For the LAST fucking time...

[P@triot]

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. And the press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

 

[P@triot]

If I have to hear one more ignorant person on this board claim that "there were no WMD's in Iraq", my head might explode. The country was FILLED with WMD's, and even MSNBC has acknowledged that fact...


Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq - NBCNews.com

 

[P@triot]

Sarin gas AND Mustard gas - both chemical weapons (ie WMD's)

Sarin, Mustard Gas Discovered Separately in Iraq | Fox News

 

[8537]

ah yes, we've located the stockpiles east and north of Baghdad! The 30,000 lbs of Chemical weapons. The mobile weapons labs. The drones capable of delivering chemical weapons....

amiright?

 

[P@triot]

Oh look, yet another fucking article from a major national news outlet CONFIRMING WMD's in Iraq:

Tests Confirm Sarin in Iraqi Artillery Shell | Fox News

 

[P@triot]

ah yes, we've located the stockpiles east and north of Baghdad! The 30,000 lbs of Chemical weapons. The mobile weapons labs. The drones capable of delivering chemical weapons....

amiright?

Awww... is the radical little liberal sad that he found out his party has been feeding him propaganda, and now he wants to change the conversation?

WMD's confirmed in Iraq - and even radical left-wing propaganda nut jobs MSNBC have acknowledged it. What a shame that you are so misinformed, yet quick to comment.

 

[Mad Scientist]

I think it was Donald Rumsfeld who was instrumental in getting Saddam all that stuff back in the 80's?

 

[8537]

ah yes, we've located the stockpiles east and north of Baghdad! The 30,000 lbs of Chemical weapons. The mobile weapons labs. The drones capable of delivering chemical weapons....

amiright?

Awww... is the radical little liberal sad that he found out his party has been feeding him propaganda, and now he wants to change the conversation?

WMD's confirmed in Iraq - and even radical left-wing propaganda nut jobs MSNBC have acknowledged it. What a shame that you are so misinformed, yet quick to comment.

No, everyone knows they found a few chemical weapons from the time Reagan was supporting Saddam.

Anyone with half a brain realized that we didn't invade Iraq in search of a few expired chemical weapons from the time Rummie was shaking Saddam's hand.

The Bush administration - those with the most to win if such weapons were found - freely admit we found no WMD's. You still try to carry a bag for them that they don't even want carried.

 

[8537]

 

[GoneBezerk]

Oh come on, it was a vast right wing conspiracy that moved from getting Bill Clinton BJs behind Hillary's ass to fooling intel agencies around the world about Saddam moving and hiding WMD in the desert while he played games with IAEA inspectors for years.

 

[P@triot]

Instead of taking Pelosi's advice, Bush would do better to explain to the American people just what U.S. forces did find in their search for banned weapons in Iraq - starting with, for instance, the 1.8 tons of partially enriched uranium Saddam had socked away.

Here's how the Associated Press covered that news last June:

"In a secret operation, the United States last month removed from Iraq nearly two tons of uranium and hundreds of highly radioactive items that could have been used in a so-called dirty bomb, the Energy Department disclosed Tuesday.

"The nuclear material was secured from Iraq's former nuclear research facility and airlifted out of the country to an undisclosed Energy Department laboratory for further analysis," the AP said.

"Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham described the previously undisclosed operation, which was concluded June 23, as 'a major achievement' in an attempt to 'keep potentially dangerous nuclear material out of the hands of terrorists.'"

And if Bush needs more ammunition to refute Pelosi, he could cite the discovery of Sarin gas-filled artillery shells.

"We've found 10 or 12 Sarin and Mustard rounds," Iraq Survey Group chief Charles Duelfer told Fox News, after his team uncovered the WMD cache last June.

"We're finding things and we're getting reports of hidden caches almost every day which we have to investigate," Duelfer added.

NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

 

[GoneBezerk]

Dumbfuck, quit wasting bandwidth with no point.

 

[P@triot]

ah yes, we've located the stockpiles east and north of Baghdad! The 30,000 lbs of Chemical weapons. The mobile weapons labs. The drones capable of delivering chemical weapons....

amiright?

Awww... is the radical little liberal sad that he found out his party has been feeding him propaganda, and now he wants to change the conversation?

WMD's confirmed in Iraq - and even radical left-wing propaganda nut jobs MSNBC have acknowledged it. What a shame that you are so misinformed, yet quick to comment.

No, everyone knows they found a few chemical weapons from the time Reagan was supporting Saddam.

Anyone with half a brain realized that we didn't invade Iraq in search of a few expired chemical weapons from the time Rummie was shaking Saddam's hand.

The Bush administration - those with the most to win if such weapons were found - freely admit we found no WMD's. You still try to carry a bag for them that they don't even want carried.

You're so stupid, I don't even have to argue with you - your arguing with yourself. Just read your own words that I have highlighted for everyone to see. LMAO!!!

 

[GoneBezerk]

I remember reading the classified reports about the troops coming across WMD stockpiles but it was classified to make sure the foreign terrorists didn't rush to find them to use them.

Meanwhile the dumbfuck liberals were all over the TV, internet, etc talking out their asses about what they didn't know and still do today.

Oh, Saddam's WMDs are most likely in Syria....

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Oh look, yet another fucking article from a major national news outlet CONFIRMING WMD's in Iraq:

Tests Confirm Sarin in Iraqi Artillery Shell | Fox News

Does this "information" appear at any "major national news outlet" anywhere on line?

Thanks.

 

[bucs90]

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. And the press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

Media credibility is why.

Guess the Tea Party is right. Government cant do shit right....even fight a war with the most well funded military in the world.

 

[P@triot]

Again, have to change the conversation once you realized how misinformed you were about a topic that you're all too happy to spout off on anyway.

The issue is not whether we backed Saddam in the 80's. The issue is WMD's in Iraq. And clearly you are really embarassed that you have had no idea what you've been talking about. You know, we'd all respect you a lot more if you just admitted you were wrong for once...

 

[8537]

Awww... is the radical little liberal sad that he found out his party has been feeding him propaganda, and now he wants to change the conversation?

WMD's confirmed in Iraq - and even radical left-wing propaganda nut jobs MSNBC have acknowledged it. What a shame that you are so misinformed, yet quick to comment.

No, everyone knows they found a few chemical weapons from the time Reagan was supporting Saddam.

Anyone with half a brain realized that we didn't invade Iraq in search of a few expired chemical weapons from the time Rummie was shaking Saddam's hand.

The Bush administration - those with the most to win if such weapons were found - freely admit we found no WMD's. You still try to carry a bag for them that they don't even want carried.

You're so stupid, I don't even have to argue with you - your arguing with yourself. Just read your own words that I have highlighted for everyone to see. LMAO!!!

Fucking idiot. a few expired cannisters of mustard gas aren't evidence of chemical weapons. That's why Bush admitted we found no WMD's.

 

[P@triot]

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. And the press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

Media credibility is why.

Guess the Tea Party is right. Government cant do shit right....even fight a war with the most well funded military in the world.

Amen! But we've all know that for a long time. The sad part is how the main stream media has just become a propaganda arm for the Dumbocrats. Their job is to hold both party's feet to the fire. Instead, all they do is push the idiot liberal agenda blindly.

 

[bucs90]

AND....we didn't go into Iraq b/c of 9-11 or WMD's. Wanna know why we went there? And Afghanistan, instead of just smart bomb strikes?

Look at a map. Look at Iraq and Afghanistan. Whats in between those two places? Iran.

Now, think WW2. Think Germany. Think "Americans to the West, Russians to the East" and what that did to the Nazis.

Thats why we went into Iraq/Afghanistan. To prepare a two front war with Iran. Unfortunately, national support didn't hold long enough, and the stability didnt happen quick enough in Iraq, to make that last Now we're kinda fucked.