FOR WHITES ONLY - A Long History of Affirmative Action

Discussion in 'Race Relations/Racism' started by Bass v 2.0, Nov 22, 2008.

  1. Bass v 2.0
    Offline

    Bass v 2.0 Biblical Warrior For God.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,655
    Thanks Received:
    528
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Paris, France
    Ratings:
    +528
    FOR WHITES ONLY - A Long History of Affirmative Action

    A Long History of Affirmative Action - For Whites

    Many middle-class white people, especially those of us from the suburbs, like to think that we got to where we are today by virtue of our merit - hard work, intelligence, pluck, and maybe a little luck. And while we may be sympathetic to the plight of others, we close down when we hear the words "affirmative action" or "racial preferences." We worked hard, we made it on our own, the thinking goes, why don't 'they'? After all, the Civil Rights Act was enacted almost 40 years ago.

    What we don't readily acknowledge is that racial preferences have a long, institutional history in this country - a white history. Here are a few ways in which government programs and practices have channeled wealth and opportunities to white people at the expense of others......................






    Reaping the Rewards of Racial Preference

    One result of the generations of preferential treatment for whites is that a typical white family today has on average eight times the assets, or net worth, of a typical African American family, according to economist Edward Wolff. Even when families of the same income are compared, white families have more than twice the wealth of Black families. Much of that wealth difference can be attributed to the value of one's home, and how much one inherited from parents.

    But a family's net worth is not simply the finish line, it's also the starting point for the next generation. Those with wealth pass their assets on to their children - by financing a college education, lending a hand during hard times, or assisting with the down payment for a home. Some economists estimate that up to 80 percent of lifetime wealth accumulation depends on these intergenerational transfers. White advantage is passed down, from parent to child to grand-child. As a result, the racial wealth gap - and the head start enjoyed by whites - appears to have grown since the civil rights days.

    In 1865, just after Emancipation, it is not surprising that African Americans owned 0.5 percent of the total worth of the United States. But by 1990, a full 135 years after the abolition of slavery, Black Americans still possessed only a meager 1 percent of national wealth.


    Rather than recognize how "racial preferences" have tilted the playing field and given us a head start in life, many whites continue to believe that race does not affect our lives. Instead, we chastise others for not achieving what we have; we even invert the situation and accuse non-whites of using "the race card" to advance themselves.

    Or we suggest that differential outcomes may simply result from differences in "natural" ability or motivation. However, sociologist Dalton Conley's research shows that when we compare the performance of families across racial lines who make not just the same income, but also hold similar net worth, a very interesting thing happens: many of the racial disparities in education, graduation rates, welfare usage and other outcomes disappear. The "performance gap" between whites and nonwhites is a product not of nature, but unequal circumstances.

    Colorblind policies that treat everyone the same, no exceptions for minorities, are often counter-posed against affirmative action. But colorblindness today merely bolsters the unfair advantages that color-coded practices have enabled white Americans to long accumulate.

    It's a little late in the game to say that race shouldn't matter.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    in other words, whites still owe blacks a living ? What is it you want ? We're a bit short on cash at the moment.
     
  3. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    Yes, groups favor themselves.

    Blacks favor themselves.

    Whites favor themselves.

    That's as natural as you favoring YOUR children over your neighbor's children. Nobody calls you "racist" for feeding your own child before you'd feed your neighbor's child. In fact, if you did that, they'd call you NUTS.

    The reason blacks aren't well off isn't because whites won't help them. It's because they've got IQ's that are 15 points lower, on average, than white IQ's.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2008
  4. B94
    Offline

    B94 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Messages:
    315
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Kansas
    Ratings:
    +43
    Mr Bass

    Do you believe white people should pay reparations to black people because of slavery? If so how much?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. WhiteLion
    Offline

    WhiteLion WMS.

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    780
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Pearl, Mississippi
    Ratings:
    +57
    Im sure they'll get it now...
     
  6. PackMule
    Offline

    PackMule (ZAN-TI-MOW)

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    216
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    So.Cal.
    Ratings:
    +9
    Like Social Security, the 1935 Wagner Act helped establish an important new right for white people. By granting unions the power of collective bargaining, it helped millions of white workers gain entry into the middle class over the next 30 years. But the Wagner Act permitted unions to exclude non-whites and deny them access to better paid jobs and union protections and benefits such as health care, job security, and pensions. Many craft unions remained nearly all-white well into the 1970s. In 1972, for example, every single one of the 3,000 members of Los Angeles Steam Fitters Local #250 was still white.


    _______________________________________________________________

    I'm a Witness to the Corruption in L. U. 250! I Joined in '66. The "Problems & Losses" to a Powerful Labor Union, have Multiplied, ever since we Opened The Doors to other Ethnic & Racial Members! ( BIGGER IS NOT ALWAYS BETTER!) Borders Are Defensive!

    Wallace Was RIGHT! Feds. Are Wrong!
     
  7. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    I totally agree with Charlies post here, folks.

    History matters.

    Net worth of most families is based on the net worth that the previous generation started with.
     
  8. PeterS
    Offline

    PeterS Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    973
    Thanks Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +71
    Actually I read the post as meaning that whites have long been the beneficiaries of affirmative action. I don't think pointing out the hypocrisy held by whites means that whites own blacks and minorities anything more than then what they [whites] themselves expect.

    In other words stop bitching about affirmative action when much of your net wealth has been built on it...
     

Share This Page