Forbes uncovers Trump's likely Yuuugest conflict of interest

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by DrLove, Feb 13, 2018.

  1. equalizer_0
    Offline

    equalizer_0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2018
    Messages:
    125
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +48
    So would I.

    Democrats passed gun control in 1968 under Russian and Chinese influence, and the Clintons were deeply and intimately involved with, connected to, and dependent on China.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. equalizer_0
    Offline

    equalizer_0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2018
    Messages:
    125
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +48
    Sure. In their retirement funds. Whether they are aware of it or not. Whether they want it or not.
     
  3. Indeependent
    Offline

    Indeependent Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,601
    Thanks Received:
    2,213
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +12,451
    No one ever knows what’s in their funds.
     
  4. Defiant1
    Offline

    Defiant1 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    4,567
    Thanks Received:
    691
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +2,324


    On the 1040, what line does that go on?
     
  5. DrLove
    Offline

    DrLove Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2016
    Messages:
    4,619
    Thanks Received:
    679
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Ratings:
    +3,459
    I agree with you Emily - The Clintons are corrupt and Hillary was possibly the worst candidate Dems have ever anointed by hook and by crook. But they have been endlessly investigated for over 25 years and still nothing. Additionally, the Clinton Foundation also does a lot of good work and is rated in the 90+ (A) by both major charity rating organizations. Trump Foundation was a sham of the highest order.

    The Clintons are small change by comparison and she lost. Trump is in the White House and taking in big bucks from foreign governments. HE is the subject of my thread with was wrongly moved to "Conspiracy Theories".
     
  6. equalizer_0
    Offline

    equalizer_0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2018
    Messages:
    125
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +48
    FUCK charity rating organizations. Non-profits rating other non-profits is total bullshit, and they all have management, CEOs, and shell corporations raking in the big bucks just like a "for-profit" but without the taxes and accountability.

    I want Americans to have the opportunity to EARN their living, not depend on "charity" for it.

    403(b) pensions and all!
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2018
  7. Siete
    Offline

    Siete Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    23,192
    Thanks Received:
    2,417
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +12,368
    Tenants include Chinese commercial banks, the Walgreens Boots Alliance pharmacy, Capital One bank, and Bank of India. By holding onto his assets, President Trump has decided to test the applicability of the “Emoluments Clause” by renting his space to foreign governments.

    Forbes exposes who is paying rent at Trump properties

    and it just keeps coming non-stop.

    [​IMG]

    Trump-owned properties reportedly continue to be a hub of potential conflict of interest for the Trump administration. In their own database, Forbes has identified 164 tenants that pay the president’s real-estate empire about $175 million a year—which the magazine claims is only about 75 percent of the rent that flows his way.


    TAX RETURNS !
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  8. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    40,349
    Thanks Received:
    8,317
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,674
    So what...
     
  9. equalizer_0
    Offline

    equalizer_0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2018
    Messages:
    125
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +48
    Goldman Sachs has its own smarty-pants answer to the BRICS thesis, of course. "N-11" means "Next 11," meaning "Next after BRICS."
    The Goldman Sachs N-11 Equity Fund invests primarily in a portfolio of equity investments that are tied economically to the "N-11 countries" or in issuers that participate in the markets of the following N-11 countries: Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, South Korea, Turkey and Vietnam. While Iran is among the N-11 countries, the Fund will not invest in issuers organized under the laws of Iran, or domiciled in Iran, or in certain other issuers as necessary to comply with U.S. economic sanctions against Iran.
    Already skirting congressional sanctions in the prospectus. I would not buy for a minute that "South Korea" is restricted to "South," either. Nigerian 419 scammers, too. They have suddenly acquired just a little bit too much legitimacy. More of the same. Even more evil than BRICS. In a roundabout money-shifting way, it is slaves on the chopping block offered to Western investors of a certain net worth and general affectation of wealth.
     
  10. Siete
    Offline

    Siete Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    23,192
    Thanks Received:
    2,417
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +12,368
    SO “Emoluments Clause” by renting his space to foreign governments.

    The clause in question specifically states that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2018

Share This Page