $40 billion right there!!!.

And yes, we could get compliance. Speeding is a crime openly committed. It's easy to catch speeders and if we hit them with stiff penalties, they'd obey the law. If anyone caught doing over 60 was hit with a 3 month license suspension, they'd comply. THINK

'Good' little commies like you could be issued little red radar guns to report on your neighbors and even your own family. Maybe you could be given a nice blue suit with matching cap to wear as you enforce control for the glory of the state, eh comrade?

 

[Unkotare]

Answer to question one....No it would COST more money. Shipping time frames would have to be increased because at those slow speeds it would take longer to get products to market and because of the additional hours, labor costs would increase.
Second part of the answer. No one would abide by a 45 mph speed limit and there isn't enough money to hire the law enforcement people to make sure drivers did obey...
Response to school shooter statement.....You're fucking kidding, aren't you?

Shipping costs??? HAHAHA. Yeah they might increase a little but think of all the billions of dollars saved by reduced medical bills and property damage. If a 45 mph speed limit means just a million fewer cars totalled on the highways each year, that means a savings of around $40 billion right there!!!.

And yes, we could get compliance. Speeding is a crime openly committed. It's easy to catch speeders and if we hit them with stiff penalties, they'd obey the law. If anyone caught doing over 60 was hit with a 3 month license suspension, they'd comply. THINK

45? lol you are crazy. You clearly have never had a job that required a long commute or lots of traveling on the Job.

Travel? All he does is hide behind his couch. He's a terribly fearful little thing.

 

[skookerasbil]

Liberals want ALL of us driving 2 Door Specks, like the SmartforTwo.


Thankfully, Americans hate gay cars and live to drive mostly big fast ones.


Fuck the k00ks.........and hybrid sales go more and more into the shitter by the year since 2007 = fAiL.

 

[skookerasbil]

Hmmmm.............which vehicle would vast majority of American males prefer to drive???


This....................


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7Mbq5HpNAM]Toyota PRIUS with a Flowmaster Muffler (Hippie Support Vehicle for the Married Hot Rodder) - YouTube[/ame]



or this ( my ride ).............


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUNqJzdrZiY]2004 Mustang GT Black Exhaust/Burnouts - YouTube[/ame]





Which defines gay?

 

[thereisnospoon]

Answer to question one....No it would COST more money. Shipping time frames would have to be increased because at those slow speeds it would take longer to get products to market and because of the additional hours, labor costs would increase.
Second part of the answer. No one would abide by a 45 mph speed limit and there isn't enough money to hire the law enforcement people to make sure drivers did obey...
Response to school shooter statement.....You're fucking kidding, aren't you?

Shipping costs??? HAHAHA. Yeah they might increase a little but think of all the billions of dollars saved by reduced medical bills and property damage. If a 45 mph speed limit means just a million fewer cars totalled on the highways each year, that means a savings of around $40 billion right there!!!.

And yes, we could get compliance. Speeding is a crime openly committed. It's easy to catch speeders and if we hit them with stiff penalties, they'd obey the law. If anyone caught doing over 60 was hit with a 3 month license suspension, they'd comply. THINK

Dream on....Tell ya what. YOU go 45. Stay on the surface roads and avoid the interstates..
Speed limits at 55 were virtually unenforceable. And, it proved to be a hazard.
The fact is, most crashes are NOT caused by speed. That's a fact.
Judging by your user name, I will guess you are some kind of speed nazi/crusader. The one who drives in the passing lane 10 mph under the limit thinking "I'll SHOW THOSE BASTARDS"....People like you end up in ditches or in the guardrail. Eventually, someone is going move you out of the way. What happens to you after that is your fault.
No need for you to respond. I am quite through with you. Your argument is a loser in every sense of the word. BYE

 

[Jarlaxle]

Using your idiotic Logic we would end up with no driving allowed at all. After all 35 is safer than 45, and 25 is even safer, but what is safest of all is not driving at all.

Using you logic we would end up with no speed limits at all. If 70 is Ok why not 90 or 120 etc. You libertarians think there should be no speed limits even in school zones.

You are lying.

You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!
You need to STOP FUCKING LYING!

 

[Bill Angel]

What's the connection? What's the problem? Hot cars have multiple purposes. Assault weapons only have one - killing.

every single one of your cute little pictures could be an "assault weapon"......

Correct. And whatever you do, don't threaten a policeman with a hammer:

Taneytown man armed with hammer shot and killed by local police Christmas evening

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

'Good' little commies like you could be issued little red radar guns to report on your neighbors and even your own family. Maybe you could be given a nice blue suit with matching cap to wear as you enforce control for the glory of the state, eh comrade?

Sounds cool. If you saw someone with a gun endangering people, most of us wouldn't hesitate to call the cops. We should take the same attitude with driving criminals.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

.
Speed limits at 55 were virtually unenforceable. And, it proved to be a hazard.

Hazard?? HAHAHA. What an outrageous lie. When we went to the 55 in 1974, highway deaths immediately dropped by 16%.

 

[007]

This is an assault vehicle pure and simple. Even crazier than automatic rifles. No one NEEDS a car that does 3 times the legal speed limit. And yet libs say cool.

The $55K Ford Mustang That Goes 200*MPH - Home - The Daily Bail

Motor Trend - 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 Chases 200 MPH! - Ignition Episode 18

After running the GT500 through Motor Trend's testing gauntlet, including top speed pulls on the dyno, we head to Kingman, Arizona, where pro racer Randy Pobst gets behind the wheel to see if Ford's 662-HP beast can break the elusive 200 mph barrier.

Which 'libs' are you referring to, Mrs. Woodchipper Tragedy?

Well this dick head lasted a long time didn't he ... ...